This should hopefully have fixed the stage2/stage3 miscompare on the dragonegg
testers.
"LoopVectorize: Use the dependence test utility class
We now no longer need alias analysis - the cases that alias analysis would
handle are now handled as accesses with a large dependence distance.
We can now vectorize loops with simple constant dependence distances.
for (i = 8; i < 256; ++i) {
a[i] = a[i+4] * a[i+8];
}
for (i = 8; i < 256; ++i) {
a[i] = a[i-4] * a[i-8];
}
We would be able to vectorize about 200 more loops (in many cases the cost model
instructs us no to) in the test suite now. Results on x86-64 are a wash.
I have seen one degradation in ammp. Interestingly, the function in which we
now vectorize a loop is never executed so we probably see some instruction
cache effects. There is a 2% improvement in h264ref. There is one or the other
TSCV loop kernel that speeds up.
radar://13681598"
llvm-svn: 184724
This adds instruction patterns to cover the generic forms of
the conditional branch instructions. This allows the assembler
to support the generic mnemonics.
The compiler will still generate the various specific forms
of the instruction that were already supported.
llvm-svn: 184722
There is currently only limited support for the "absolute" variants
of branch instructions. This patch adds support for the absolute
variants of all branches that are currently otherwise supported.
This requires adding new fixup types so that the correct variant
of relocation type can be selected by the object writer.
While the compiler will continue to usually choose the relative
branch variants, this will allow the asm parser to fully support
the absolute branches, with either immediate (numerical) or
symbolic target addresses.
No change in code generation intended.
llvm-svn: 184721
The method significandParts() is a helper method meant to ease access to
APFloat's significand by allowing the user to not need to be aware of whether or
not the APFloat is using memory allocated in the instance itself or in an
external array.
This assert says that one can only access the significand of FiniteNonZero/NaN
floats. This makes it cumbersome and more importantly dangerous when one wishes
to zero out the significand of a zero/infinity value since one will have to deal
with the aforementioned quandary related to how the memory in APFloat is
allocated.
llvm-svn: 184711
In the context of APFloat, seeing a macro called convolve suggests that APFloat
is using said value in some sort of convolution somewhere in the source code.
This is misleading.
I also added a documentation comment to the macro.
llvm-svn: 184710
CGSCC pass manager. This should insulate the inlining decisions from the
vectorization decisions, however it may have both compile time and code
size problems so it is just an experimental option right now.
Adding this based on a discussion with Arnold and it seems at least
worth having this flag for us to both run some experiments to see if
this strategy is workable. It may solve some of the regressions seen
with the loop vectorizer.
llvm-svn: 184698
There is some hope of eventually supporting a unified build with it, but
until then this lets me (and others) check it out in this location
without things breaking.
llvm-svn: 184697
constructing a lookup table.
Previously, buildLookup would add lookup table entries for each item lexically
within the DC, and adding the first entry with a given name would trigger the
external source to add all its entries with that name. Then buildLookup would
carry on and re-add those entries all over again.
Instead, follow a simple rule: a declaration from an external source is only
ever made visible by the external source. One exception to this: since we don't
usually build a lookup table for the TU in C, and we never serialize one, we
don't expect the external source to provide lookups in the TU in C, so we build
those ones ourselves.
llvm-svn: 184696
There's still a problem here - since we're not appropriately using the
signedness/range of the enum to chooset the encoding and emission of
enumerators, but GCC has some bugs around this too so I assume that's
not /such/ a high priority though I may get to it soon out of
completeness.
llvm-svn: 184695