Currently we do not represent runtime preemption in the IR, which has several
drawbacks:
1) The semantics of GlobalValues differ depending on the object file format
you are targeting (as well as the relocation-model and -fPIE value).
2) We have no way of disabling inlining of run time interposable functions,
since in the IR we only know if a function is link-time interposable.
Because of this llvm cannot support elf-interposition semantics.
3) In LTO builds of executables we will have extra knowledge that a symbol
resolved to a local definition and can't be preemptable, but have no way to
propagate that knowledge through the compiler.
This patch adds preemptability specifiers to the IR with the following meaning:
dso_local --> means the compiler may assume the symbol will resolve to a
definition within the current linkage unit and the symbol may be accessed
directly even if the definition is not within this compilation unit.
dso_preemptable --> means that the compiler must assume the GlobalValue may be
replaced with a definition from outside the current linkage unit at runtime.
To ease transitioning dso_preemptable is treated as a 'default' in that
low-level codegen will still do the same checks it did previously to see if a
symbol should be accessed indirectly. Eventually when IR producers emit the
specifiers on all Globalvalues we can change dso_preemptable to mean 'always
access indirectly', and remove the current logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20217
llvm-svn: 316668
Summary:
We no longer add vectors of pointers as candidates for
load/store vectorization. It does not seem to work anyway,
but without this patch we can end up in asserts when trying
to create casts between an integer type and the pointer of
vectors type.
The test case I've added used to assert like this when trying to
cast between i64 and <2 x i16*>:
opt: ../lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:2565: Assertion `castIsValid(op, S, Ty) && "Invalid cast!"' failed.
#0 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*)
#1 SignalHandler(int)
#2 __restore_rt
#3 __GI_raise
#4 __GI_abort
#5 __GI___assert_fail
#6 llvm::CastInst::Create(llvm::Instruction::CastOps, llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Instruction*)
#7 llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter>::CreateBitOrPointerCast(llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&)
#8 Vectorizer::vectorizeStoreChain(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Instruction*>, llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::Instruction*, 16u>*)
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39296
llvm-svn: 316665
Summary:
The code comments indicate that no effort has been spent on
handling load/stores when the size isn't a multiple of the
byte size correctly. However, the code only avoided types
smaller than 8 bits. So for example a load of an i28 could
still be considered as a candidate for vectorization.
This patch adjusts the code to behave according to the code
comment.
The test case used to hit the following assert when
trying to use "cast" an i32 to i28 using CreateBitOrPointerCast:
opt: ../lib/IR/Instructions.cpp:2565: Assertion `castIsValid(op, S, Ty) && "Invalid cast!"' failed.
#0 PrintStackTraceSignalHandler(void*)
#1 SignalHandler(int)
#2 __restore_rt
#3 __GI_raise
#4 __GI_abort
#5 __GI___assert_fail
#6 llvm::CastInst::Create(llvm::Instruction::CastOps, llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&, llvm::Instruction*)
#7 llvm::IRBuilder<llvm::ConstantFolder, llvm::IRBuilderDefaultInserter>::CreateBitOrPointerCast(llvm::Value*, llvm::Type*, llvm::Twine const&)
#8 (anonymous namespace)::Vectorizer::vectorizeLoadChain(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Instruction*>, llvm::SmallPtrSet<llvm::Instruction*, 16u>*)
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39295
llvm-svn: 316663
These instructions were previously marked as codegen only preventing
them from being assembled as microMIPS or disassembled.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39123
llvm-svn: 316656
PR35071 exposed the fact that MipsInstrInfo::removeBranch did not walk past
debug instructions when removing branches for the control flow optimizer, which
lead to duplicated conditional branches. If the target of the branch was a
removable block, only the conditional branch in the terminating position would
have it's MBB operands updated, leaving the first branch with a dangling MBB
operand. The MIPS long branch pass would then trigger an assertion when
attempting to examine the instruction with dangling MBB operand.
This resolves PR35071.
Thanks to Alex Richardson for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39288
llvm-svn: 316654
Currently a record-form instruction is used for comparison of "greater than -1" and "less than 1" by modifying the predicate (e.g. LT 1 into LE 0) in addition to the naive case of comparison against 0.
This patch also enables emitting a record-form instruction for "less than or equal to -1" (i.e. "less than 0") and "greater than or equal to 1" (i.e. "greater than 0") to increase the optimization opportunities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38941
llvm-svn: 316647
Add the option to lookup an address in the debug information and print
out the file, function, block and line table details.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38409
llvm-svn: 316619
Summary:
On FreeBSD11.0 the FileCheck NOT string "1.0" will be matched by
`.amd_amdgpu_isa "amdgcn-unknown-freebsd11.0--gfx802"` at the end of the
file. Add a CHECK for that directive to avoid failing the test.
Reviewers: rampitec, kzhuravl
Reviewed By: rampitec, kzhuravl
Subscribers: emaste, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39306
llvm-svn: 316616
Max backedge taken count is always expected to be a constant; and this is
usually true by construction -- it is a SCEV expression with constant inputs.
However, if the max backedge expression ends up being computed to be a udiv with
a constant zero denominator[0], SCEV does not fold the result to a constant
since there is no constant it can fold it to (SCEV has no representation for
"infinity" or "undef").
However, in computeMaxBECountForLT we already know the denominator is positive,
and thus at least 1; and we can use this fact to avoid dividing by zero.
[0]: We can end up with a constant zero denominator if the signed range of the
stride is more precise than the unsigned range.
llvm-svn: 316615
Add a CFI protection check that is implemented by building a graph and inspecting the output to deduce if the indirect CF instruction is CFI protected. Also added the output of this instruction to printIndirectInstructions().
