This commit enables pushing an empty #pragma clang attribute push, then adding
multiple attributes to it, then popping them all with #pragma clang attribute
pop, just like #pragma clang diagnostic. We still support the current way of
adding these, #pragma clang attribute push(__attribute__((...))), by treating it
like a combined push/attribute. This is needed to create macros like:
DO_SOMETHING_BEGIN(attr1, attr2, attr3)
// ...
DO_SOMETHING_END
rdar://45496947
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53621
llvm-svn: 345486
We need to consider all tokens that start with '>' when
we're checking for the end of an empty template argument list.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52321
llvm-svn: 342752
Summary:
We previously disallowed use of undocumented attributes with #pragma clang
attribute, but the justification for doing so was weak and it prevented many
reasonable use cases.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk, benlangmuir, dexonsmith, erik.pilkington
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51507
llvm-svn: 341437
expression
Clang emits invalid protocol metadata when a @protocol expression is used with a
forward-declared protocol. The protocol metadata is missing protocol conformance
list of the protocol since we don't have access to the definition of it in the
compiled translation unit. The linker then might end up picking the invalid
metadata when linking which will lead to incorrect runtime protocol conformance
checks.
This commit makes sure that Clang fails to compile code that uses a @protocol
expression with a forward-declared protocol. This ensures that Clang does not
emit invalid protocol metadata. I added an extra assert in CodeGen to ensure
that this kind of issue won't happen in other places.
rdar://32787811
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49462
llvm-svn: 340102
Recommit of r335084 after revert in r335516.
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse order, and therefore printed in the wrong order in
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effect, especially on
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attributes' order was changed instead.
This unfortunately causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be
textually after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes
are merged, but are incompatible to each other. Interchanging the role
of the the main and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where
two different declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple
attributes of the same declaration) are merged to be reverse. There is
no easy fix because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 338800
This adds support for the unroll_and_jam pragma, to go with the recently
added unroll and jam pass. The name of the pragma is the same as is used
in the Intel compiler, and most of the code works the same as for unroll.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam has been separated into a different
patch. This part adds #pragma unroll_and_jam with an optional count, and
#pragma no_unroll_and_jam to disable the transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47267
llvm-svn: 338566
Summary:
This patch allows the parsing of a postfix expression involving a fold expression, which is legal as a fold-expression is a primary-expression.
See also https://llvm.org/pr38282
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49848
llvm-svn: 338170
Check each case value in turn while parsing it, performing the
conversion to the switch type within the context of the expression
itself. This will become necessary in order to properly handle cleanups
for temporaries created as part of the case label (in an upcoming
patch). For now it's just good hygiene.
This necessitates moving the checking for the switch condition itself to
earlier, so that the destination type is available when checking the
case labels.
As a nice side-effect, we get slightly improved diagnostic quality and
error recovery by separating the case expression checking from the case
statement checking and from tracking whether there are discarded case
labels.
llvm-svn: 338056
While clang allows declarations in for loop init statements in c89 and
gnu89, gcc does not. So, we should probably warn if users care about gcc
compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47840
llvm-svn: 335927
... instead of prepending it at the beginning (the original behavior
since implemented in r122535 2010-12-23). This builds up an
AttributeList in the the order in which the attributes appear in the
source.
The reverse order caused nodes for attributes in the AST (e.g. LoopHint)
to be in the reverse, and therefore printed in the wrong order by
-ast-dump. Some TODO comments mention this. The order was explicitly
reversed for enable_if attribute overload resolution and name mangling,
which is not necessary anymore with this patch.
The change unfortunately has some secondary effects, especially for
diagnostic output. In the simplest cases, the CHECK lines or expected
diagnostic were changed to the the new output. If the kind of
error/warning changed, the attribute's order was changed instead.
It also causes some 'previous occurrence here' hints to be textually
after the main marker. This typically happens when attributes are
merged, but are incompatible. Interchanging the role of the the main
and note SourceLocation will also cause the case where two different
declaration's attributes (in contrast to multiple attributes of the
same declaration) are merged to be reversed. There is no easy fix
because sometimes previous attributes are merged into a new
declaration's attribute list, sometimes new attributes are added to a
previous declaration's attribute list. Since 'previous occurrence here'
pointing to locations after the main marker is not rare, I left the
markers as-is; it is only relevant when the attributes are declared in
the same declaration anyway, which often is on the same line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48100
llvm-svn: 335084
This reapplies r334224 and adds explicit triples to some tests to fix
them on Windows (where otherwise they would have run with the default
windows-msvc triple, which I'm changing the behavior for).
