It seems like I should have ran the `check-clang` target after introducing a new warning diagnostic entry.
My bad. I'll run it next time; `check-clang-analysis` was not enough.
Here is a link to the broken bot: http://45.33.8.238/linux/78236/step_7.txt
This commit should fix this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
Fixes a regression on D127115 - splitting was creating extract_subvector(bitcast(build_vector())) patterns which prevented the build vectors being split before being bitcast to vXi16 types, resulting in various issues with further folding of the (now legal) build vectors
In foldSelectIntoOp we sometimes transform a select of a fadd into a
fadd of a select, where we select between data and an identity value.
For both fadd and fsub the identity is always -0.0, but if the nsz
flag is set on the select instruction we can use +0.0 instead. Doing
so then triggers other optimisations, such as when folding the select
of masked load into a new masked load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126774
The current RUN line leaves a parse-ir-error.s file around, which might
confuse the buildbots. Direct the output into the void instead (although
it would probably be better to direct it to FileCheck).
The implementation of the Lock class on Windows currently uses C++
mutexes. That introduces a dependency on the C++ runtime on that
platform.
Use a Windows CriticalSection instead of a std::mutex to avoid that
dependency.
This works for me with MinGW (tested in a CLANG64 environment of MSYS2).
See also D126291.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127316
D126215 removed the `AnalysisStoreOpt` field, so `clang-tidy` should not
refer to it.
http://45.33.8.238/linux/78232/step_4.txt
../../clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp:444:22: error: no
member named 'AnalysisStoreOpt' in 'clang::AnalyzerOptions'
AnalyzerOptions->AnalysisStoreOpt = RegionStoreModel;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
../../clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/ClangTidy.cpp:444:41: error: use of
undeclared identifier 'RegionStoreModel'
AnalyzerOptions->AnalysisStoreOpt = RegionStoreModel;
This one liner patch should resolve the build failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
This flag was introduced by
6818991d71
commit 6818991d71
Author: Ted Kremenek <kremenek@apple.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 22:06:12 2009 +0000
Add clang-cc option '-analyzer-opt-analyze-nested-blocks' to treat
block literals as an entry point for analyzer checks.
The last reference was removed by this commit:
5c32dfc5fb
commit 5c32dfc5fb
Author: Anna Zaks <ganna@apple.com>
Date: Fri Dec 21 01:19:15 2012 +0000
[analyzer] Add blocks and ObjC messages to the call graph.
This paves the road for constructing a better function dependency graph.
If we analyze a function before the functions it calls and inlines,
there is more opportunity for optimization.
Note, we add call edges to the called methods that correspond to
function definitions (declarations with bodies).
Consequently, we should remove this dead flag.
However, this arises a couple of burning questions.
- Should the `cc1` frontend still accept this flag - to keep
tools/users passing this flag directly to `cc1` (which is unsupported,
unadvertised) working.
- If we should remain backward compatible, how long?
- How can we get rid of deprecated and obsolete flags at some point?
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126067
In the transform dialect, a transform IR handle may be pointing to a payload IR
operation that is an ancestor of another payload IR operation pointed to by
another handle. If such a "parent" handle is consumed by a transformation, this
indicates that the associated operation is likely rewritten, which in turn
means that the "child" handle may now be associated with a dangling pointer or
a pointer to a different operation than originally. Add a handle invalidation
mechanism to guard against such situations by reporting errors at runtime.
Reviewed By: springerm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127480
This relatively small change will allow Flang's frontend driver,
`flang-new -fc1`, to consume and parse MLIR files. Semantically (i.e.
from user's perspective) this is identical to reading LLVM IR files.
Two file extensions are associated with MLIR files: .fir and .mlir. Note
that reading MLIR files makes only sense when running one of the
code-generation actions, i.e. when using one of the following action
flags: -S, -emit-obj, -emit-llvm, -emit-llvm-bc.
The majority of tests that required `tco` to run are updated to also run
with `flang-new -fc1`. A few tests are updated to use `fir-opt` instead
of `tco` (that's the preferred choice when testing a particular MLIR
pass). basic-program.fir is not updated as that test is intended to
verify the behaviour of `tco` specifically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126890
I'm trying to remove unused options from the `Analyses.def` file, then
merge the rest of the useful options into the `AnalyzerOptions.def`.
Then make sure one can set these by an `-analyzer-config XXX=YYY` style
flag.
