Now the lexer just produces a token and the parser is the one responsible for
activating it.
This fixes problem like the one pr11797 where the lexer and the parser were not
in sync. This also let us be more strict on where in the file we accept
these pragmas.
llvm-svn: 149014
Pass a typo correction callback object from ParseCastExpr to
Sema::ActOnIdExpression to be a bit more selective about what kinds of
corrections will be allowed for unknown identifiers.
llvm-svn: 148973
is a declaration-stmt or an expression, we can discern a subset of cases where
the user erred in omitting the typename keyword before a dependent type name.
Fixes PR11358!
llvm-svn: 148896
This is the last piece of N3031 (decltype in weird places) - supporting
the use of decltype in a class ctor's member-initializer-list to
specify the base classes to initialize.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 148789
function body. This keeps the brace count accurate to prevent
additional errors. Also, moved the caret from the brace to the function
name.
Code:
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
Fixed error:
parameters.cc:1:14: error: function definition does not declare parameters
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
1 error generated.
Old errors:
parameters.cc:1:17: error: function definition does not declare parameters
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
parameters.cc:1:30: error: expected ';' after class
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
;
parameters.cc:1:31: error: expected external declaration
class F{ int Foo{ return 1; } };
^
3 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 148621
Old error:
plusequaldeclare1.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration
int x += 6;
^
;
New error:
plusequaldeclare1.cc:3:9: error: invalid '+=' at end of declaration; did you
mean '='?
int x += 6;
^~
=
llvm-svn: 148433
- If the declarator is at the start of a line, and the previous line contained
another declarator and ended with a comma, then that comma was probably a
typo for a semicolon:
int n = 0, m = 1, l = 2, // k = 5;
myImportantFunctionCall(); // oops!
- If removing the parentheses would correctly initialize the object, then
produce a note suggesting that fix.
- Otherwise, if there is a simple initializer we can suggest which performs
value-initialization, then provide a note suggesting a correction to that
initializer.
Sema::Declarator now tracks the location of the comma prior to the declarator in
the declaration, if there is one, to facilitate providing the note. The code to
determine an appropriate initializer from the -Wuninitialized warning has been
factored out to allow use in both that and -Wvexing-parse.
llvm-svn: 148072
- reject definitions of enums within friend declarations
- require 'enum', not 'enum class', for non-declaring references to scoped
enumerations
llvm-svn: 147824
the Semantic Powers to only warn on class types (or dependent types), where the
constructor or destructor could do something interesting.
llvm-svn: 147642
scope, when no other indication is provided that the user intended to declare a
function rather than a variable.
Remove some false positives from the existing 'parentheses disambiguated as a
function' warning by suppressing it when the declaration is marked as 'typedef'
or 'extern'.
Add a new warning group -Wvexing-parse containing both of these warnings.
The new warning is enabled by default; despite a number of false positives (and
one bug) in clang's test-suite, I have only found genuine bugs with it when
running it over a significant quantity of real C++ code.
llvm-svn: 147599
modules. This leaves us without an explicit syntax for importing
modules in C/C++, because such a syntax needs to be discussed
first. In Objective-C/Objective-C++, the @import syntax is used to
import modules.
Note that, under -fmodules, C/C++ programs can import modules via the
#include mechanism when a module map is in place for that header. This
allows us to work with modules in C/C++ without committing to a syntax.
llvm-svn: 147467
Split out a new ExpressionEvaluationContext flag for this case, and don't treat
it as unevaluated in C++11. This fixes some crash-on-invalids where we would
allow references to class members in potentially-evaluated constant expressions
in static member functions, and also fixes half of PR10177.
The fix to PR10177 exposed a case where template instantiation failed to provide
a source location for a diagnostic, so TreeTransform has been tweaked to supply
source locations when transforming a type. The source location is still not very
good, but MarkDeclarationsReferencedInType would need to operate on a TypeLoc to
improve it further.
Also fix MarkDeclarationReferenced in C++98 mode to trigger instantiation for
static data members of class templates which are used in constant expressions.
This fixes a link-time problem, but we still incorrectly treat the member as
non-constant. The rest of the fix for that issue is blocked on PCH support for
early-instantiated static data members, which will be added in a subsequent
patch.
llvm-svn: 146955
Stopping at '@' was originally intended to avoid skipping an '@' at the @interface context
when doing parser recovery, but we should not stop at all '@' tokens because they may be part
of expressions (e.g. in @"string", @selector(), etc.), so in most cases we will want to skip them.
This commit caused 'test/Parser/method-def-in-class.m' to fail for the cases where we tried to
recover from unmatched angle bracket but IMO it is not a big deal to not have good recovery
from such broken code and the way we did recovery would not always work anyway (e.g. if there was '@'
in an expression).
The case that rdar://7029784 is about still passes.
llvm-svn: 146815
because the memory associated with them is going to get released.
We also don't want them to affect later parsing.
(We do the same for C++ inline methods.)
The underlying cause for the leftover tokens is going to be addressed in the
next commit.
Couldn't get a test case for the crash though. rdar://10583033.
llvm-svn: 146814
Necessary to parse Microsoft ATL code.
Example:
int array[] = {
0,
__if_exists(CLASS::Type) {2, }
3
};
will declare an array of 2 or 3 elements depending on if CLASS::Type exists or not.
llvm-svn: 146447
declaration tickles a bug in the way we handle visibility pragmas.
The improvement to error recovery for template function definitions declared
with the 'typedef' specifier in r145372 is unrelated and not reverted here.
llvm-svn: 145541
declaration at namespace scope is followed by a semicolon and an open-brace
(or in C++, a 'try', ':' or '='), then the error is probably a function
definition with a spurious ';', rather than a mysterious '{'.
llvm-svn: 145372
default", make a note of which is used when creating the
initial declaration. Previously, we would wait until later to handle
default/delete as a definition, but this is too late: when adding the
declaration, we already treated the declaration as "user-provided"
when in fact it was merely "user-declared".
Fixes PR10861 and PR10442, along with a bunch of FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 144011
Microsoft __if_exists/__if_not_exists statement. Also note that we
weren't traversing DeclarationNameInfo *at all* within the
RecursiveASTVisitor, which would be rather fatal for variadic
templates.
llvm-svn: 142906
statements. As noted in the documentation for the AST node, the
semantics of __if_exists/__if_not_exists are somewhat different from
the way Visual C++ implements them, because our parsed-template
representation can't accommodate VC++ semantics without serious
contortions. Hopefully this implementation is "good enough".
llvm-svn: 142901
analysis to separate dependent names from non-dependent names. For
dependent names, we'll behave differently from Visual C++:
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists at class scope, we'll just warn
and then ignore them.
- For __if_exists/__if_not_exists in statements, we'll treat the
inner statement as a compound statement, which we only instantiate
in templates where the dependent name (after instantiation)
exists. This behavior is different from VC++, but it's as close as
we can get without encroaching ridiculousness.
The latter part (dependent statements) is not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 142864
instead of a semicolon (as sometimes happens during refactorings). When such a
comma is seen at the end of a line, and is followed by something which can't
possibly be a declarator (or even something which might be a plausible typo for
a declarator), suggest that a semicolon was intended.
llvm-svn: 142544
Benjamin Kramer