Original commit message:
The body of a `@finally` needs to be executed on both exceptional and
non-exceptional paths. On landingpad platforms, this is straightforward:
the `@finally` body is emitted as a normal (non-exceptional) cleanup,
and then a catch-all is emitted which branches to that cleanup (the
cleanup has code to conditionally re-throw based on a flag which is set
by the catch-all).
Unfortunately, we can't use the same approach for MSVC exceptions, where
the catch-all will be emitted as a catchpad. We can't just branch to the
cleanup from within the catchpad, since we can only exit it via a
catchret, at which point the exception is destroyed and we can't
rethrow. We could potentially emit the finally body inside the catchpad
and have the normal cleanup path somehow branch into it, but that would
require some new IR construct that could branch into a catchpad.
Instead, after discussing it with Reid Kleckner, we decided that
frontend outlining was the best approach, similar to how SEH `__finally`
works today. We decided to use CapturedStmt (which was also suggested by
Reid) rather than CaptureFinder (which is what `__finally` uses) since
the latter doesn't handle a lot of cases we care about, e.g. self
accesses, property accesses, block captures, etc. Extending
CaptureFinder to handle those additional cases proved unwieldy, whereas
CapturedStmt already took care of all of those. In theory `__finally`
could also be moved over to CapturedStmt, which would remove some
existing limitations (e.g. the inability to capture this), although
CaptureFinder would still be needed for SEH filters.
The one case supported by `@finally` but not CapturedStmt (or
CaptureFinder for that matter) is arbitrary control flow out of the
`@finally`, e.g. having a return statement inside a `@finally`. We can
add that support as a follow-up, but in practice we've found it to be
used very rarely anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47564
llvm-svn: 334251
Second attempt. Fix line endings and warning.
As an addition to CXTranslationUnit_SkipFunctionBodies, provide the
new option CXTranslationUnit_LimitSkipFunctionBodiesToPreamble,
which constraints the skipping of functions bodies to the preamble
only. Function bodies in the main file are not affected if this
option is set.
Skipping function bodies only in the preamble is what clangd already
does and the introduced flag implements it for libclang clients.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45815
llvm-svn: 332587
As an addition to CXTranslationUnit_SkipFunctionBodies, provide the
new option CXTranslationUnit_LimitSkipFunctionBodiesToPreamble,
which constraints the skipping of functions bodies to the preamble
only. Function bodies in the main file are not affected if this
option is set.
Skipping function bodies only in the preamble is what clangd already
does and the introduced flag implements it for libclang clients.
Patch by Nikolai Kosjar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45815
llvm-svn: 332578
Restrict the following keywords in the OpenCL C++ language mode,
according to Sections 2.2 & 2.9 of the OpenCL C++ 1.0 Specification.
- dynamic_cast
- typeid
- register (already restricted in OpenCL C, update the diagnostic)
- thread_local
- exceptions (try/catch/throw)
- access qualifiers read_only, write_only, read_write
Support the `__global`, `__local`, `__constant`, `__private`, and
`__generic` keywords in OpenCL C++. Leave the unprefixed address
space qualifiers such as global available, i.e., do not mark them as
reserved keywords in OpenCL C++. libclcxx provides explicit address
space pointer classes such as `global_ptr` and `global<T>` that are
implemented using the `__`-prefixed qualifiers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46022
llvm-svn: 331874
When a '>>' token is split into two '>' tokens (in C++11 onwards), or (as an
extension) when we do the same for other tokens starting with a '>', we can't
just use a location pointing to the first '>' as the location of the split
token, because that would result in our miscomputing the length and spelling
for the token. As a consequence, for example, a refactoring replacing 'A<X>'
with something else would sometimes replace one character too many, and
similarly diagnostics highlighting a template-id source range would highlight
one character too many.
Fix this by creating an expansion range covering the first character of the
'>>' token, whose spelling is '>'. For this to work, we generalize the
expansion range of a macro FileID to be either a token range (the common case)
or a character range (used in this new case).
llvm-svn: 331155
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
This patch is a tweak of changyu's patch: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40381. It differs in that the recognition of the 'concept' token is moved into the machinery that recognizes declaration-specifiers - this allows us to leverage the attribute handling machinery more seamlessly.
