Recommit without changes over 53abe3ff66,
which addressed the cause of the reported crash.
-----
With opaque pointers, the zero-offset load will generally not use
a GEP. Allow a direct load without GEP, which is treated the same
way as a zero-offset GEP.
Use the overload that support moving into an empty block. I don't
think that this situation can occur right now, but it can happen
with the change from e7fb1c15cb,
and the test is derived from the issue reported there.
With opaque pointers, the zero-offset load will generally not use
a GEP. Allow a direct load without GEP, which is treated the same
way as a zero-offset GEP.
MergeICmps will currently sort (by offset) all comparisons in a chain,
including those that do not get merged. This is problematic in two ways:
* We may end up moving the original first block into the middle of
the chain, in which case the "extra work" instructions will also
be in the middle of the chain, resulting in invalid IR
(reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D108782#3005583).
* Reordering branches is generally not legal, because it may
introduce branch on poison, which is UB (PR51845). The merging
done by MergeICmps is legal as long as we assume that memcmp()
works on frozen memory, but the reordering of unmerged comparisons
is definitely incorrect (without inserting freeze instructions),
so we should avoid it.
There are easier ways to fix the first issue, but I figured it was
worthwhile to do this properly to also fix the second one. What we
now do is to restore the original relative order of (potentially
merged) comparisons.
I took the liberty of dropping the MERGEICMPS_DOT_ON functionality,
because it would be more awkward to implement now (as the before and
after representation is different) and it doesn't seem terribly
useful nowadays.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110024
This is another followup to D106591. Even if there is an
instruction that clobbers one of the loads, this doesn't matter if
it happens before the loads. Those instructions aren't affected by
the transform at all.
The gep-references-bb.ll is modified to preserve the spirit of the
test, as the store to @g no longer impacts the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108782
IIUC we can't emit `memcmp` between pointers in addressspaces,
doing so will trigger an assertion since the signature of the memcmp
will not match it's arguments (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48661).
This PR disables the attempt to merge icmps,
when the pointer is in an addressspace.
Reviewed By: #julialang, vtjnash
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94813
This is a followup to D106591. MergeICmps currently only allows
sinking the loads past either instructions that don't write to
memory at all, or simple loads/stores that don't modify the memory
the loads access.
The "simple loads/stores" part of this check doesn't seem necessary
to me -- AA isModRef() already accurately models any operation
that may clobber the memory. For example, in the adjusted test case
the transform is still fine if the call to @foo() isn't readonly,
but inaccessiblememonly -- in both cases, the call cannot modify
the loaded memory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108517
The check for sinking instructions past the load + cmp sequence
currently checks for side-effects, which includes writing to memory
and unwinding. However, I don't believe we care about sinking the
instructions past an unwind (as they don't have any side-effects
themselves).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106591
There's a potential change in dereferenceability attribute semantics in the nearish future. See llvm-dev thread "RFC: Decomposing deref(N) into deref(N) + nofree" and D99100 for context.
This change simply adds appropriate attributes to tests to keep transform logic exercised under both old and new/proposed semantics. Note that for many of these cases, O3 would infer exactly these attributes on the test IR.
This change handles the idiomatic pattern of a dereferenceable object being passed to a call which can not free that memory. There's a couple other tests which need more one-off attention, they'll be handled in another change.
- When emitting libcalls, do not only pass the calling convention from the
function prototype but also the attributes.
- Do not pass attributes from e.g. libc memcpy to llvm.memcpy.
Review: Reid Kleckner, Eli Friedman, Arthur Eubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103992
We were not correctly splitting a blocks for chains of length 1.
Before that change, additional instructions for blocks in chains of
length 1 were not split off from the block before removing (this was
done correctly for chains of longer size).
If this first block contained an instruction referenced elsewhere,
deleting the block, would result in invalidation of the produced value.
This caused a miscompile which motivated D92297 (before D17993,
nonnull and dereferenceable attributed were not added so MergeICmps were
not triggered.) The new test gep-references-bb.ll demonstrate the issue.
The regression was introduced in
rG0efadbbcdeb82f5c14f38fbc2826107063ca48b2.
This supersedes D92364.
Test case by MaskRay (Fangrui Song).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92375
With a fix for PR41917: The predecessor list was changing under our feet.
- for (BasicBlock *Pred : predecessors(EntryBlock_)) {
+ while (!pred_empty(EntryBlock_)) {
+ BasicBlock* const Pred = *pred_begin(EntryBlock_);
llvm-svn: 361009
Instead of patching the original blocks, we now generate new blocks and
delete the old blocks. This results in simpler code with a less twisted
control flow (see the change in `entry-block-shuffled.ll`).
This will make https://reviews.llvm.org/D60318 simpler by making it more
obvious where control flow created and deleted.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, spatel
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61736
llvm-svn: 360771
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Summary:
This patch prevents MergeICmps to performn the transformation if the address operand GEP of the load instruction has a use outside of the load's parent block. Without this patch, compiler crashes with the given test case because the use of `%first.i` is still around when the basic block is erased from https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/Scalar/MergeICmps.cpp#L620. I think checking `isUsedOutsideOfBlock` with `GEP` is the original intention of the code, as the checking for `LoadI` is already performed in the same function.
This patch is incomplete though, as this makes the pass overly conservative and fails the test `tuple-four-int8.ll`. I believe what needs to be done is checking if GEP has a use outside of block that is not the part of "Comparisons" chain. Submit the patch as of now to prevent compiler crash.
Reviewers: courbet, trentxintong
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54089
llvm-svn: 346151
Summary:
The visitICmp analysis function would record compares of pointer types, as size 0. This causes the resulting memcmp() call to have the wrong total size.
Found with "self-build" of clang/LLVM on Windows.
Reviewers: christylee, trentxintong, courbet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53536
llvm-svn: 345413
Summary:
We do not try to move the instructions and split the block till we
know the blocks can be split, i.e. BCE-cmp-insts can be separated from
non-BCE-cmp-insts.
Reviewers: davide, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44443
llvm-svn: 329564
Summary: Fix a bug in entry block shuffled to middle of the chain.
Reviewers: davide, courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44642
llvm-svn: 327971
Summary:
We can discard initial blocks that do other work
We do not need to limit ourselves to just the first block in the chain.
Reviewers: courbet, davide
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44029
llvm-svn: 326698
Summary:
Fix a bug in MergeICmp that can lead to a BCECmp block being processed more than once and eventually lead to a broken LLVM module.
The problem is that if the non-constant value is not produced by the last block, the producer will be processed once when the its parent block
is processed and second time when the last block is processed.
We end up having 2 same BCECmpBlock in the merge queue. And eventually lead to a broken LLVM module.
Reviewers: courbet, davide
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43825
llvm-svn: 326318
- Fix condition for detecting that a complex basic block was the first in
the chain.
- Add tests.
This was caught by buildbots when submitting rL324319.
llvm-svn: 324341
Nikita Popov