If LLDB reads some incorrect input form /proc/<pid>/maps then it
should report an error instead of assert-ing as we don't want to
crash in case of an incorrect maps file.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22211
llvm-svn: 275060
We had some clients that had added old source paths remappings to their .lldbinit files and they were causing trouble at a later date. This fix should help mitigate these issues.
<rdar://problem/26358860>
llvm-svn: 274948
This feature was added to solve a lookup problem in expressions when local variables
shadow ivars. That solution requires fully realizing all local variables to evaluate
any expression, and can cause significant performance problems when evaluating
expressions in frames that have many complex locals.
Until we get a better solution, this setting mitigates the problem when you don't
have local variables that shadow ivars.
<rdar://problem/27226122>
llvm-svn: 274783
When multiple Android devices are attached, the default behaviour of ADB
is to resolve a device number based on the presence of ANDROID_SERIAL if
the serial number is not explicitly passed by the -s parameter. This patch
emulates that behaviour in lldb's ADB platform connector
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22052
llvm-svn: 274776
On android M it can happen that we get a ETXTBSY, when we try to launch the inferior. Sleeping
and retrying should help us get more stable results.
llvm-svn: 274763
Summary:
The issue arises due to the wrong unwinder used for the first
stack frame, where the default unwinder returns erroneous frame
whereas the fallback would have given the correct frame had it
been used.
The following fix consists of two parts ->
1) The first part changes the unwinding strategy, earlier the
default unwinder was used to get 2 more stack frames and if it
failed a fallback unwinder was used. Now we try to obtain as many
frames (max 10) as we can get from default unwinder and also
fallback unwinder and use the one that gives more number of frames.
2) Normally unwindplans are assosciated with functions and the
row to be used is obtained from the offset (obtained from the low_pc
of the function symbol). Sometimes it may occur that the unwindplan
is assosciated to the complete Elf section in which case the offset
calculation would be wrong as the debugger uses the same offset originally
obtained from the function symbol. Hence this offset is recalculated.
Reviewers: tberghammer, lldb-commits, labath, jasonmolenda
Subscribers: jingham
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221
llvm-svn: 274750
Summary:
This patch fills in the implementation of GetMemoryRegions() on the Linux and Mac OS core file implementations of lldb_private::Process (ProcessElfCore::GetMemoryRegions and ProcessMachCore::GetMemoryRegions.) The GetMemoryRegions API was added under: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20565
The patch re-uses the m_core_range_infos list that was recently added to implement GetMemoryRegionInfo in both ProcessElfCore and ProcessMachCore to ensure the returned regions match the regions returned by Process::GetMemoryRegionInfo(addr_t load_addr, MemoryRegionInfo ®ion_info).
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21751
llvm-svn: 274741
os name and version # from the mach-o binary as it scans the
header/load commands from memory and sends the details back
in the jGetLoadedDynamicLibrariesInfos response. lldb isn't
using these fields yet but I have a suspicion I'm going to
need them soon.
<rdar://problem/25251243>
llvm-svn: 274725
to find the solibs loaded in a process. Support two new ways of
sending the jGetLoadedDynamicLibrariesInfos packet to debugserver
and add a new jGetSharedCacheInfo packet. Update the documentation
for these packets as well. The changes to lldb to use these will
be a separate commit.
<rdar://problem/25251243>
llvm-svn: 274718
"frame variable" and "target variable" are trying to emulate the expression parser when doing things like:
(lldb) frame variable &my_struct.my_bitfield
And since the expression parser doesn't allow this, we shouldn't allow "frame variable" or "target variable" to succeed.
<rdar://problem/27208607>
llvm-svn: 274703
Bitfields were not correctly describing their offsets within the integer that they are contained within. If we had a bitfield like:
struct MyStruct {
uint32_t a:8;
uint32_t b:8;
};
ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex would say that child a and b had the following values in their respective ValueObjectChild objects:
name byte-size bit-size bit-offset byte-offset-from-parent
==== ========= ======== ========== =======================
"a" 4 8 0 0
"b" 4 8 0 1
So if we had a "MyStruct" at address 0x1000, we would end up reading 4 bytes from 0x1000 for "a", and 4 bytes from 0x1001 for "b". The fix for this is to fix the "child_byte_offset" and "child_bitfield_bit_offset" values returned by ClangASTContext::GetChildCompilerTypeAtIndex() so that now the table looks like:
name byte-size bit-size bit-offset byte-offset-from-parent
==== ========= ======== ========== =======================
"a" 4 8 0 0
"b" 4 8 8 0
Then we don't run into a problem when reading data from a file's section info using "target variable" before running. It will also stop us from not being able to display a bitfield values if the bitfield is in the last bit of memory before an unmapped region. (Like if address 0x1004 was unmapped and unreadable in the example above, if we tried to read 4 bytes from 0x1001, the memory read would fail and we wouldn't be able to display "b").
<rdar://problem/27208225>
llvm-svn: 274701
may be in a function that is non-ABI conformant, and the eh_frame
instructions correctly describe how to unwind out of this function,
but the assembly parsing / arch default unwind plans would be
incorrect.
This is to address a problem that Ravitheja Addepally reported in
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221 - I wanted to try handling the problem
with this approach which I think may be more generally helpful,
Ravitheja tested it and said it solves the problem on Linux/FreeBSD.
Ravi has a test case in http://reviews.llvm.org/D21221 that will
be committed separately.