See the test file to get a sense of the basic parsing that this patch supports.
There is much more work to be done before concepts are usable...
Thanks Changyu!
llvm-svn: 330794
In `ParseDeclarationSpecifiers` for the code
class A typename A;
we were able to annotate token `kw_typename` because it refers to
existing type. But later during processing token `annot_typename` we
failed to `SetTypeSpecType` and exited switch statement leaving
annotation token unconsumed. The code after the switch statement failed
because it didn't expect a special token.
The fix is not to assume that switch statement consumes all special
tokens and consume any token, not just non-special.
rdar://problem/37099386
Reviewers: rsmith, arphaman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44449
llvm-svn: 329735
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
Summary:
As the title says, this makes following code compile:
```
template<typename> struct Foo {};
Foo() -> Foo<void>;
Foo f; // ok
```
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for coining the fix.
Reviewers: rsmith, lichray
Reviewed By: rsmith, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38216
llvm-svn: 328409
Summary:
The codegen for conditions assumes that a normal variable declaration is used in a condition, but this is not the case when a structured binding is used.
This fixes [PR36747](http://llvm.org/pr36747).
Thanks Nicolas Lesser for contributing the patch.
Reviewers: lichray, rsmith
Reviewed By: lichray
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44534
llvm-svn: 327780
Summary:
Let's suppose the `-Weverything` is passed.
Given code like
```
void F() {}
;
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++03`, it would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is a C++11 extension [-Wc++11-extra-semi]
;
^~
```
If the code is compiled with `-std=c++11`, it also would diagnose that extra sema:
```
<source>:2:1: warning: extra ';' outside of a function is incompatible with C++98 [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^~
```
But, let's suppose the C++11 or higher is used, and the used does not care
about `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`, so he disables that diagnostic.
And that silences the complaint about extra `;` too.
And there is no way to re-enable that particular diagnostic, passing `-Wextra-semi` does nothing...
Now, there is also a related `no newline at end of file` diagnostic, which is also emitted by `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic`
```
<source>:2:2: warning: C++98 requires newline at end of file [-Wc++98-compat-pedantic]
;
^
```
But unlike the previous case, if `-Wno-c++98-compat-pedantic` is passed, that diagnostic stays displayed:
```
<source>:2:2: warning: no newline at end of file [-Wnewline-eof]
;
^
```
This diff refactors the code so `-Wc++98-compat-extra-semi` can be re-enabled, after the `-Wc++98-compat-pedantic` was disabled.
This seems ugly, but there does not seem to be any saner way.
Testing: `$ ninja check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jordan_rose, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43162
llvm-svn: 327558
We need to treat __unaligned like the other 'cvr' qualifiers when it
appears at the end of a function prototype. We weren't doing that in
some tentative parsing.
Fixes PR36638.
llvm-svn: 326962
Specifically, we would not properly parse these types within template arguments
(for non-type template parameters), and in tentative parses. Fixing both of
these essentially requires that we parse deduced template specialization types
as types in all contexts, even in template argument lists -- in particular,
tentative parsing may look ahead and annotate a deduced template specialization
type before we figure out that we're actually supposed to treat the tokens as a
template-name. We deal with this by simply permitting deduced template
specialization types when parsing template arguments, and converting them to
template template arguments.
llvm-svn: 326299
This is not quite NFC: we don't perform the usual arithmetic conversions unless
we have an operand of arithmetic or enumeration type any more. This matches the
standard rule, but actually has no effect other than to marginally improve our
diagnostics for the non-arithmetic, non-enumeration cases (by not performing
integral promotions on one operand if the other is a pointer).
llvm-svn: 322024
Suggest moving the following erroneous attrib list (based on location)
[[]] struct X;
to
struct [[]] X;
Additionally, added a fixme for the current implementation that diagnoses misplaced attributes to consider using the newly introduced diagnostic (that I think is more user-friendly).
llvm-svn: 321449
This is a slightly odd construct (it's more common to see "A (::B)()") but can
happen in friend declarations, and the parens are not redundant as they prevent
the :: binding to the left.
llvm-svn: 321318
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
Summary:
This feature was discussed but not yet proposed. It allows a structured binding to appear as a //condition//
if (auto [ok, val] = f(...))
So the user can save an extra //condition// if the statement can test the value to-be-decomposed instead. Formally, it makes the value of the underlying object of the structured binding declaration also the value of a //condition// that is an initialized declaration.
