The revert was a misfire.
Remove the temporary flag PGSOIRPassOrTestOnly and the guard code which was used
for the staged rollout. This is a cleanup (NFC) as it's now false by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84057
Summary:
In the function `target`, memory deallocation and `target_data_end` is called
immediately returning from launching kernel. This might cause a race condition
that the corresponding memory is still being used by the kernel and a potential
issue that when the kernel starts to execute, its required data have already
been deallocated, especially when multiple kernels running concurrently. Since
nevertheless, we will block the thread issuing the target offloading at the end
of the target, we just move the synchronization ahead a little bit to make sure
the correctness.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, openmp-commits
Tags: #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84381
This patch refactors the range list table to hold both the range list
table and the location list table.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84239
Summary:
llvm is missing support for DW_OP_implicit_value operation.
DW_OP_implicit_value op is indispensable for cases such as
optimized out long double variables.
For intro refer: DWARFv5 Spec Pg: 40 2.6.1.1.4 Implicit Location Descriptions
Consider the following example:
```
int main() {
long double ld = 3.14;
printf("dummy\n");
ld *= ld;
return 0;
}
```
when compiled with tunk `clang` as
`clang test.c -g -O1` produces following location description
of variable `ld`:
```
DW_AT_location (0x00000000:
[0x0000000000201691, 0x000000000020169b): DW_OP_constu 0xc8f5c28f5c28f800, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_piece 0x8, DW_OP_constu 0x4000, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x10 0x40, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("ld")
```
Here one may notice that this representation is incorrect(DWARF4
stack could only hold integers(and only up to the size of address)).
Here the variable size itself is `128` bit.
GDB and LLDB confirms this:
```
(gdb) p ld
$1 = <invalid float value>
(lldb) frame variable ld
(long double) ld = <extracting data from value failed>
```
GCC represents/uses DW_OP_implicit_value in these sort of situations.
Based on the discussion with Jakub Jelinek regarding GCC's motivation
for using this, I concluded that DW_OP_implicit_value is most appropriate
in this case.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-July/233057.html
GDB seems happy after this patch:(LLDB doesn't have support
for DW_OP_implicit_value)
```
(gdb) p ld
p ld
$1 = 3.14000000000000012434
```
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
A malloc implementation may return a pointer to some allocated space. It is
undefined for libclang_rt.profile- to access the object - which actually happens
in instrumentTargetValueImpl, where ValueCounters[CounterIndex] may access a
ValueProfNode (from another allocated object) and crashes when the code accesses
the object referenced by CurVNode->Next.
Summary:
This patch fix a problem where clause needed to be in the allowed set even
they were in the required set. A required clause is allowed obvisouly. This allow
to remove the duplicate in OMP.td
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan, DavidTruby, richard.barton.arm, jdoerfert, sscalpone, kiranktp, ichoyjx
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84353
It turns out that COMPLEX formatted input needs its own runtime APIs
so that null values in list-directed input skip the entire COMPLEX
datum rather than just a real or imaginary part thereof.
Reviewed By: sscalpone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84370
add_compile_options is more sensitive to its location in the file than add_definitions--it only takes effect for sources that are added after it. This updated patch ensures that the add_compile_options is done before adding any source files that depend on it.
Using add_definitions caused the flag to be passed to rc.exe on Windows and thus broke Windows builds.
We deprecated mpx feature in 10.0. I left this feature flag
in case someone still had IR files containing the feature
in a target-feature attribute. At the time I think I thought it
would fail the test if the feature couldn't be found. Further
review suggests that at worst it prints a message to
stderr about ignoring the feature.
LLVM_TARGET_ARCH is not exported by LLVM so we can't use it from
standalone builds. Default to the architecture in LLVM_HOST_TRIPLE when
no LLDB_DEFAULT_TEST_ARCH was specified.
SAHF/LAHF instructions are always available in 32-bit mode. Early
64-bit capable CPUs made the undefined opcodes in 64-bit mode. This
was changed on later CPUs.
We have a feature flag to control our usage of these instructions.
This feature flag is hooked up to a clang command line option
-msahf/-mno-sahf specifically to give control of the 64-bit mode
behavior.
In the backend X86Subtarget constructor we were explicitly forcing
+sahf into the feature flag string if we were not compiling for
64-bit mode. This was intended to make the predicates always allow
the instructions outside of 64-bit mode. Unfortunately, the way
it was placed into the string allowed -mno-sahf from clang to disable
SAHF instructions in 32-bit mode. This causes an assertion to fire
if you compile a floating point comparison with something like
"-march=pentium -mno-sahf" as our floating point comparison
handling on CPUs that don't support FCOMI/FUCOMI instructions
requires SAHF.
To fix this, this commit restricts the feature flag to only apply to
64-bit mode by ignoring the flag outside 64-bit mode in
X86Subtarget::hasLAHFSAHF(). This way we don't need to mess with
the feature string at all.
Summary:
Support fast16labels in `dfsan_has_label`, and print an error for all
other API functions.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka, pcc
Reviewed By: kcc
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84215
TPCDynamicLibrarySearchGenerator uses a TargetProcessControl instance to
load libraries and search for symbol addresses in a target process. It
can be used in place of a DynamicLibrarySearchGenerator to enable
target-process agnostic lookup.
This reverts commit 4a539faf74.
