tring str2;
we produce the following diagnostic + fix-it:
typo.cpp:15:1: error: unknown type name 'tring'; did you mean 'string'?
tring str2;
^~~~~
string
To make this really useful, we'll need to introduce typo correction in
many more places (wherever we do name lookup), and implement
declaration-vs-expression heuristics that cope with typos
better. However, for now this will handle the simple cases where we
already get good "unknown type name" diagnostics.
The LookupVisibleDecls functions are intended to be used by code
completion as well as typo correction; that refactoring will happen
later.
llvm-svn: 92308
explicitly-specified template arguments are enough to determine the
instantiation, and either template argument deduction fails or is not
performed in that context, we can resolve the template-id down to a
function template specialization (so sayeth C++0x
[temp.arg.explicit]p3). Fixes PR5811.
llvm-svn: 91852
Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
different functions and pick the function at lookup initialization time.
In theory we could actually divide the criteria functions into N different
functions for the N cases, but it's so not worth it.
Among other things, lets us invoke LookupQualifiedName without recomputing
IDNS info every time.
Do some refactoring in SemaDecl to avoid an awkward special case in LQN
that was only necessary for redeclaration testing for anonymous structs/unions ---
which could be done more efficiently with a scoped lookup anyway.
llvm-svn: 91676
new InitializationSequence. This fixes some bugs (e.g., PR5808),
changed some diagnostics, and caused more churn than expected. What's
new:
- InitializationSequence now has a "C conversion sequence" category
and step kind, which falls back to
- Changed the diagnostics for returns to always have the result type
of the function first and the type of the expression second.
CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints to peform checking in C.
- Improved ASTs for initialization of return values. The ASTs now
capture all of the temporaries we need to create, but
intentionally do not bind the tempoary that is actually returned,
so that it won't get destroyed twice.
- Make sure to perform an (elidable!) copy of the class object that
is returned from a class.
- Fix copy elision in CodeGen to properly see through the
subexpressions that occur with elidable copies.
- Give "new" its own entity kind; as with return values and thrown
objects, we don't bind the expression so we don't call a
destructor for it.
Note that, with this patch, I've broken returning move-only types in
C++0x. We'll fix it later, when we tackle NRVO.
llvm-svn: 91669
function in a C++ call using an arbitrary call-expression type.
Actually exploit this to fix the recovery implemented earlier.
The diagnostic is still iffy, though.
llvm-svn: 91538
used as expressions). In dependent contexts, try to recover by doing a lookup
in previously-dependent base classes. We get better diagnostics out, but
unfortunately the recovery fails: we need to turn it into a method call
expression, not a bare call expression. Thus this is still a WIP.
llvm-svn: 91525
InitializationSequence to perform the actual initialization.
Also, introduced the notion of a tree of initialized entities, so that
we can know where an initialization began when dealing with nested
initializations (as occur when performing list initialization). This
will, eventually, be useful for producing better diagnostics when list
initialization fails, because we can show the path from the top-level
object being initialized down to the actual subobject where
initialization failed.
llvm-svn: 91516
than using its own partial implementation of initialization.
Switched CheckInitializerTypes over to
InitializedEntity/InitializationKind, to help move us closer to
InitializationSequence.
Added InitializedEntity::getName() to retrieve the name of the entity,
for diagnostics that care about such things.
Implemented support for default initialization in
InitializationSequence.
Clean up the determination of the "source expressions" for an
initialization sequence in InitializationSequence::Perform.
Taught CXXConstructExpr to store more location information.
llvm-svn: 91492
in a potentially potentially evaluated context, queue those
diagnostics and only emit them if the context ends up being
potentially evaluated. This completes the fix for PR5761.
llvm-svn: 91213
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
using value decls; we optimistically assume they won't turn into conflicts.
Teach it to tell the caller *why* the function doesn't overload with the returned
decl; this will be useful for using hiding.
llvm-svn: 90939
intended. On the first testcase in the bug, we now produce:
cxx-decl.cpp:12:2: error: unexpected ':' in nested name specifier
y:a a2;
^
::
instead of:
t.cc:8:1: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
x:a a2;
^
t.cc:8:2: error: invalid token after top level declarator
x:a a2;
^
;
t.cc:9:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a2'
x::a a3 = a2;
^
llvm-svn: 90713
instantiation, to ensure that we mark class template specilizations as
abstract when we need to and perform checking of abstract classes.
Also, move the checking that determines whether we are creating a
variable of abstract class type *after* we check whether the type is
complete. Otherwise, we won't see when we have an abstract class
template specialization that is implicitly instantiated by this
declaration. This is the "something else" that Sebastian had noted
earlier.
llvm-svn: 90467
overloaded-operator resolution is wildly untested, but the parallel code for
methods seems to satisfy some trivial tests.
Also change some overload-resolution APIs to take a type instead of an expression,
which lets us avoid creating a spurious CXXThisExpr when resolving implicit
member accesses.
llvm-svn: 90410
there's nothing interesting we can say now that we're correctly not requiring
the qualifier to name a known base class in dependent contexts.
Require scope specifiers on member access expressions to name complete types
if they're not dependent; delay lookup when they are dependent.
Use more appropriate diagnostics when qualified implicit member access
expressions find declarations from unrelated classes.
llvm-svn: 90289
Douglas Gregor