Considering its logicality which is entirely evident from its trivial implementation, I think it might be acceptable to land it as an extension for now before I write the paper.
Reviewers: rsmith, faisalv, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39284
llvm-svn: 320011
Summary:
This is so we can implement concepts per P0734R0. Relevant failing test
cases are disabled.
Reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, rsmith, saar.raz, nwilson
Reviewed By: saar.raz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40380
Patch by Changyu Li!
llvm-svn: 319992
This also clarifies some terminology used by the diagnostic (methods -> Objective-C methods, fields -> non-static data members, etc).
Many of the tests needed to be updated in multiple places for the diagnostic wording tweaks. The first instance of the diagnostic for that attribute is fully specified and subsequent instances cut off the complete list (to make it easier if additional subjects are added in the future for the attribute).
llvm-svn: 319002
The right shift operator was not seen as a valid operator in a fold expression, which is PR32563.
Patch by Nicolas Lesser ("Blitz Rakete")!
llvm-svn: 317032
GCC ignore qualifiers on array types. Since we seem to have this
function primarily for GCC compatibility, we should try to match that
behavior.
This also adds a few more test-cases __builtin_types_compatible_p,
which were inspired by GCC's documentation on the builtin.
llvm-svn: 315951
function-style cast.
This fires for cases such as
T(x);
... where 'x' was previously declared and T is a type. This construct declares
a variable named 'x' rather than the (probably expected) interpretation of a
function-style cast of 'x' to T.
llvm-svn: 314570
This is similar to what's done on arm and x86_64, where
these calling conventions are silently ignored, as in
SVN r245076.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36105
llvm-svn: 310303
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
The goal of this commit is to fix clang-format so it does not merge tokens when
using the alternative spelling keywords. (eg: "not foo" should not become "notfoo")
The problem is that Preprocessor::HandleIdentifier used to drop the identifier info
from the token for these keyword. This means the first condition of
TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBefore is not met. We could add explicit check for
the spelling in that condition, but I think it is better to keep the IdentifierInfo
and handle the operator keyword explicitly when needed. That actually leads to simpler
code, and probably slightly more efficient as well.
Another side effect of this change is that __identifier(and) will now work as
one would expect, removing a FIXME from the MicrosoftExtensions.cpp test
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35172
llvm-svn: 308008
This change avoid a crash that occurred when skipping to EOF while parsing an
ObjC interface/implementation.
rdar://31963299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34185
llvm-svn: 305719
There's a Microsoft header in the Windows SDK which won't
compile with clang because it uses an operator name (and)
as a field name. This patch allows that file to compile by
setting the option which disables operator names.
The header which doesn't compile <Query.h> C:/Program Files (x86)/
Windows Kits/10/include/10.0.14393.0/um\Query.h:259:40:
error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
/* [case()] */ NODERESTRICTION or;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
Contributed for Melanie Blower
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D33505
llvm-svn: 303798
Summary:
The trial parse for declarative syntax accepts an invalid pack
declaration syntax, which is ambiguous with valid pack expansions of
expressions. This commit removes the invalid pack declaration syntax to
avoid mistaking valid pack expansions as invalid declarator components.
Additionally, the trial parse of a //template-argument-list// then needs
to handle the optional ellipsis that is part of that grammar, as opposed
to relying on the trial parse for declarators accepting stray ellipses.
Reviewers: rsmith, rcraik, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33339
llvm-svn: 303472
We were incorrectly setting PrevTokLocation to the first token in the
annotation token instead of the last when consuming it. To fix this without
adding a complex switch to the hot path through ConsumeToken, we now have a
ConsumeAnnotationToken function for consuming annotation tokens in addition
to the other Consume*Token special case functions.
llvm-svn: 303372
`__builtin_available`
This commit allows us to use the macOS/iOS/tvOS/watchOS platform names in
`@available`/`__builtin_available`.
rdar://32067795
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33000
llvm-svn: 302540
This switches from the prototype syntax in P0273R0 ('module' and 'module
implementation') to the consensus syntax 'export module' and 'module'.
