By explicitly requesting the system linker with `-fuse-ld=`, the
tests are able to CHECK for the system linker even with
CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld.
Alternative to D74704.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92291
I am working on a baremetal riscv toolchain using LLVM runtime and
LLD linker. Baremetal.cpp provides most of the things needed for such
toolchain. So I have modified it to also handle riscv64/32-unknown-elf
targets alongside arm-none-eabi.
Currently, targets like riscv64-unknown-elf are handled by RISCVToolChain
which mostly expects a gcc toolchain to be present. If you dont
want the dependency on gcc-toolchain/libgloss or want to use LLD, then
RISCVToolChain is not a good fit.
So in the toolchain selection code, I have made this dependency of
RISCVToolChain on gcc toolchain explicit. It is created if gcc-toolchain
option is present. Otherwise Baremetal toolchain is created. I will be
happy to hear if there is a better way to choose between these two
toolchains.
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91442
Instead of checking if each symlink exists before removing it,
remove the whole temp dir housing the symlinks before recreating it.
This is a bit shorter, conceptually simpler (in that the first
and consecutive test runs have more similar behavior), it's what we're
already doing in almost all places where we do it, and it works if the
symlink exists but is a dead link (e.g. when it points into the build
dir but the build dir is renamed).
No intended behavior change.
D68391 added tests that check scenarios where no RISC-V GCC toolchain is
supposed to be detected. When running the tests on RISC-V hosts the system's
GCC toolchain will be detected, and the tests will fail. This patch adds a
`--gcc-toolchain` option pointing to a path where no GCC toolchain is
present, ensuring that the tests are run under the expected conditions, and
therefore are able to pass in all test environments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75061
Fix riscv-toolchain-extra tests to pass when CLANG_RESOURCE_DIR is set
to another value than the default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72591
Very few ELF platforms still use .ctors/.dtors now. Linux (glibc: 1999-07),
DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD (2012-03) and Solaris have supported .init_array
for many years. Some architectures like AArch64/RISC-V default to
.init_array . GNU ld and gold can even convert .ctors to .init_array .
It makes more sense to flip the CC1 default, and only uses
-fno-use-init-array on platforms that don't support .init_array .
For example, OpenBSD did not support DT_INIT_ARRAY before Aug 2016
(86fa57a279)
I may miss some ELF platforms that still use .ctors, but their
maintainers can easily diagnose such problems.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71393
If a GCC installation is not detected, then this attempts to
use compiler-rt and the compiler-rt crtbegin/crtend
implementations as a fallback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68407
If a GCC installation is not detected, then this attempts to
use compiler-rt and the compiler-rt crtbegin/crtend
implementations as a fallback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68407
If a GCC installed is not detected, the driver would default to
the root of the filesystem. This is not ideal when this doesn't
match the install directory of the toolchain and can cause
undesireable behavior such as picking up system libraries or
the system linker when cross-compiling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68391
Nico Weber