There is a __llvm_profile_instrument_range related crash in PGO-instrumented clang:
```
(gdb) bt
llvm::ConstantRange const&, llvm::APInt const&, unsigned int, bool) ()
llvm::ScalarEvolution::getRangeForAffineAR(llvm::SCEV const*, llvm::SCEV
const*, llvm::SCEV const*, unsigned int) ()
```
(The body of __llvm_profile_instrument_range is inlined, so we can only find__llvm_profile_instrument_target in the trace)
```
23│ 0x000055555dba0961 <+65>: nopw %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
24│ 0x000055555dba096b <+75>: nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
25│ 0x000055555dba0970 <+80>: mov %rsi,%rbx
26│ 0x000055555dba0973 <+83>: mov 0x8(%rsi),%rsi # %rsi=-1 -> SIGSEGV
27│ 0x000055555dba0977 <+87>: cmp %r15,(%rbx)
28│ 0x000055555dba097a <+90>: je 0x55555dba0a76 <__llvm_profile_instrument_target+342>
```
Previously, the vins*vlx instructions were incorrectly defined with i64 as the
second argument. This patches fixes this issue by correcting the second argument
of the vins*vlx instructions/intrinsics to be i32.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84277
The input to these functions is a StringRef. We then convert it
to a std::string. Then maybe replace with "generic". I think we
can just overwrite the incoming StringRef with "generic" if needed
and then pass it along without creating any std::string.
- Eliminate `From` which is 0 most of the times.
- Replace 'find_first_of('{') != 0' with 'front() != '{'
- Simplify the loop body given the it executes only when front() == '}'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84178
- Update documentation to clarify that `}` does not need to be doubled up.
- Update `EscapedBrace` test case to test this behavior
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83888
This patch includes the supporting code that enables always
instrumenting the function entry block by default.
This patch will NOT the default behavior.
It adds a variant bit in the profile version, adds new directives in
text profile format, and changes llvm-profdata tool accordingly.
This patch is a split of D83024 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D83024)
Many test changes from D83024 are also included.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84261
This patch refactors a small part of the Super Vectorizer code to
a utility so that it can be used independently from the pass. This
aligns vectorization with other utilities that we already have for loop
transformations, such as fusion, interchange, tiling, etc.
Reviewed By: nicolasvasilache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84289
This reverts commit e64afefdf8. It caused
a PGO bootstrapped clang to crash on many source files.
`__llvm_profile_instrument_range` seems to trigger a null pointer dereference.
Call stack:
__llvm_profile_instrument_range
llvm::APInt::udiv(llvm::APInt const&) const
getRangeForAffineARHelper
Summary: These should have half float as the element type
Reviewers: cameron.mcinally, efriedma, sdesmalen, paulwalker-arm
Reviewed By: paulwalker-arm
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84211
This is an alternative proposal to D81476 (and D82084) - the details were sufficiently confusing to me it seemed easier to write some code and see how it looks.
Reviewers: SouraVX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84278
`__llvm_profile_instrument_memop` transitively calls calloc, thus calloc
should not be instrumented.
I saw a
`calloc -> __llvm_profile_instrument_memop -> calloc -> __llvm_profile_instrument_memop -> ...`
infinite loop leading to stack overflow
when the malloc implementation (e.g. tcmalloc) is built and instrumented along with the application.
We should figure out the library calls which may be instrumented and disable
their instrumentation before rolling out this change.
Reviewed By: yamauchi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84358
And adjust the indbrtest4 test to actually test what it's supposed
to. BB1 is supposed to be eliminated here, but isn't, because
BB0 still branches to it. This was lost due to the incomplete CHECK
lines.
I was trying to pick this up a bit when reviewing D48426 (& perhaps D69778) - in any case, looks like D48426 added a module level flag that might not be needed.
The D48426 implementation worked by setting a module level flag, then code generating contents from the PCH a special case in ASTContext::DeclMustBeEmitted would be used to delay emitting the definition of these functions if they came from a Module with this flag.
This strategy is similar to the one initially implemented for modular codegen that was removed in D29901 in favor of the modular decls list and a bit on each decl to specify whether it's homed to a module.
One major difference between PCH object support and modular code generation, other than the specific list of decls that are homed, is the compilation model: MSVC PCH modules are built into the object file for some other source file (when compiling that source file /Yc is specified to say "this compilation is where the PCH is homed"), whereas modular code generation invokes a separate compilation for the PCH alone. So the current modular code generation test of to decide if a decl should be emitted "is the module where this decl is serialized the current main file" has to be extended (as Lubos did in D69778) to also test the command line flag -building-pch-with-obj.
Otherwise the whole thing is basically streamlined down to the modular code generation path.
This even offers one extra material improvement compared to the existing divergent implementation: Homed functions are not emitted into object files that use the pch. Instead at -O0 they are not emitted into the IR at all, and at -O1 they are emitted using available_externally (existing functionality implemented for modular code generation). The pch-codegen test has been updated to reflect this new behavior.
[If possible: I'd love it if we could not have the extra MSVC-style way of accessing dllexport-pch-homing, and just do it the modular codegen way, but I understand that it might be a limitation of existing build systems. @hans / @thakis: Do either of you know if it'd be practical to move to something more similar to .pcm handling, where the pch itself is passed to the compilation, rather than homed as a side effect of compiling some other source file?]
Reviewers: llunak, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83652
Hiroshi Yamauchi