In passing, drop the "module declaration must be first" enforcement, since EWG
seems to have changed its mind on that.
llvm-svn: 301056
This commit teaches Clang to recognize editor placeholders that are produced
when an IDE like Xcode inserts a code-completion result that includes a
placeholder. Now when the lexer sees a placeholder token, it emits an
'editor placeholder in source file' error and creates an identifier token
that represents the placeholder. The parser/sema can now recognize the
placeholders and can suppress the diagnostics related to the placeholders. This
ensures that live issues in an IDE like Xcode won't get spurious diagnostics
related to placeholders.
This commit also adds a new compiler option named '-fallow-editor-placeholders'
that silences the 'editor placeholder in source file' error. This is useful
for an IDE like Xcode as we don't want to display those errors in live issues.
rdar://31581400
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32081
llvm-svn: 300667
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
as identifiers in Objective-C++
This commit improves the 'expected identifier' errors that are presented when a
C++ keyword is used as an identifier in Objective-C++ by mentioning that this is
a C++ keyword in the diagnostic message. It also improves the error recovery:
the parser will now treat the C++ keywords as identifiers to prevent unrelated
parsing errors.
rdar://20626062
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26503
llvm-svn: 299950
Summary:
I saw the same changes in the following review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D17438
I don't know in that way I could determine that atomic variable was initialized by macro ATOMIC_VAR_INIT. Anyway I added check that atomic variables can be initialize only in global scope.
I think that we can discuss this change.
Reviewers: Anastasia, cfe-commits
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: bader, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30643
llvm-svn: 299537
This adds the new pragma and the first variant, contract(on/off/fast).
The pragma has the same block scope rules as STDC FP_CONTRACT, i.e. it can be
placed at the beginning of a compound statement or at file scope.
Similarly to STDC FP_CONTRACT there is no need to use attributes. First an
annotate token is inserted with the parsed details of the pragma. Then the
annotate token is parsed in the proper contexts and the Sema is updated with
the corresponding FPOptions using the shared ActOn function with STDC
FP_CONTRACT.
After this the FPOptions from the Sema is propagated into the AST expression
nodes. There is no change here.
I was going to add a 'default' option besides 'on/off/fast' similar to STDC
FP_CONTRACT but then decided against it. I think that we'd have to make option
uppercase then to avoid using 'default' the keyword. Also because of the
scoped activation of pragma I am not sure there is really a need a for this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31276
llvm-svn: 299470
The alias was only ever used on darwin and had some issues there,
and isn't used in practice much. Also fixes a problem with -mno-altivec
not turning off -maltivec.
Also add a diagnostic for faltivec/fno-altivec that directs users to use
maltivec options and include the altivec.h file explicitly.
llvm-svn: 298449
and the nature of a declaration
This commit adds an external_source_symbol attribute to Clang. This attribute
specifies that a declaration originates from an external source and describes
the nature of that source. This attribute will be used to improve IDE features
like 'jump-to-definition' for mixed-language projects or project that use
auto-generated code.
rdar://30423368
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29819
llvm-svn: 296649
such guides below explicit ones, and ensure that references to the class's
template parameters are not treated as forwarding references.
We make a few tweaks to the wording in the current standard:
1) The constructor parameter list is copied faithfully to the deduction guide,
without losing default arguments or a varargs ellipsis (which the standard
wording loses by omission).
2) If the class template declares no constructors, we add a T() -> T<...> guide
(which will only ever work if T has default arguments for all non-pack
template parameters).
3) If the class template declares nothing that looks like a copy or move
constructor, we add a T(T<...>) -> T<...> guide.
#2 and #3 follow from the "pretend we had a class type with these constructors"
philosophy for deduction guides.
llvm-svn: 295007
It's actually meaningful and useful to allow such variables to have no
initializer, but we are strictly following the standard here until the C++
committee reaches consensus on allowing this.
llvm-svn: 294785
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
Under this defect resolution, the injected-class-name of a class or class
template cannot be used except in very limited circumstances (when declaring a
constructor, in a nested-name-specifier, in a base-specifier, or in an
elaborated-type-specifier). This is apparently done to make parsing easier, but
it's a pain for us since we don't know whether a template-id using the
injected-class-name is valid at the point when we annotate it (we don't yet
know whether the template-id will become part of an elaborated-type-specifier).
As a tentative resolution to a perceived language defect, mem-initializer-ids
are added to the list of exceptions here (they generally follow the same rules
as base-specifiers).
