Always depend on the compiler to have a correct implementation of
max_align_t in stddef.h and don't provide a fallback. For pre-C++11,
require __STDCPP_NEW_ALIGNMENT__ in <new> as provided by clang in all
standard modes. Adjust test cases to avoid testing or using max_align_t
in pre-C++11 mode and also to better deal with alignof(max_align_t)>16.
Document requirements of the alignment tests around natural alignment of
power-of-two-sized types.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73245
Depend on the compiler to provide a correct implementation of
max_align_t. If __STDCPP_NEW_ALIGNMENT__ is missing and C++03 mode has
been explicitly enabled, provide a minimal fallback in <new> as
alignment of the largest primitive types.
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
The NetBSD headers ship with max_align_t, that is not
compatible with the fallback version in libc++.
There is no defined a compiler specific symbol in the headers like:
- __CLANG_MAX_ALIGN_T_DEFINED
- _GCC_MAX_ALIGN_T
- __DEFINED_max_align_t
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: chandlerc, dlj, EricWF, joerg
Reviewed By: joerg
Subscribers: bsdjhb, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47814
llvm-svn: 340224
Summary:
Libcxx will define its own max_align_t when it is not available. However, the
availability checks today only check for Clang's definition and GCC's
definition. In particular, it does not check for musl's definition, which is the
same as GCC's but guarded with a different macro.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: chandlerc, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28478
llvm-svn: 294683
There are a bunch of macros (__need_size_t etc) that request just one piece of
<stddef.h>; if any one of these is defined, we just directly include the
underlying header.
Note that <stddef.h> provides a ::nullptr_t. We don't want that available to
includers of <cstddef>, so instead of following the usual pattern where <cfoo>
includes <foo.h> then pulls things from :: into std:: with using-declarations,
we implement <stddef.h> and <cstddef> separately; both include <__nullptr> for
the definition of std::nullptr_t.
llvm-svn: 249761
Louis Dionne