These are handled almost identically to static mode (and ELF's global address
materialisation), except that a symbol may have "$non_lazy_ptr" appended. This
can be handled by passing appropriate flags along with the instruction instead
of using entirely separate pseudo-instructions.
llvm-svn: 195655
There is no sane way for an LEApcrel (= single ADR) instruction to generate a
global address on any ARM target I know of. Fortunately, no-one was trying to
any more, but there were vestigial patterns.
llvm-svn: 195644
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
Stop folding constant adds into GEP when the type size doesn't match.
Otherwise, the adds' operands are effectively being promoted, changing the
conditions of an overflow. Results are different when:
sext(a) + sext(b) != sext(a + b)
Problem originally found on x86-64, but also fixed issues with ARM and PPC,
which used similar code.
<rdar://problem/15292280>
Patch by Duncan Exon Smith!
llvm-svn: 194840
By default, the behavior of IT block generation will be determinated
dynamically base on the arch (armv8 vs armv7). This patch adds backend
options: -arm-restrict-it and -arm-no-restrict-it. The former one
restricts the generation of IT blocks (the same behavior as thumbv8) for
both arches. The later one allows the generation of legacy IT block (the
same behavior as ARMv7 Thumb2) for both arches.
Clang will support -mrestrict-it and -mno-restrict-it, which is
compatible with GCC.
llvm-svn: 194592
The system LDM and STM instructions can't usually writeback to the base
register. The one exception is when an LDM is actually an exception-return
(i.e. contains PC in the register list).
(There's already a test that "ldm sp!, {r0-r3, pc}^" works, which is why there
is no positive test).
rdar://problem/15223374
llvm-svn: 194512
This commit cleans up some comments in ARMBuildAttrs.h.
Besides, this commit fixes an error related to AllowWMMXv1
and AllowWMMXv2 (although they are not used currently.)
llvm-svn: 194327
ARM prologues usually look like:
push {r7, lr}
sub sp, sp, #4
If code size is extremely important, this can be optimised to the single
instruction:
push {r6, r7, lr}
where we don't actually care about the contents of r6, but pushing it subtracts
4 from sp as a side effect.
This should implement such a conversion, predicated on the "minsize" function
attribute (-Oz) since I've yet to find any code it actually makes faster.
llvm-svn: 194264
Cortex-M0 supports these 32-bit instructions despite being Thumb1 only
(mostly). We knew about that but not that the aliases without the default "sy"
operand were also permitted.
llvm-svn: 194094
ResolveFrameIndex had what appeared to be a very nasty hack for when the
frame-index referred to a callee-saved register. In this case it "adjusted" the
offset so that the address was correct if (and only if) the MachineInstr
immediately followed the respective push.
This "worked" for all forms of GPR & DPR but was only ever used to set the
frame pointer itself, and once this was put in a more sensible location the
entire state-tracking machinery it relied on became redundant. So I stripped
it.
The only wrinkle is that "add r7, sp, #0" might theoretically be slower (need
an actual ALU slot) compared to "mov r7, sp" so I added a micro-optimisation
that also makes emitARMRegUpdate and emitT2RegUpdate also work when NumBytes ==
0.
No test changes since there shouldn't be any functionality change.
llvm-svn: 194025
Add a Virtualization ARM subtarget feature along with adding proper build
attribute emission for Tag_Virtualization_use (encodes Virtualization and
TrustZone) and Tag_MPextension_use.
Also rework test/CodeGen/ARM/2010-10-19-mc-elf-objheader.ll testcase to
something that is more maintainable. This changes the focus of this
testcase away from testing CPU defaults (which is tested elsewhere), onto
specifically testing that attributes are encoded correctly.
llvm-svn: 193859
Fix Tag_ABI_HardFP_use build attribute to handle single precision FP,
replace deprecated Tag_ABI_HardFP_use value of 3 with 0 and also add
some tests for Tag_ABI_VFP_args.
llvm-svn: 193856
When an extend more than doubles the size of the elements (e.g., a zext
from v16i8 to v16i32), the normal legalization method of splitting the
vectors will run into problems as by the time the destination vector is
legal, the source vector is illegal. The end result is the operation
often becoming scalarized, with the typical horrible performance. For
example, on x86_64, the simple input of:
define void @bar(<16 x i8> %a, <16 x i32>* %p) nounwind {
%tmp = zext <16 x i8> %a to <16 x i32>
store <16 x i32> %tmp, <16 x i32>*%p
ret void
}
Generates:
.section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
.section __TEXT,__const
.align 5
LCPI0_0:
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.long 255 ## 0xff
.section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
.globl _bar
.align 4, 0x90
_bar:
vpunpckhbw %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
vpunpckhwd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm2
vpmovzxwd %xmm1, %xmm1
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
vmovaps LCPI0_0(%rip), %ymm2
vandps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
vpmovzxbw %xmm0, %xmm3
vpunpckhwd %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm3
vpmovzxbd %xmm0, %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm3, %ymm0, %ymm0
vandps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
vmovaps %ymm0, (%rdi)
vmovaps %ymm1, 32(%rdi)
vzeroupper
ret
So instead we can check if there are legal types that enable us to split
more cleverly when the input vector is already legal such that we don't
turn it into an illegal type. If the extend is such that it's more than
doubling the size of the input we check if
- the number of vector elements is even,
- the source type is legal,
- the type of a split source is illegal,
- the type of an extended (by doubling element size) source is legal, and
- the type of that extended source when split is legal.