When the reference to the injected-class-name uses the 'typename' or 'template'
keywords, we permit it to be used to name a type or template as an extension;
other compilers also accept some cases in this area. There are also a couple of
corner cases with dependent template names that we do not yet diagnose, but
which will also get this treatment.
llvm-svn: 292518
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
This is a re-commit of r290080 (reverted in r290092) with a fix for a
use-after-lifetime bug.
llvm-svn: 290203
This change introduces UsingPackDecl as a marker for the set of UsingDecls
produced by pack expansion of a single (unresolved) using declaration. This is
not strictly necessary (we just need to be able to map from the original using
declaration to its expansions somehow), but it's useful to maintain the
invariant that each declaration reference instantiates to refer to one
declaration.
llvm-svn: 290080
Added a map to associate types and declarations with extensions.
Refactored existing diagnostic for disabled types associated with extensions and extended it to declarations for generic situation.
Fixed some bugs for types associated with extensions.
Allow users to use pragma to declare types and functions for supported extensions, e.g.
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION the_new_extension_name : begin
// declare types and functions associated with the extension here
#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION the_new_extension_name : end
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21698
llvm-svn: 289979
Although not specifically mentioned in the documentation, MSVC accepts
__uuidof(…) and declspec(uuid("…")) attributes on enumeration types in
addition to structs/classes. This is meaningful, as such types *do* have
associated UUIDs in ActiveX typelibs, and such attributes are included
by default in the wrappers generated by their #import construct, so they
are not particularly unusual.
clang currently rejects the declspec with a –Wignored-attributes
warning, and errors on __uuidof() with “cannot call operator __uuidof on
a type with no GUID” (because it rejected the uuid attribute, and
therefore finds no value). This is causing problems for us while trying
to use clang-tidy on a codebase that makes heavy use of ActiveX.
I believe I have found the relevant places to add this functionality,
this patch adds this case to clang’s implementation of these MS
extensions. patch is against r285994 (or actually the git mirror
80464680ce).
Both include an update to test/Parser/MicrosoftExtensions.cpp to
exercise the new functionality.
This is my first time contributing to LLVM, so if I’ve missed anything
else needed to prepare this for review just let me know!
__uuidof: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zaah6a61.aspx
declspec(uuid("…")): https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3b6wkewa.aspx
#import: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8etzzkb6.aspx
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, majnemer, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26846
llvm-svn: 289567
The code pattern used to implement the token rewriting hack doesn't
interact well with token caching in the pre-processor. As a result,
clang would crash on 'int f(::(id));' while doing a tenative parse of
the contents of the outer parentheses. The original code from PR11852
still doesn't crash the compiler.
This error recovery also often does the wrong thing with member function
pointers. The test case from the original PR doesn't recover the right
way either:
void S::(*pf)() = S::f; // should be 'void (S::*pf)()'
Instead we were recovering as 'void S::*pf()', which is still wrong.
If we still think that users mistakenly parenthesize identifiers in
nested name specifiers, we should change clang to intentionally parse
that form with an error, rather than doing a token rewrite.
Fixes PR26623, but I think there will be many more bugs like this around
token rewriting in the parser.
Reviewers: rsmith, rtrieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25882
llvm-svn: 289273
This patch ensures that the typo fixit for the @try/@finally/@autoreleasepool {}
directive is shown only when we're parsing an actual statement where such
directives can actually be present.
rdar://19669565
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26916
llvm-svn: 288334
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
This assert is intended to defend against backtracking into the middle
of a sequence of tokens that is being replaced with an annotation, but
it's OK if we backtrack to the exact position of the start of the
annotation sequence. Use a <= comparison instead of <.
Fixes PR25946
llvm-svn: 284777
Summary:
Previously we had to split out a lot of our tests into a test that
checked only immediate errors and a test that checked only deferred
errors. This was because, if you emitted any immediate errors, we
wouldn't run codegen, where the deferred errors were emitted.
We've fixed this, and now emit deferred errors during sema. This lets
us merge a bunch of tests, and lets us convert some other tests to
-fsyntax-only.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25755
llvm-svn: 284553
Summary:
Emitting deferred diagnostics during codegen was a hack. It did work,
but usability was poor, both for us as compiler devs and for users. We
don't codegen if there are any sema errors, so for users this meant that
they wouldn't see deferred errors if there were any non-deferred errors.
For devs, this meant that we had to carefully split up our tests so that
when we tested deferred errors, we didn't emit any non-deferred errors.
This change moves checking for deferred errors into Sema. See the big
comment in SemaCUDA.cpp for an overview of the idea.