Then surface the `-analyzer-config` to the `clang` frontend;
After all of this, we can pursue the tablegen approach described
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-tablegen-clang-static-analyzer-engine-options-for-better-documentation/61488
In this patch, I'm proposing flag deprecations.
We should support deprecated analyzer flags for exactly one release. In
this case I'm planning to drop this flag in `clang-16`.
In the clang frontend, now we won't pass this option to the cc1
frontend, rather emit a warning diagnostic reminding the users about
this deprecated flag, which will be turned into error in clang-16.
Unfortunately, I had to remove all the tests referring to this flag,
causing a mass change. I've also added a test for checking this warning.
I've seen that `scan-build` also uses this flag, but I think we should
remove that part only after we turn this into a hard error.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126215
This patch improves the fix in D110529 to prevent from crashing on value
with byval attribute that is not added in SCCP solver.
Authored-by: sinan.lin@linux.alibaba.com
Reviewed By: ChuanqiXu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126355
Until now, `-x` wasn't really taken into account in Flang's compiler and
frontend drivers. `flang-new` and `flang-new -fc1` only recently gained
powers to consume inputs other than Fortran files and that's probably
why this hasn't been noticed yet.
This patch makes sure that `-x` is supported correctly and consistently
with Clang. To this end, verification is added when reading LLVM IR
files (i.e. IR modules are verified with `llvm::verifyModule`). This
way, LLVM IR parsing errors are correctly reported to Flang users. This
also aids testing.
With the new functionality, we can verify that `-x ir` breaks
compilation for e.g. Fortran files and vice-versa. Tests are updated
accordingly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127207
By both AAPCS32 and AAPCS64, the test for whether an aggregate
qualifies as homogeneous (either HFA or HVA) is based on the data
layout alone. So any logical member of the structure that does not
affect the data layout also should not affect homogeneity. In
particular, an empty bitfield ('int : 0') should make no difference.
In fact, clang considered it to make a difference in C but not in C++,
and justified that policy as compatible with gcc. But that's
considered a bug in gcc as well (at least for Arm targets), and it's
fixed in gcc 12.1.
This fix mimics gcc's: zero-sized bitfields are now ignored in all
languages for the Arm (32- and 64-bit) ABIs. But I've left the
previous behaviour unchanged in other ABIs, by means of adding an
ABIInfo::isZeroLengthBitfieldPermittedInHomogeneousAggregate query
method which the Arm subclasses override.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127197
I've faced crashes in the past multiple times when some
`check::EndAnalysis` callback caused some crash.
It's really anoying that it doesn't tell which function triggered this
callback.
This patch adds the well-known trace for that situation as well.
Example:
1. <eof> parser at end of file
2. While analyzing stack:
#0 Calling test11
Note that this does not have tests.
I've considered `unittests` for this purpose, by using the
`ASSERT_DEATH()` similarly how we check double eval called functions in
`ConflictingEvalCallsTest.cpp`, however, that the testsuite won't invoke
the custom handlers. Only the message of the `llvm_unreachable()` will
be printed. Consequently, it's not applicable for us testing this
feature.
I've also considered using an end-to-end LIT test for this.
For that, we would need to somehow overload the `clang_analyzer_crash()`
`ExprInspection` handler, to get triggered by other events than the
`EvalCall`. I'm not saying that we could not come up with a generic way
of causing crash in a specific checker callback, but I'm not sure if
that would worth the effort.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127389
We already have patterns for matching fadd(select(..., -0.0)),
but an upcoming patch will lead to patterns using +0.0 as the
identity instead of -0.0. I'm adding support for these patterns
now to avoid any regressions for MVE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127275
This adds a fold for aggressive instcombine that converts
smin(smax(fptosi(x))) into a llvm.fptosi.sat, providing that the
saturation constants are correct and the cost of the llvm.fptosi.sat is
lower.
Unfortunately, a llvm.fptosi.sat cannot always be converted back to a
smin/smax/fptosi. The llvm.fptosi.sat intrinsic is more defined that the
original, which produces poison if the original fptosi was out of range.
The llvm.fptosi.sat will saturate any value, so needs to be expanded to
a fptosi(fpmin(fpmax(x))), which can be worse for codegeneration
depending on the target.
So this change thais conditional on the backend reporting that the
llvm.fptosi.sat is cheaper that the original smin+smax+fptost. This is
a change to the way that AggressiveInstrcombine has worked in the past.
