This removes the magic-number-esque code creating/retrieving the same
label for a debug_loc entry from two places and removes the last small
piece of reusable logic from emitDebugLoc so that there will be less
duplication when refactoring it into two functions (one for debug_loc,
the other for debug_loc.dwo).
llvm-svn: 205382
You can either provide the function name, or function body text.
Also propagate the compilation error up from where it is checked so we can report compilation errors.
<rdar://problem/9898371>
llvm-svn: 205380
insertElementAt()'s third parameter is not only unused but also ignored
if you pass Position::END. The actual meaning of the parameter was obscure.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3256
llvm-svn: 205376
Group class is designed for GNU LD's --start-group and --end-group. There's
no obvious need to have two classes for it -- one as an abstract base class
and the other as a concrete class.
llvm-svn: 205375
Seems we didn't have any test coverage for merging... awesome. So I
added some - but hit an llvm-objdump bug while I was there. I'm choosing
not to shave that yak right now.
Code review feedback/bug catch by Adrian Prantl in r205360.
llvm-svn: 205373
We don't want to encourage the code to emit a lexical block for
a function that needs one in order for the line table to change,
we need to grab the line information from the body of the pattern
that we were instantiated from, this code should do that.
Modify the test case to ensure that we're still looking in the
right place for all of the scopes and also that we haven't
created a lexical block where we didn't need one.
llvm-svn: 205368
No test case (this would invoke UB by examining uninitialized members,
etc, at best - and this code is apparently untested anyway - I'm about
to fix that)
Code review feedback from Adrian Prantl on r205360.
llvm-svn: 205367
InputGraph has too many knobs and controls that are not being used. This
patch is to remove dead code, unused features and a class. There are two
things that worth noting, besides simple dead code removal:
1. ControlNode class is removed. We had it as the base class of Group
class, but it provides no functionality particularly meaningful. We now
have shallower class hierarchy that is easier to understand.
2. InputGraph provides a feature to replace a node with its internal data.
It is being used to "expand" some type of node, such as a Linker Script
node, with its actual files. We used to have two options when replacing
it -- ExpandOnly or ExpandAndReplace. ExpandOnly was to expand it but not
remove the node from the tree. There is no use of that option in the code,
so it was a dead feature.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3252
llvm-svn: 205363
Asserting with cast<T> did not actually make much sense because there was no
need to use dynamic casting in the first place. We could make the compiler to
statically type check these objects.
llvm-svn: 205350
This provides an initial implementation of getUnrollingPreferences for x86.
getUnrollingPreferences is used by the generic (concatenation) unroller, which
is distinct from the unrolling done by the loop vectorizer. Many modern x86
cores have some kind of uop cache and loop-stream detector (LSD) used to
efficiently dispatch small loops, and taking full advantage of this requires
unrolling small loops (small here means 10s of uops).
These caches also have limits on the number of taken branches in the loop, and
so we also cap the loop unrolling factor based on the maximum "depth" of the
loop. This is currently calculated with a partial DFS traversal (partial
because it will stop early if the path length grows too much). This is still an
approximation, and one that is both conservative (because it does not account
for branches eliminated via block placement) and optimistic (because it is only
recording the maximum depth over minimum paths). Nevertheless, because the
loops that fit in these uop caches are so small, it is not clear how much the
details matter.
The original set of patches posted for review produced the following test-suite
performance results (from the TSVC benchmark) at that time:
ControlLoops-dbl - 13% speedup
ControlLoops-flt - 15% speedup
Reductions-dbl - 7.5% speedup
llvm-svn: 205348
In preparation for an upcoming commit implementing unrolling preferences for
x86, this adds additional fields to the UnrollingPreferences structure:
- PartialThreshold and PartialOptSizeThreshold - Like Threshold and
OptSizeThreshold, but used when not fully unrolling. These are necessary
because we need different thresholds for full unrolling from those used when
partially unrolling (the full unrolling thresholds are generally going to be
larger).
- MaxCount - A cap on the unrolling factor when partially unrolling. This can
be used by a target to prevent the unrolled loop from exceeding some
resource limit independent of the loop size (such as number of branches).
There should be no functionality change for any in-tree targets.
llvm-svn: 205347
The implementation of getUserCost had duplicated (and hard-coded) the default
logic in getGEPCost. Instead, it is better to use getGEPCost directly, which
limits the default logic to the implementation of one function, and allows
targets to override the behavior.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 205346
Identical to Win32 method except the GS segment register is used for TLS
instead of FS and pvArbitrary is at TEB offset 0x28 instead of 0x14.
llvm-svn: 205342
On FreeBSD ptrace(PT_KILL) is used to terminate the traced process
(as if PT_CONTINUE had been used with SIGKILL as the signal to be
delivered), and is the desired behaviour for ProcessPOSIX::DoDestroy.
On Linux, after ptrace(PTRACE_KILL) the traced process still exists
and can be interrogated. It is only upon resume that it exits as though
it received SIGKILL.
As the Linux PTRACE_KILL behaviour is not used by LLDB, rename
BringProcessIntoLimbo to Kill, and change the implementation to simply
call kill() instead of using ptrace.
Thanks to Todd F for testing (Ubuntu 12.04, gcc 4.8.2).
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3159
llvm-svn: 205337
cast<X> asserts the type is correct and does not return null on failure.
So we should use cast<X> rather than dyn_cast<X> at such places where we
don't expect type conversion could fail.
llvm-svn: 205332
Rui Ueyama