ValueManager::makeArrayIndex()/convertArrayIndex() methods. This
handles yet another crash case when reasoning about array indices of
different bitwidth and signedness.
llvm-svn: 75884
Objective-C pointers to using ObjCObjectPointerType.
Now the checking for 'attribute ((nonnull))' in Sema doesn't emit an error when
trying to apply that attribute to a parameter that is an Objective-C pointer
(this is a regression).
To prevent this regression from occuring in the future, the 'nonnull.c' test was
moved to test/SemaObjC and renamed 'nonnull.m'. I also enhanced the tests to
show that function calls involved a NULL Objective-C pointer constant does not
trigger a warning. This is consistent with GCC, but should likely be fixed.
llvm-svn: 75856
This removes the static data/methods on ObjCObjectPointerType while preserving the nice API (no need to fiddle with ASTContext:-).
This patch also adds Type::isObjCBuiltinType().
This should be the last fairly large patch related to recrafting the ObjC type system. The follow-on patches should be fairly small.
llvm-svn: 75808
This patch causes:
- StoreManager::InvalidateRegion() to not used the casted type of a region if
it would cause a pointer type to be invalidated as a non-pointer type.
- Pushes RegionStore::RetrieveElement() further by handling retrievals from
symbolic arrays that have been invalidated. This uses the new SymbolDerived
construct that was recently introduced.
The result is that the failing test in misc-ps-region-store-x86_64.m now passes.
Both misc-ps-region-store-x86_64.m and misc-ps-region-store-i386.m contain a
test case that motivated this change.
llvm-svn: 75730
- Declaration context of ParmVarDecls (that we got from the Declarator) was not their containing function.
- C++ out-of-line method definitions didn't get an access specifier.
Both were exposed by a crash when emitting a C++ method to a PCH file (assert at Decl::CheckAccessDeclContext()).
llvm-svn: 75597
- Previously this would crash on recursive types, and it was also incorrectly
stripping off a level of indirection.
- I'm not 100% convinced this is all correct, but it should be a monotonic
improvment.
llvm-svn: 75582
are not explicitly marked as not accepting NULL pointers. This check illustrates
how we need more refactoring in the custom-check logic.
llvm-svn: 75570
where we are comparing a symbolic value against itself, regardless of
the nature of that symbolic value.
This enhancement identified a case where RegionStoreManager is not
correctly symbolicating the values of the pointees of parameters. The
failing test is now in 'test/Analysis/misc-ps-region-store.m', with
that test file now (temporarily) marked XFAIL.
llvm-svn: 75521
- These kinds of "shotgun" tests are very slow, and do not belong in the
regression suite. If these kinds of tests are regarded to have value, they
should be added to the LLVM test-suite.
- I would actually like to remove all of these tests, but I left Sema/carbon.c
and SemaObjC/cocoa.m...
llvm-svn: 75399
The idea is to segregate Objective-C "object" pointers from general C pointers (utilizing the recently added ObjCObjectPointerType). The fun starts in Sema::GetTypeForDeclarator(), where "SomeInterface *" is now represented by a single AST node (rather than a PointerType whose Pointee is an ObjCInterfaceType). Since a significant amount of code assumed ObjC object pointers where based on C pointers/structs, this patch is very tedious. It should also explain why it is hard to accomplish this in smaller, self-contained patches.
This patch does most of the "heavy lifting" related to moving from PointerType->ObjCObjectPointerType. It doesn't include all potential "cleanups". The good news is additional cleanups can be done later (some are noted in the code). This patch is so large that I didn't want to include any changes that are purely aesthetic.
By making the ObjC types truly built-in, they are much easier to work with (and require fewer "hacks"). For example, there is no need for ASTContext::isObjCIdStructType() or ASTContext::isObjCClassStructType()! We believe this change (and the follow-up cleanups) will pay dividends over time.
Given the amount of code change, I do expect some fallout from this change (though it does pass all of the clang tests). If you notice any problems, please let us know asap! Thanks.
llvm-svn: 75314
Chris Lattner