Summary:
The state associated to the future was set in one thread (with synchronization)
but read in another thread without synchronization, which led to a data race.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38181
rdar://problem/42548261
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51170
llvm-svn: 340608
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Note that this commit had originally been applied in r336369 and then
reverted in r336382 because of unforeseen problems. Both of these problems
have now been fixed.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336866
This reverts commit r336369. The commit had two problems:
1. __pbump was marked as _LIBCPP_EXTERN_TEMPLATE_INLINE_VISIBILITY instead of
_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which lead to two symbols being added in the
dylib and the check-cxx-abilist failing.
2. The LLDB tests started failing because they undefine
`_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY`. I need to figure out why they do that and
fix the tests before we can go forward with this change.
llvm-svn: 336382
Summary:
We never actually mean to always inline a function -- all the uses of
the macro I could find are actually attempts to control the visibility
of symbols. This is better described by _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY, which
is actually always defined the same.
This change is orthogonal to the decision of what we're actually going
to do with _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY -- it just simplifies things by
having one canonical way of doing things.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, llvm-commits, dexonsmith, erikvanderpoel, mclow.lists
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48892
llvm-svn: 336369
Libc++ is used as a system library on macOS and iOS (amongst others). In order
for users to be able to compile a binary that is intended to be deployed to an
older version of the platform, clang provides the
availability attribute <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/AttributeReference.html#availability>_
that can be placed on declarations to describe the lifecycle of a symbol in the
library.
See docs/DesignDocs/AvailabilityMarkup.rst for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
llvm-svn: 302172
Summary:
Most classes annotated with _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS need to have at least some
of their members exported, otherwise we have a lot of link errors when
linking against a libc++ built with hidden visibility. This also makes
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS be consistent across platforms, since on Windows it
already exports members.
With this change made, any template methods of a class marked
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS will also get default visibility when instantiatied,
which is not desirable for clients of libc++ headers who wish to control
their visibility; this is the same issue as PR30642. Annotate all
problematic methods with an explicit visibility specifier to avoid this.
The problematic methods were found by running bad-visibility-finder [1]
against the libc++ headers after making the _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS change. The
small methods were marked for inlining; the larger ones hidden.
[1] https://github.com/smeenai/bad-visibility-finder
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25208
llvm-svn: 296732
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
This patch addresses the following issues in the test suite:
1. Move "std::bad_array_length" test from std/ to libcxx/ test directory
since the feature is not a part of the standard.
2. Rename "futures.tas" test directory to "futures.task" since that is the
correct stable name.
3. Move tests for "packaged_task<T>::result_type" from std/ to libcxx/
test directory since the typedef is a libc++ extension.
llvm-svn: 271430
This change moves visibility attributes from out-of-class method
definitions to in-class declaration. This is needed for a switch to
attribute((internal_linkage)) (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D13925)
which can only appear on the first declaration.
This change does not touch istream/ostream/streambuf. They are
handled separately in http://reviews.llvm.org/D14409.
llvm-svn: 252385
Summary:
Hi Marshall,
Could you please test this patch and see if you run into the same linker errors we talked about?
I can't reproduce on linux or OS X.
Hopefully you can't find any problems and we can fix the C++03 bot.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13337
llvm-svn: 249192
Within the shared state methods do not unlock the lock guards manually. This
could cause a race condition where the shared state is destroyed before the
method is complete.
llvm-svn: 239577
Summary:
This patch is very closely related to D4859. Please see http://reviews.llvm.org/D4859 for more information.
This patch adds support for "fancy" pointers and allocators to promise and packaged_task. The changes made to support this are exactly the same as in D4859.
Test Plan: "fancy" pointer tests were added to each constructor affected by the change.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4862
llvm-svn: 220471
If you're crazy enough to want this sort of thing, then add
-D_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_THREADS to your CXXFLAGS and
--param=additiona_features=libcpp-has-no-threads to your lit commnad line.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3969
llvm-svn: 217271
Louis Dionne