Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Amy Huang 7b1d793713 Reland "Change the X86 datalayout to add three address spaces
for 32 bit signed, 32 bit unsigned, and 64 bit pointers."
This reverts 57076d3199.

Original review at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64931.
Review for added fix at https://reviews.llvm.org/D66843.

llvm-svn: 371568
2019-09-10 23:15:38 +00:00
Vlad Tsyrklevich 57076d3199 Revert "Change the X86 datalayout to add three address spaces for 32 bit signed,"
This reverts commit r370083 because it caused check-lld failures on
sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast.

llvm-svn: 370142
2019-08-28 01:08:54 +00:00
Amy Huang 1299945b81 Change the X86 datalayout to add three address spaces for 32 bit signed,
32 bit unsigned, and 64 bit pointers.

llvm-svn: 370083
2019-08-27 17:46:53 +00:00
Taewook Oh 7646e77969 [ThinLTO] Add funtions in callees metadata to CallGraphEdges
Summary:
If there's a callees metadata attached to the indirect call instruction, add CallGraphEdges to the callees mentioned in the metadata when computing FunctionSummary.

* Why this is necessary:
Consider following code example:
```
(foo.c)
static int f1(int x) {...}
static int f2(int x);
static int (*fptr)(int) = f2;
static int f2(int x) {
  if (x) fptr=f1; return f1(x);
}
int foo(int x) {
  (*fptr)(x); // !callees metadata of !{i32 (i32)* @f1, i32 (i32)* @f2} would be attached to this call.
}

(bar.c)
int bar(int x) {
  return foo(x);
}
```

At LTO time when `foo.o` is imported into `bar.o`, function `foo` might be inlined into `bar` and PGO-guided indirect call promotion will run after that. If the profile data tells that the promotion of `@f1` or `@f2` is beneficial, the optimizer will check if the "promoted" `@f1` or `@f2` (such as `@f1.llvm.0` or `@f2.llvm.0`) is available. Without this patch, importing `!callees` metadata would only add promoted declarations of `@f1` and `@f2` to the `bar.o`, but still the optimizer will assume that the function is available and perform the promotion. The result of that is link failure with `undefined reference to @f1.llvm.0`.

This patch fixes this problem by adding callees in the `!callees` metadata to CallGraphEdges so that their definition would be properly imported into.

One may ask that there already is a logic to add indirect call promotion targets to be added to CallGraphEdges. However, if profile data says "indirect call promotion is only beneficial under a certain inline context", the logic wouldn't work. In the code example above, if profile data is like
```
bar:1000000:100000
  1:100000
    1: foo:100000
        1: 100000 f1:100000
```
, Computing FunctionSummary for `foo.o` wouldn't add `foo->f1` to CallGraphEdges. (Also, it is at least "possible" that one can provide profile data to only link step but not to compilation step).

Reviewers: tejohnson, mehdi_amini, pcc

Reviewed By: tejohnson

Subscribers: inglorion, eraman, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44399

llvm-svn: 327358
2018-03-13 04:26:58 +00:00