This checking adds overhead to compilation, because we have to maintain
a partial call graph. As a result, this change makes deferred errors a
CUDA-only concept (whereas before they were a general concept). If
anyone else wants to use this framework for something other than CUDA,
we can generalize at that time.
This patch makes the minimal set of test changes -- after this lands,
I'll go back through and do a cleanup of the tests that we no longer
have to split up.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25541
llvm-svn: 284158
Summary:
These cause us to consider all functions in-between to be __host__
__device__.
You can nest these pragmas; you just can't have more 'end's than
'begin's.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: tra, jhen, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24975
llvm-svn: 283677
Summary:
Also makes -fcoroutines_ts to be both a Driver and CC1 flag.
Patch mostly by EricWF.
Reviewers: rnk, cfe-commits, rsmith, EricWF
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25130
llvm-svn: 283064
Summary:
This is probably the sane place for the attribute to go, but nvcc
specifically rejects it. Other GNU-style attributes are allowed in this
position (although judging from the warning it emits for
host/device/global, those attributes are applied to the lambda's
anonymous struct, not to the function itself).
It would be nice to have a FixIt message here, but doing so, or even
just getting the correct range for the attribute, including its '((' and
'))'s, is apparently Hard.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25115
llvm-svn: 282911
Summary: This is ugh, but it makes us compatible with NVCC. Fixes bug 26341.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, tra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25103
llvm-svn: 282879
- Should diag on a function (clang-cl warns; it's an error in cl)
- Test the attribute on nested classes (clang-cl is more permissive and more
self-consistent than cl here)
llvm-svn: 280845
Some Windows SDK classes, for example
Windows::Storage::Streams::IBufferByteAccess, use the ATL way of spelling
attributes:
[uuid("....")] class IBufferByteAccess {};
To be able to use __uuidof() to grab the uuid off these types, clang needs to
support uuid as a Microsoft attribute. There was already code to skip Microsoft
attributes, extend that to look for uuid and parse it. Use the new "Microsoft"
attribute type added in r280575 (and r280574, r280576) for this.
Final part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280578
Clang tests for verifying the following syntaxes:
1. 0xNN and NNh are accepted as valid hexadecimal numbers, but 0xNNh is not.
0xNN and NNh may come with optional U or L suffix.
2. NNb is accepted as a valid binary (base-2) number, but 0bNN is not.
NNb may come with optional U or L suffix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22112
llvm-svn: 280556
from p0273r0 approved by EWG). We'll eventually need to handle this from the
lexer as well, in order to disallow preprocessor directives preceding the
module declaration and to support macro import.
llvm-svn: 279196
This commit adds a traversal of the AST after Sema of a function that diagnoses
unguarded references to declarations that are partially available (based on
availability attributes). This traversal is only done when we would otherwise
emit -Wpartial-availability.
This commit is part of a feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23003
llvm-svn: 278826
As reported in bug 28473, GCC supports "final" functionality in pre-C++11 code using the __final keyword. Clang currently supports the "final" keyword in accordance with the C++11 specification, however it ALSO supports it in pre-C++11 mode, with a warning.
This patch adds the "__final" keyword for compatibility with GCC in GCC Keywords mode (so it is enabled with existing flags), and issues a warning on its usage (suggesting switching to the C++11 keyword). This patch also adds a regression test for the functionality described. I believe this patch has minimal impact, as it simply adds a new keyword for existing behavior.
This has been validated with check-clang to avoid regressions. Patch is created in reference to revisions 276665.
Patch by Erich Keane.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22919
llvm-svn: 277134
decomposition declarations.
There are a couple of things in the wording that seem strange here:
decomposition declarations are permitted at namespace scope (which we partially
support here) and they are permitted as the declaration in a template (which we
reject).
llvm-svn: 276492
This patch adds a new AST node: ObjCAvailabilityCheckExpr, and teaches the
Parser and Sema to generate it. This node represents an availability check of
the form:
@available(macos 10.10, *);
Which will eventually compile to a runtime check of the host's OS version. This
is the first patch of the feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22171
llvm-svn: 275654
function-style cast to a non-dependent type which is then used in an invalid
way. We'd lose the "type dependent" bit here, and downstream Sema processing
would then discard the expression if it was used in a context where its type
rendered it invalid.
llvm-svn: 274267
Erik Pilkington