iAs listed in the summary D77846, we have 5 different categories of bugs we're
checking for in CallAndMessage. I think the documentation placed in the code
explains my thought process behind my decisions quite well.
A non-obvious change I had here is removing the entry for
CallAndMessageUnInitRefArg. In fact, I removed the CheckerNameRef typed field
back in D77845 (it was dead code), so that checker didn't really exist in any
meaningful way anyways.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77866
NoDebug attr does not totally eliminate debug info about a function when
inlining is enabled. This is inconsistent with when inlining is disabled.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79967
The patch aims to use CallEvents interface in a more principled manner, and also
to highlight what this checker really does. It in fact checks for 5 different
kinds of errors (from checkPreCall, that is):
* Invalid function pointer related errors
* Call of methods from an invalid C++ this object
* Function calls with incorrect amount of parameters
* Invalid arguments for operator delete
* Pass of uninitialized values to pass-by-value parameters
In a previous patch I complained that this checker is responsible for emitting
a lot of different diagnostics all under core.CallAndMessage's name, and this
patch shows where we could start to assign different diagnostics to different
entities.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77846
Summary:
The predefined styles that clang-format supports are listed in two
places, and neither is up-to-date. GNU style isn't mentioned at all!
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80309
Summary:
This revision is to complement {D75791} so we can be sure that we don't change any default behavior.
For now just add rules to cover AfterExternBlock, but in the future we should add cases to cover the other BraceWrapping rules for each style. This will help guard us when we change code inside of the various getXXXStyle() functions to ensure we are not breaking everyone.
Reviewed By: MarcusJohnson91
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https:
Summary:
No need to generate inlined OpenMP region for variables captured in
lambdas or block decls, only for implicitly captured variables in the
OpenMP region.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, cfe-commits, caomhin
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79966
Summary:
Asm goto is not supported by SLH. Warn if an instance of asm goto is detected
while SLH is enabled.
Test included.
Reviewed By: jyu2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79743
Fixes "Use of uninitialized value $ScanView in exec" error on systems
with scan-view executable not located in the expected place.
Patch by Oliver Tušla!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77880
Summary:
Stream functions `fread` and `fwrite` are evaluated
and preconditions checked.
A new bug type is added for a (non fatal) warning if `fread`
is called in EOF state.
Reviewers: Szelethus, NoQ, dcoughlin, baloghadamsoftware, martong, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Subscribers: rnkovacs, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80015
Summary:
Its currently not possible to recreate the GNU style using the `BreakBeforeBraces: Custom` style due to a lack of missing `BeforeWhile` in the `BraceWrappingFlags`
The following request was raised to add `BeforeWhile` in a `do..while` context like `BeforeElse` and `BeforeCatch` to give greater control over the positioning of the `while`
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42164
Reviewers: krasimir, mitchell-stellar, sammccall
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79325
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33890
This revision allow the microsoft `for each(.... in ...` nonstandard C++ extension which can be used in C++/CLI to be handled as a ForEach macro.
This prevents the breaking between the for and each onto a new line
Reviewed By: JakeMerdichAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80228
Summary:
The following revision follows D80115 since @MyDeveloperDay and I apparently both had the same idea at the same time, for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 and my efforts on tooling support for AMDVLK, respectively.
This option aligns adjacent bitfield separators across lines, in a manner similar to AlignConsecutiveAssignments and friends.
Example:
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
would become
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
This also handles c++2a style bitfield-initializers with AlignConsecutiveAssignments.
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1 = 0;
uint32_t exponent : 8 = 127;
uint32_t mantissa : 23 = 0;
}; // defaults to 1.0f
```
Things this change does not do:
- Align multiple comma-chained bitfield variables. None of the other
AlignConsecutive* options seem to implement that either.
- Detect bitfields that have a width specified with something other
than a numeric literal (ie, `int a : SOME_MACRO;`). That'd be fairly
difficult to parse and is rare.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80176
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43845
When a '//comment' trails a consecutive alignment, it adds a whitespace
replacement within the comment token. This wasn't handled correctly in
the alignment code, which treats it as a whole token and thus double
counts it.