Thanks for all the help on this one, Ravi.
llvm-svn: 274700
- if a synthetic child comes from the same hierarchy as its parent object, then it can't be cached by SharedPointer inside the synthetic provider, or it will cause a reference loop;
- but, if a synthetic child is made from whole cloth (e.g. from an expression, a memory region, ...), then it better be cached by SharedPointer, or it will be cleared out and cause an assert() to fail if used at a later point
For most cases of self-rooted synthetic children, we have a flag we set "IsSyntheticChildrenGenerated", but we were not using it to track caching. So, what ended up happening is each provider would set up its own cache, and if it got it wrong, a hard to diagnose crash would ensue
This patch fixes that by centralizing caching in ValueObjectSynthetic - if a provider returns a self-rooted child (as per the flag), then it gets cached centrally by the ValueObject itself
This cache is used only for lifetime management and not later retrieval of child values - a different cache handles that (because we might have a mix of self-rooted and properly nested child values for the same parent, we can't trivially use this lifetime cache for retrieval)
Fixes rdar://26480007
llvm-svn: 274683
Summary:
We are seeing infrequent failures to launch the inferior process on android. The failing call
seems to be execve(). This adds more logging to see the actual error reported by the call.
Reviewers: tberghammer
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits, danalbert
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22039
llvm-svn: 274624
settings or raise no error if not found.
From time to time it is useful to add some setting to work around or enable
a transitory feature. We've been reluctant to remove them later because then
we will break folks .lldbinit files. With this change you can add an "experimental"
node to the settings. If you later decide you want to keep the option, just move
it to the level that contained the "experimental" setting and it will still be
found. Or just remove it - setting it will then silently fail and won't halt
the .lldbinit file execution.
llvm-svn: 274593
I changed "m_is_optimized" in lldb_private::CompileUnit over to be a lldb::LazyBool so that it can be set to eLazyBoolCalculate if it needs to be parsed later. With SymbolFileDWARFDebugMap, we don't actually open the DWARF in the .o files for each compile unit until later, and we can't tell if a compile unit is optimized ahead of time. So to avoid pulling in all .o right away just so we can answer the questions of "is this compile unit optimized" we defer it until a point where we will have the compile unit parsed.
<rdar://problem/26068360>
llvm-svn: 274585
Summary:
One of the tests there does not work with gcc, so I'm spinning that off into a separate test, so
that we can XFAIL it with more granularity.
I am also renaming the test to reflect the fact that it no longer tests only integer arguments.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21923
llvm-svn: 274505
These are artifical symbols inside android oat files without any value
for the user while causing a significant perfoamce hit inside the
unwinder. We were already ignoring it inside system@framework@boot.oat
bot they have to be ignored in every oat file. Considering that oat
files are only used on android this have no effect on any other
platfrom.
llvm-svn: 274500
It is sufficient to set the handeler to SIG_IGN, to get the desired behaviour. Also, the handler
calling a lot of signal-unsafe functions.
llvm-svn: 274499
Summary:
This is a slightly reworked version of D16322, which I had reverted because it did not do what it
advertised. Differences from the previous version are:
- moved the code for cleaning up the remote working dir to a later point as it was removing the
log file before we could get to it.
- specialised log downloading code for gdb-remote tests is not needed, as this will cover that
use case as well.
Reviewers: tfiala
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21898
llvm-svn: 274491
The libc++ shipped with the android NDK is shipped using a different
internal namespace then the upstream libc++ (__ndk1 vs. __1) to avoid
an ODR violation between the platform and the user application. This
change fixes our pretty printers to be able to work with the types
from the android NDK libc++.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21680
llvm-svn: 274489
@unittest2.expectedFailure("rdar://7796742")
Which was covering up the fact this was failing on linux and hexagon. I added back a decorator so we don't break any build bots.
llvm-svn: 274388
We had support that assumed that thread local data for a variable could be determined solely from the module in which the variable exists. While this work for linux, it doesn't work for Apple OSs. The DWARF for thread local variables consists of location opcodes that do something like:
DW_OP_const8u (x)
DW_OP_form_tls_address
or
DW_OP_const8u (x)
DW_OP_GNU_push_tls_address
The "x" is allowed to be anything that is needed to determine the location of the variable. For Linux "x" is the offset within the TLS data for a given executable (ModuleSP in LLDB). For Apple OS variants, it is the file address of the data structure that contains a pthread key that can be used with pthread_getspecific() and the offset needed.
This fix passes the "x" along to the thread:
virtual lldb::addr_t
lldb_private::Thread::GetThreadLocalData(const lldb::ModuleSP module, lldb::addr_t tls_file_addr);
Then this is passed along to the DynamicLoader::GetThreadLocalData():
virtual lldb::addr_t
lldb_private::DynamicLoader::GetThreadLocalData(const lldb::ModuleSP module, const lldb::ThreadSP thread, lldb::addr_t tls_file_addr);
This allows each DynamicLoader plug-in do the right thing for the current OS.
The DynamicLoaderMacOSXDYLD was modified to be able to grab the pthread key from the data structure that is in memory and call "void *pthread_getspecific(pthread_key_t key)" to get the value of the thread local storage and it caches it per thread since it never changes.
I had to update the test case to access the thread local data before trying to print it as on Apple OS variants, thread locals are not available unless they have been accessed at least one by the current thread.
I also added a new lldb::ValueType named "eValueTypeVariableThreadLocal" so that we can ask SBValue objects for their ValueType and be able to tell when we have a thread local variable.
<rdar://problem/23308080>
llvm-svn: 274366
Summary:
As this test will create a new target, it will cause all following tests
to fail when running in platform mode, if the new target does not match
the existing architecture (for example, x86 vs x86_64).
Reviewers: zturner, spyffe, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21906
llvm-svn: 274364
I overlooked the possibility of certain targets translating increment statement into a read and write.
In this case we replace increment statement with an assignment.
llvm-svn: 274215
Tamas Berghammer