This patch is a different approach to landing the reverted r349701.
It is expected to have the same object (memory region) treated as if it has
different types in different program points. The correct behavior for
RegionStore when an object is stored as an object of type T1 but loaded as
an object of type T2 is to store the object as if it has type T1 but cast it
to T2 during load.
Note that the cast here is some sort of a "reinterpret_cast" (even in C). For
instance, if you store an integer and load a float, you won't get your integer
represented as a float; instead, you will get garbage.
Admit that we cannot perform the cast and return an unknown value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55875
rdar://problem/45062567
llvm-svn: 349984
It is important to specify the version of the standard because tests should
test the same thing regardless of the current default version of the standard.
llvm-svn: 343736
Commit r340984 causes a crash when a pointer to a completely unrelated type
UnrelatedT (eg., opaque struct pattern) is being casted from base class BaseT to
derived class DerivedT, which results in an ill-formed region
Derived{SymRegion{$<UnrelatedT x>}, DerivedT}.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52189
llvm-svn: 343051
Introduce a new MemRegion sub-class, CXXDerivedObjectRegion, which is
the opposite of CXXBaseObjectRegion, to represent such casts. Such region is
a bit weird because it is by design bigger than its super-region.
But it's not harmful when it is put on top of a SymbolicRegion
that has unknown extent anyway.
Offset computation for CXXDerivedObjectRegion and proper modeling of casts
still remains to be implemented.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51191
llvm-svn: 340984
The canonical representation of pointer &SymRegion{$x} casted to boolean is
"$x != 0", not "$x". Assertion added in r337227 catches that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48232
llvm-svn: 337228
Many glvalue expressions aren't of their respective reference type -
they are simply glvalues of their value type.
This was causing problems when we were trying to obtain type of the original
expression while evaluating certain glvalue bit-casts.
Fixed by artificially forging a reference type to provide to the casting
procedure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46224
llvm-svn: 331558
We have assertions for this, but a few edge cases had snuck through where
we were still unconditionally using 'int'.
<rdar://problem/15703011>
llvm-svn: 197733
We now have symbols with floating-point type to make sure that
(double)x == (double)x comes out true, but we still can't do much with
these. For now, don't even bother trying to create a floating-point zero
value; just give up on conversion to bool.
PR14634, C++ edition.
llvm-svn: 190953
This does not actually give us the right behavior for reinterpret_cast
of references. Reverting so I can think about it some more.
This reverts commit 50a75a6e26a49011150067adac556ef978639fe6.
llvm-svn: 158341
These casts only appear in very well-defined circumstances, in which the
target of a reinterpret_cast or a function formal parameter is an lvalue
reference. According to the C++ standard, the following are equivalent:
reinterpret_cast<T&>( x)
*reinterpret_cast<T*>(&x)
[expr.reinterpret.cast]p11
llvm-svn: 158338
Artem Dergachev