clang would incorrectly not allow the following:
int x = true ? (throw 1) : 2;
The problem exists because we don't see beyond the parens.
This, in turn, causes us to believe that we are choosing between void
and int which we diagnose as an error.
Instead, allow clang to see the 'throw' inside the parens.
llvm-svn: 183085
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
David Majnemer