This broke the check-profile tests on Mac, see comment on the code
review.
> This is no longer needed, we can add __llvm_profile_runtime directly
> to llvm.compiler.used or llvm.used to achieve the same effect.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98325
This reverts commit c7712087cb.
Also reverting the dependent follow-up commit:
Revert "[InstrProfiling] Generate runtime hook for ELF platforms"
> When using -fprofile-list to selectively apply instrumentation only
> to certain files or functions, we may end up with a binary that doesn't
> have any counters in the case where no files were selected. However,
> because on Linux and Fuchsia, we pass -u__llvm_profile_runtime, the
> runtime would still be pulled in and incur some non-trivial overhead,
> especially in the case when the continuous or runtime counter relocation
> mode is being used. A better way would be to pull in the profile runtime
> only when needed by declaring the __llvm_profile_runtime symbol in the
> translation unit only when needed.
>
> This approach was already used prior to 9a041a7522, but we changed it
> to always generate the __llvm_profile_runtime due to a TAPI limitation.
> Since TAPI is only used on Mach-O platforms, we could use the early
> emission of __llvm_profile_runtime there, and on other platforms we
> could change back to the earlier approach where the symbol is generated
> later only when needed. We can stop passing -u__llvm_profile_runtime to
> the linker on Linux and Fuchsia since the generated undefined symbol in
> each translation unit that needed it serves the same purpose.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061
This reverts commit 87fd09b25f.
When using -fprofile-list to selectively apply instrumentation only
to certain files or functions, we may end up with a binary that doesn't
have any counters in the case where no files were selected. However,
because on Linux and Fuchsia, we pass -u__llvm_profile_runtime, the
runtime would still be pulled in and incur some non-trivial overhead,
especially in the case when the continuous or runtime counter relocation
mode is being used. A better way would be to pull in the profile runtime
only when needed by declaring the __llvm_profile_runtime symbol in the
translation unit only when needed.
This approach was already used prior to 9a041a7522, but we changed it
to always generate the __llvm_profile_runtime due to a TAPI limitation.
Since TAPI is only used on Mach-O platforms, we could use the early
emission of __llvm_profile_runtime there, and on other platforms we
could change back to the earlier approach where the symbol is generated
later only when needed. We can stop passing -u__llvm_profile_runtime to
the linker on Linux and Fuchsia since the generated undefined symbol in
each translation unit that needed it serves the same purpose.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98061
I originally requested this to be tested in D25263 but in the end
forgot to make sure that it was done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28289
llvm-svn: 291389
Summary:
On my system, clang tries to invoke /path/to/arm-linux-androideabi-ld
as the linker for Android, and the regex inside the test file considers
this as unacceptable.
Reviewers: samsonov
Subscribers: tberghammer, aemerson, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8598
llvm-svn: 233211
Summary:
This was already done for the sanitizers, but it needs to be done for
the profile and builtin libs as well.
Reviewers: srhines, timmurray, eugenis, samsonov
Reviewed By: samsonov
Subscribers: compnerd, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7187
llvm-svn: 227392
when specifying --coverage (or related) flags.
The system for doing this was based on the old LLVM-hosted profile_rt
library, and hadn't been updated for Linux to use the new compiler-rt
library. Also, it couldn't possibly work on multiarch or biarch systems
in many cases. The whole thing now works much the same as the sanitizer
libraries that are built and used out of the compiler-rt repo.
Note that other target OSes haven't been updated because I don't know if
they're doing anything special with the installation path of profile_rt.
I suspect however that *all* of these are wrong and would encourage
maintainers of each target to take a hard look at how compiler-rt
runtime libraries are linked on their platforms.
llvm-svn: 184666
Hans Wennborg