There are two cases:
1. The library has all it needs to provide align_val_t and the
new/delete overloads needed to support aligned allocation.
2. The compiler has actually turned the language feature on.
There are times where libc++ needs to distinguish between the two.
This patch adds the additional macro
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_LIBRARY_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION which denotes when case (1)
does not hold. _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION is defined whenever
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_LIBRARY_ALIGNED_ALLOCATION is defined, or when the
compiler has not enabled the language feature.
Additionally this patch cleans up a number of other macros related
to detection of aligned allocation machinery.
llvm-svn: 344207
Summary:
These deprecation warnings are opt-in: they are only enabled when the
_LIBCXX_DEPRECATION_WARNINGS macro is defined, which is not the case
by default. Note that this is a first step in the right direction, but
I wasn't able to get an exhaustive list of all deprecated components
per standard, so there's certainly stuff that's missing. The list of
components this commit marks as deprecated is:
in C++11:
- auto_ptr, auto_ptr_ref
- binder1st, binder2nd, bind1st(), bind2nd()
- pointer_to_unary_function, pointer_to_binary_function, ptr_fun()
- mem_fun_t, mem_fun1_t, const_mem_fun_t, const_mem_fun1_t, mem_fun()
- mem_fun_ref_t, mem_fun1_ref_t, const_mem_fun_ref_t, const_mem_fun1_ref_t, mem_fun_ref()
in C++14:
- random_shuffle()
in C++17:
- unary_negate, binary_negate, not1(), not2()
<rdar://problem/18168350>
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48912
llvm-svn: 342843
Summary:
The `[[nodiscard]]` attribute is intended to help users find bugs where
function return values are ignored when they shouldn't be. After C++17 the
C++ standard has started to declared such library functions as `[[nodiscard]]`.
However, this application is limited and applies only to dialects after C++17.
Users who want help diagnosing misuses of STL functions may desire a more
liberal application of `[[nodiscard]]`.
For this reason libc++ provides an extension that does just that! The
extension must be enabled by defining `_LIBCPP_ENABLE_NODISCARD`. The extended
applications of `[[nodiscard]]` takes two forms:
1. Backporting `[[nodiscard]]` to entities declared as such by the
standard in newer dialects, but not in the present one.
2. Extended applications of `[[nodiscard]]`, at the libraries discretion,
applied to entities never declared as such by the standard.
Users may also opt-out of additional applications `[[nodiscard]]` using
additional macros.
Applications of the first form, which backport `[[nodiscard]]` from a newer
dialect may be disabled using macros specific to the dialect it was added. For
example `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_AFTER_CXX17`.
Applications of the second form, which are pure extensions, may be disabled
by defining `_LIBCPP_DISABLE_NODISCARD_EXT`.
This patch was originally written by me (Roman Lebedev),
then but then reworked by Eric Fiselier.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, thakis, EricWF
Reviewed By: thakis, EricWF
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mclow.lists, lebedev.ri, EricWF, rjmccall, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits, christof
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45179
llvm-svn: 342808
This constructor needs to cast a pointer to uninitialized
memory to a pointer to object type in order to call
allocator_traits::construct(). This cast is not allowed when CFI cast
checks are enabled.
I did this instead of marking __addr() as _LIBCPP_NO_CFI so that we
don't lose CFI checks on get() or the dtor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50743
llvm-svn: 339797
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
This patch fixes std::allocator, and more specifically, all users
of __libcpp_allocate and __libcpp_deallocate, to support over-aligned
types.
__libcpp_allocate/deallocate now take an alignment parameter, and when
the specified alignment is greater than that supported by malloc/new,
the aligned version of operator new is called (assuming it's available).
When aligned new isn't available, the old behavior has been kept, and the
alignment parameter is ignored.
This patch depends on recent changes to __builtin_operator_new/delete which
allow them to be used to call any regular new/delete operator. By using
__builtin_operator_new/delete when possible, the new/delete erasure optimization
is maintained.
llvm-svn: 328180
The specification of this function mandates a cast to uninitialized
T*, which is forbidden under CFI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42146
llvm-svn: 322744
The commit r300140 changed the implementation of compressed_pair, but didn't add
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY to the constructors and get members of the
compressed_pair_elem class. This patch adds the visibility annotation.
I didn't find a way to test this change with libc++ regression tests.
rdar://35352579
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39751
llvm-svn: 317816
There were a number of cases where __double_underscore functions,
for example __has_construct_test, were called without being qualified,
causing ADL to occur. This patch qualifies those calls to avoid this
problem.
Thanks to David L. Jones for point out the issue initially.
llvm-svn: 313324
Summary:
This patch improves how libc++ handles min/max macros within the headers. Previously libc++ would undef them and emit a warning.
This patch changes libc++ to use `#pragma push_macro` to save the macro before undefining it, and `#pragma pop_macro` to restore the macros and the end of the header.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, bcraig, compnerd, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, krytarowski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33080
llvm-svn: 304357
Summary:
This patch fixes bugs.llvm.org/PR32979.
[util.smartptr.shared.const] says:
> In the constructor definitions below, enables shared_from_this with p, for a pointer p of type Y*, means
> that if Y has an unambiguous and accessible base class that is a specialization of enable_shared_from_-
> this.
This means that libc++ needs to respect the access specifier of the base class, and not attempt to construct
and enabled_shared_from_this base if it is private. However access specifiers don't affect overload resolution
so our current implementation will attempt to construct the private base.
This patch uses SFINAE to correctly detect if the shared_ptr input has an accessible enable_shared_from_this
base class.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33033
llvm-svn: 302709
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
This patch overhauls both specializations of unique_ptr while implementing
the following LWG issues:
* LWG 2801 - This issue constrains unique_ptr's constructors when the deleter type
is not default constructible. Additionally it adds SFINAE conditions
to unique_ptr<T[]>::unique_ptr(Up).
* LWG 2905 - This issue reworks the unique_ptr(pointer, /* see below */ deleter)
constructors so that they correctly SFINAE when the deleter argument cannot
be used to construct the stored deleter.
* LWG 2520 - This issue fixes initializing unique_ptr<T[]> from nullptr.
Libc++ had previously implemented this issue, but the suggested resolution
still broke initialization from NULL. This patch re-works the
unique_ptr<T[]>(Up, deleter) overloads so that they accept NULL as well
as nullptr.
llvm-svn: 300406
Summary:
__compressed_pair takes and passes it's constructor arguments by value. This causes arguments to be moved 3 times instead of once. This patch addresses that issue and fixes `constexpr` on the constructors.
I would rather have this fix than D27564, and I'm fairly confident it's not ABI breaking but I'm not 100% sure.
I prefer this solution because it removes a lot of code and makes the implementation *much* smaller.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo
Reviewed By: K-ballo
Subscribers: K-ballo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27565
llvm-svn: 300140
For reference deleter types the const qualifier on the return type
of get_deleter() should be ignored, and a non-const deleter should
be returned.
This patch fixes a bug where "const deleter_type&" is incorrectly
formed.
llvm-svn: 300121
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
Eric Fiselier