Instead of just being a canonicalization pass, that canonicalization can
be dependant on the target in certain specific cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125755
There are various shortcuts in `BufferizationState::getBuffer` that avoid a buffer copy when we just need an allocation (and no initialization). This change adds those shortcuts to the TensorCopyInsertion pass, so that `getBuffer` can be simplified in a subsequent change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126821
Fix a case of importing a function with auto return type
that is resolved with a type template argument that is declared
inside the function.
Fixes#55500
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127396
Update the EarlyCSE tests to use opaque pointers.
Worth noting that this leaves some bitcast ptr to ptr instructions
in the input IR behind which are no longer necessary. This is
because these use numbered instructions, so it's hard to drop them
in an automated fashion (as it would require renumbering all other
instructions as well). I'm leaving that as a problem for another day.
The test updates have been performed using
https://gist.github.com/nikic/98357b71fd67756b0f064c9517b62a34.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127278
Export the driver-template.cpp.in file so that tools using
GENERATE_DRIVER work in standalone builds (currently only relevant
for clang). I've given the file an llvm- prefix, as we're now
searching for the file in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127384
D125887 changed the ctlz/cttz despeculation transform to insert
a freeze for the introduced branch on zero. While this does fix
the "branch on poison" issue, we may still get in trouble if we
pick a different value for the branch and for the ctz argument
(i.e. non-zero for the branch, but zero for the ctz). To avoid
this, we should use the same frozen value in both positions.
This does cause a regression in RISCV codegen by introducing an
additional sext. The DAG looks like this:
t0: ch = EntryToken
t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %3
t4: i64 = AssertSext t2, ValueType:ch:i32
t23: i64 = freeze t4
t9: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %0, t23
t16: ch = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 %4, Constant:i64<32>
t18: ch = TokenFactor t9, t16
t25: i64 = sign_extend_inreg t23, ValueType:ch:i32
t24: i64 = setcc t25, Constant:i64<0>, seteq:ch
t28: i64 = and t24, Constant:i64<1>
t19: ch = brcond t18, t28, BasicBlock:ch<cond.end 0x8311f68>
t21: ch = br t19, BasicBlock:ch<cond.false 0x8311e80>
I don't see a really obvious way to improve this, as we can't push
the freeze past the AssertSext (which may produce poison).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126638
Add new intrinsic and codegen support for the s_sendmsg_rtn_b32 and
s_sendmsg_rtn_b64 instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127315
In GFX10 dlc controlled L1 cache bypass. In GFX11 it has been repurposed
to control MALL NOALLOC, and glc controls L1 as well as L0 cache bypass.
Update the documentation and SIMemoryLegalizer accordingly. Set dlc for
nontemporal and volatile accesses.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127405
Remove a backwards dependence from Optimizer -> Lower by moving Todo.h
to the optimizer and out of lowering.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127292
Removes CodeAlignmentFactor and DataAlignmentFactor validation in EHFrameEdgeFixer. I observed some of aarch64 elf files generated by clang contains CIE record with code_alignment_factor = 4 or data_alignment_factor = -8. code_alignment_factor and data_alignment_factor are used by call fram instruction that should be correctled handled by libunwind.
Reviewed By: lhames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127062
* Fix assertion strings.
* Fixes assertion that arose from bad FIR being constructed.
With the default member-wise component assignment, the LHS and RHS may
be compatible but distinct types. This change to lowering manages both
the LHS and RHS independently rather than assume the two types are
identical. This avoids creating bogus FIR and asserting/crashing in
codegen.
Update the tests with the member-wise copy code.
This patch is part of the upstreaming effort from fir-dev branch.
Co-authored-by: Eric Schweitz <eschweitz@nvidia.com>
Reviewed By: jeanPerier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127297
The patch is a replacement of D125199. PseudoReadVL with vtype has worry for
computing same vtypes of VLEFF/VLSEGFF in two different places, DAGToDAG and
InsertVSETVLI. VLEFF/VLSEGFF MI with VL output still could provide the vtype of
VLEFF/VLSEGFF to the users of its VL.
The patch names the new pseudo as original VLEFF/VLSEGFF name suffixed "_VL" and
expand them in RISCVInsertVSETVLI pass.
This patch also reverts commit 4537aae0d5,
"[RISCV] Make PseudoReadVL have the vtypes of the corresponding VLEFF/VLSEGFF.".
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126794
Nuno Lopes