This patch changes the way labels are referenced. Instead of referencing the
basic-block label name (eg. .LBB0_0), instructions now just have an immediate
which indicates the depth in the control-flow stack to find a label to jump to.
This makes them much closer to what we expect to have in the binary encoding,
and avoids the problem of basic-block label names not being explicit in the
binary encoding.
Also, it terminates blocks and loops with end_block and end_loop instructions,
rather than basic-block label names, for similar reasons.
This will also fix problems where two constructs appear to have the same label,
because we no longer explicitly use labels, so consumers that need labels will
presumably create their own labels, and presumably they won't reuse labels
when they do.
This patch does make the code a little more awkward to read; as a partial
mitigation, this patch also introduces comments showing where the labels are,
and comments on each branch showing where it's branching to.
llvm-svn: 257505
Summary: I forgot to squash git commits before doing an svn dcommit of D12219. Reverting, and re-submitting.
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12298
llvm-svn: 245886
Summary:
Add a basic CodeGen bitcode test which (for now) only prints out the function name and nothing else. The current code merely implements the basic needed for the test run to not crash / assert. Getting to that point required:
- Basic InstPrinter.
- Basic AsmPrinter.
- DiagnosticInfoUnsupported (not strictly required, but nice to have, duplicated from AMDGPU/BPF's ISelLowering).
- Some SP and register setup in WebAssemblyTargetLowering.
- Basic LowerFormalArguments.
- GenInstrInfo.
- Placeholder LowerFormalArguments.
- Placeholder CanLowerReturn and LowerReturn.
- Basic DAGToDAGISel::Select, which requiresGenDAGISel.inc as well as GET_INSTRINFO_ENUM with GenInstrInfo.inc.
- Remove WebAssemblyFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves and rely on default.
- Implement WebAssemblyFrameLowering::hasFP, same as AArch64's implementation.
Follow-up patches will implement a real AsmPrinter, which will require adding MI opcodes specific to WebAssembly.
Reviewers: sunfish
Subscribers: aemerson, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11369
llvm-svn: 242939
Dan Gohman