If the conditions are met, instead of just splitting both the
destination and the source types, we create an extend that only goes up
one "step" (doubling the element width), and the continue legalizing the
rest of the operation normally. The result is that this operates as a
new, more effecient, termination condition for the loop of "split the
operation until the destination type is legal."
With this change, the above example now compiles to:
_bar:
vpxor %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
vpunpcklbw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2
vpunpckhwd %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm3
vpunpcklwd %xmm1, %xmm2, %xmm2
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
vpunpckhbw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
vpunpckhwd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm3
vpunpcklwd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
vinsertf128 $1, %xmm3, %ymm0, %ymm0
vmovaps %ymm0, 32(%rdi)
vmovaps %ymm2, (%rdi)
vzeroupper
ret
This generalizes a custom lowering that was added a while back to the
ARM backend. That lowering is no longer necessary, and is removed. The
testcases for it, however, provide excellent ARM tests for this change
and so remain.
rdar://14735100
llvm-svn: 193727
Helper functions are added:
emitPostLd: emit a post-increment load operation with given size.
emitPostSt: emit a post-increment store operation with given size.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 193656
Adds a subtarget feature for the CRC instructions (optional in v8-A) to the ARM (32-bit) backend.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2036
llvm-svn: 193599
By vectorizing a series of srl, or, ... instructions we have obfuscated the
intention so much that the backend does not know how to fold this code away.
radar://15336950
llvm-svn: 193573
an MCExpr, in order to avoid writing an encoded zero value in the immediate
field.
When getUnconditionalBranchTargetOpValue is called with an MCExpr target, we
don't know what the final immediate field value should be. We shouldn't
explicitly set the immediate field to an encoded zero value as zero is encoded
with a non-zero bit pattern. This leads to bits being set that pollute the
final immediate value. The nature of the encoding is such that the polluted
bits only affect very large immediate values, explaining why this hasn't
caused problems earlier.
Fixes <rdar://problem/15155975>.
llvm-svn: 193535
This commit allows the ARM integrated assembler to parse
and assemble the code with .eabi_attribute, .cpu, and
.fpu directives.
To implement the feature, this commit moves the code from
AttrEmitter to ARMTargetStreamers, and several new test
cases related to cortex-m4, cortex-r5, and cortex-a15 are
added.
Besides, this commit also change the Subtarget->isFPOnlySP()
to Subtarget->hasD16() to match the usage of .fpu directive.
This commit changes the test cases:
* Several .eabi_attribute directives in
2010-09-29-mc-asm-header-test.ll are removed because the .fpu
directive already cover the functionality.
* In the Cortex-A15 test case, the value for
Tag_Advanced_SIMD_arch has be changed from 1 to 2,
which is more precise.
llvm-svn: 193524
When assembling, a .thumb_func directive is supposed to be applicable to the
next symbol definition, even if there are intervening directives. We were
racing ahead to try and find it, and this commit should fix the issue.
Patch by Gabor Ballabas
llvm-svn: 193403
There's a barrier instruction so that should still be used, but most actual
atomic operations are going to need a platform decision on the correct
behaviour (either nop if single-threaded or OS-support otherwise).
rdar://problem/15287210
llvm-svn: 193399
This commit changes the struct byval lowering for arm to use inline
checks for the subtarget instead of a class abstraction to represent
the differences. The class abstraction was judged to be too much
code for this task.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 193357
This prevents us from silently accepting invalid instructions on (for example)
Cortex-M4 with just single-precision VFP support.
No tests for the extra Pat Requires because they're essentially assertions: the
affected code should have been lowered to libcalls before ISel.
rdar://problem/15302004
llvm-svn: 193354
The fused multiply instructions were added in VFPv4 but are still NEON
instructions, in particular they shouldn't be available on a Cortex-M4 not
matter how floaty it is.
llvm-svn: 193342
If an alias inherits directly from InstAlias then it doesn't get any default
"Requires" values, so llvm-mc will allow it even on architectures that don't
support the underlying instruction.
This tidies up the obvious VFP and NEON cases I found.
llvm-svn: 193340
The compiler-rt functions __adddf3vfp and so on exist purely to allow Thumb1
code to make use of VFP instructions by switching back to ARM mode, they make
no sense for M-class processors which don't even have an ARM mode.
Given that justification, in practice this is a platform ABI decision so the
actual check is based on that rather than CPU features.
rdar://problem/15302004
llvm-svn: 193327
POP instructions are aliased to the ARM LDM variants but have different syntax.
This caused two problems: we tried to access a non-existent operand to annotate
the '!', and the error message didn't make much sense.
With some vigorous hand-waving in the error message both problems can be
fixed.
llvm-svn: 193322
The set of circumstances where the writeback register is allowed to be in the
list of registers is rather baroque, but I think this implements them all on
the assembly parsing side.
For disassembly, we still warn about an ARM-mode LDM even if the architecture
revision is < v7 (the required architecture information isn't available). It's
a silly instruction anyway, so hopefully no-one will mind.
rdar://problem/15223374
llvm-svn: 193185
Tim Northover