We use both -long-option and --long-option in tests. Switch to --long-option for consistency.
In the "llvm-readelf" mode, -long-option is discouraged as it conflicts with grouped short options and it is not accepted by GNU readelf.
While updating the tests, change llvm-readobj -s to llvm-readobj -S to reduce confusion ("s" is --section-headers in llvm-readobj but --symbols in llvm-readelf).
llvm-svn: 359649
offsets for code models other than small/medium. For JIT application,
memory layout is less controlled and can result in truncations
otherwise.
Patch based on one by Olexa Bilaniuk!
llvm-svn: 328400
I was surprised to see the code model being passed to MC. After all,
it assembles code, it doesn't create it.
The one place it is used is in the expansion of .cfi directives to
handle .eh_frame being more that 2gb away from the code.
As far as I can tell, gnu assembler doesn't even have an option to
enable this. Compiling a c file with gcc -mcmodel=large produces a
regular looking .eh_frame. This is probably because in practice linker
parse and recreate .eh_frames.
In llvm this is used because the JIT can place the code and .eh_frame
very far apart. Ideally we would fix the jit and delete this
option. This is hard.
Apart from confusion another problem with the current interface is
that most callers pass CodeModel::Default, which is bad since MC has
no way to map it to the target default if it actually needed to.
This patch then replaces the argument with a boolean with a default
value. The vast majority of users don't ever need to look at it. In
fact, only CodeGen and llvm-mc use it and llvm-mc just to enable more
testing.
llvm-svn: 309884
I also added a test.
Original message:
Allow FDE references outside the +/-2GB range supported by PC relative
offsets for code models other than small/medium. For JIT application,
memory layout is less controlled and can result in truncations
otherwise.
Patch from Akos Kiss.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6079
llvm-svn: 222897
Fangrui Song