This can wrongly trigger the "line too long, it'll wrap" alignment-break
condition with specific lengths, causing the alignment to break for
seemingly no reason.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: kostyakozko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79465
If we're going to assume references are dereferenceable, we should also
assume they're aligned: otherwise, we can't actually dereference them.
See also D80072.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80166
Exactly what it says on the tin! This is clearly not the end of the road in this
direction, the parameters could be merged far more with the use of CallEvent or
a better value type in the CallDescriptionMap, but this was shockingly difficult
enough on its own. I expect that simplifying the file further will be far easier
moving forward.
The end goal is to research how we could create a more mature checker
interaction infrastructure for more complicated C++ modeling, and I'm pretty
sure that being able successfully split up our giants is the first step in this
direction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75432
The title and the included test file sums everything up -- the only thing I'm
mildly afraid of is whether anyone actually depends on the weird behavior of
HTMLDiagnostics pretending to be TextDiagnostics if an output directory is not
supplied. If it is, I guess we would need to resort to tiptoeing around the
compatibility flag.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76510
Party based on this thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-February/064754.html.
This patch merges two of CXXAllocatorCall's parameters, so that we are able to
supply a CallEvent object to check::NewAllocatorCall (see the description of
D75430 to see why this would be great).
One of the things mentioned by @NoQ was the following:
I think at this point we might actually do a good job sorting out this
check::NewAllocator issue because we have a "separate" "Environment" to hold
the other SVal, which is "objects under construction"! - so we should probably
simply teach CXXAllocatorCall to extract the value from the
objects-under-construction trait of the program state and we're good.
I had MallocChecker in my crosshair for now, so I admittedly threw together
something as a proof of concept. Now that I know that this effort is worth
pursuing though, I'll happily look for a solution better then demonstrated in
this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75431
The following series of patches has something similar in mind with D77474, with
the same goal to finally end incorrect checker names for good. Despite
CallAndMessage not suffering from this particular issue, it is a dependency for
many other checkers, which is problematic, because we don't really want
dependencies to also emit diagnostics (reasoning for this is also more detailed
in D77474).
CallAndMessage also has another problem, namely that it is responsible for a lot
of reports. You'll soon learn that this isn't really easy to solve for
compatibility reasons, but that is the topic of followup patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77845
D35259 introduced a case where complex types of non-long-double would
result in FI.getReturnInfo() to not be initialized properly. This
resulted in a crash under some very specific circumstances when
dereferencing the LLVMContext.
This patch makes sure that these types have the intended getReturnInfo
initialization.
It was enabled by default accidentally; still missing some important
features. Also it needs a better package because it doesn't boil down to
API modeling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80213
Summary:
This reflects changes in the spec proposal made since basic arithmetic
was first implemented.
Reviewers: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80174
When I fixed the targets specific builtins to make sure that aux-targets
are checked, it seems I didn't consider cases where the builtins check
the target info for further info. This patch bubbles the target-info
down to the individual checker functions to ensure that they validate
against the aux-target as well.
For non-aux-target invocations, this is an NFC.
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45614
`[[nodiscard]]` after a macro doesn't behave the same as an __attribute__ resulting in incorrect indentation
This revision corrects that behavior
See original Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629756
Before:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult
FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
After:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79990
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44476
```template <typename T> [[nodiscard]] int a() { return 1; }```
gets incorrectly formatted to be
```template <typename T>[[nodiscard]] int a() { return 1; }```
This revision ensure there is a space between the template and the attribute
Reviewed By: JakeMerdichAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79905
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
With Chromium style (although that is not important) its just it defines PointerAligmment: Left
The following arguments `S&&` are formatted differently depending on if the class has an attribute between it and the class identifier
```
class S {
S(S&&) = default;
};
class [[nodiscard]] S {
S(S &&) = default;
};
```
The prescense of [[nodiscard]] between the `class/struct` and the `{` causes the `{` to be incorrectly seen as a `TT_FunctionLBrace` which in turn transforms all the && to be `TT_BinaryOperators` rather than `TT_PointerOrReference`, as binary operators other spacing rules come into play causing a miss format
This revision resolves this by allowing the parseRecord to consider the [[nodisscard]]
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80008
Summary:
Created AIXABIInfo and AIXTargetCodeGenInfo for AIX ABI.
Reviewed By: Xiangling_L, ZarkoCA
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79035
Jan Korous