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc, pcc, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38428
llvm-svn: 316610
Summary: Make sure shifts are legal/specified by the legalizerinfo before creating it
Reviewers: qcolombet, dsanders, rovka, t.p.northover
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39264
llvm-svn: 316602
In getOffsetRange, Max can be set to 0 to force the extender replacement
to be at or below the original value. This would cause the new offset to
be non-negative, which is preferred for memory instructions (to reduce
the likelihood of it getting constant-extended due to predication). The
problem happens when the range is shifted by an offset (present in the
instruction being examined) and the offset is negative. The entire range
for the allowable deviation will then be strictly negative. This creates
a problem, since 0 is assumed to be a valid deviation.
llvm-svn: 316601
As indicated by Table 1-1 in Intel Architecture Instruction Set Extensions and Future Features Programming Reference from October 2017.
llvm-svn: 316592
Summary: For some irreducible CFG the domtree nodes might be dead, do not update domtree for dead nodes.
Reviewers: kuhar, dberlin, hfinkel
Reviewed By: kuhar
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mcrosier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38960
llvm-svn: 316582
This patch adds a new pass for attaching !callees metadata to indirect call
sites. The pass propagates values to call sites by performing an IPSCCP-like
analysis using the generic sparse propagation solver. For indirect call sites
having a small set of possible callees, the attached metadata indicates what
those callees are. The metadata can be used to facilitate optimizations like
intersecting the function attributes of the possible callees, refining the call
graph, performing indirect call promotion, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37355
llvm-svn: 316576
In a case when number of output constraint operands that has matched input operands
doesn't fit to signed char, TargetLowering::ParseConstraints() can try to access
ConstraintOperands (that is std::vector) with negative index.
Reviewers: rampitec, arsenm
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39125
llvm-svn: 316574
Remove the G_FADD testcases from arm-legalizer.mir, they are covered by
arm-legalizer-fp.mir (I probably forgot to delete them when I created
that test).
llvm-svn: 316573
We were generating BLX for all the calls, which was incorrect in most
cases. Update ARMCallLowering to generate BL for direct calls, and BLX,
BX_CALL or BMOVPCRX_CALL for indirect calls.
llvm-svn: 316570
Separate the test cases that deal with calls from the rest of the IR
Translator tests.
We split into 2 different files, one for testing parameter and result
lowering, and one for testing the various different kinds of calls that
can occur (BL, BLX, BX_CALL etc).
llvm-svn: 316569
This patch allows SCEVFindUnsafe algorithm to tread division by any non-positive
value as safe. Previously, it could only recognize non-zero constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39228
llvm-svn: 316568
Compute the actual decomposition only after deciding whether to expand
of not. Else, it's easy to make the compiler OOM with:
`memcpy(dst, src, 0xffffffffffffffff);`, which typically happens if
someone mistakenly passes a negative value. Add a test.
This reverts commit f8fc02fbd4ab33383c010d33675acf9763d0bd44.
llvm-svn: 316567
This fixes possible out of bound access in
DWARFDie::getFirstChild()
which might happen when .debug_info section is corrupted,
like shown in testcase.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39185
llvm-svn: 316566
Swap the compare operands if the lhs is a shift and the rhs isn't,
as in arm and T2 the shift can be performed by the compare for its
second operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39004
llvm-svn: 316562
Duplicated code found in three places put into a new static function:
/// Given a Count of resource usage and a Latency value, return true if a
/// SchedBoundary becomes resource limited.
static bool checkResourceLimit(unsigned LFactor, unsigned Count,
unsigned Latency) {
return (int)(Count - (Latency * LFactor)) > (int)LFactor;
}
Review: Florian Hahn, Matthias Braun
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39235
llvm-svn: 316560
Previously, the dllimport attribute did the right thing in terms
of treating it as a pointer to a value, but this makes sure the
names get mangled properly, and calls to such functions load the
function from the __imp_ pointer.
This is based on SVN r212431 and r212430 where the same was
implemented for ARM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38530
llvm-svn: 316555
This code added in r297930 assumed that it could create
a select with a condition type that is just an integer
bitcast of the selected type. For AMDGPU any vselect is
going to be scalarized (although the vector types are legal),
and all select conditions must be i1 (the same as getSetCCResultType).
This logic doesn't really make sense to me, but there's
never really been a consistent policy in what the select
condition mask type is supposed to be. Try to extend
the logic for skipping the transform for condition types
that aren't setccs. It doesn't seem quite right to me though,
but checking conditions that seem more sensible (like whether the
vselect is going to be expanded) doesn't work since this
seems to depend on that also.
llvm-svn: 316554
IRCE for unsigned latch conditions was temporarily disabled by rL314881. The motivating
example contained an unsigned latch condition and a signed range check. One of the safe
iteration ranges was `[1, SINT_MAX + 1]`. Its right border was incorrectly interpreted as a negative
value in `IntersectRange` function, this lead to a miscompile under which we deleted a range check
without inserting a postloop where it was needed.
This patch brings back IRCE for unsigned latch conditions. Now we treat range intersection more
carefully. If the latch condition was unsigned, we only try to consider a range check for deletion if:
1. The range check is also unsigned, or
2. Safe iteration range of the range check lies within `[0, SINT_MAX]`.
The same is done for signed latch.
Values from `[0, SINT_MAX]` are unambiguous, these values are non-negative under any interpretation,
and all values of a range intersected with such range are also non-negative.
We also use signed/unsigned min/max functions for range intersection depending on type of the
latch condition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38581
llvm-svn: 316552
Balaram Makam