Replace forms of `assertTrue(err.Success())` with `assertSuccess(err)` (added in D82759).
* `assertSuccess` prints out the error's message
* `assertSuccess` expresses explicit higher level semantics, both to the reader and for test failure output
* `assertSuccess` seems not to be well known, using it where possible will help spread knowledge
* `assertSuccess` statements are more succinct
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119616
We had two sets of build<flavour> methods, whose bodies were largely
identical. This makes any kind of modification in their vicinity
repetitive and error-prone.
Replace each set with a single method taking an optional debug_info
parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111989
Adding the to be loaded dylib to the extra images causes the breakpoint
to be found in the image added to the target on Linux (though not on
Darwin). So adjust the test for this difference.
I added some tests for the case where the breakpoints take immediately
to the extant test case, and made a new test case for when the source
regex breakpoint will be set in a dlopen-ed library.
I also noticed when doing this that "lldbutil.run_to_source_breakpoint
can't handle the case where the breakpoint will be in a dlopen-ed
library, since it requires the breakpoint to have at least 1 location
before run. I fixed that by adding a parameter to say whether a
before run location is expected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111920
Following LLDB tests fail randomly on LLDB Arm/AArch64 Linux buildbots.
We still not have a reliable solution for these tests to pass
consistently. I am marking them skipped for now.
TestBreakpointCallbackCommandSource.py
TestIOHandlerResize.py
TestEditline.py
TestGuiViewLarge.py
TestGuiExpandThreadsTree.py
TestGuiBreakpoints.py
https://reviews.llvm.org/D45592 added a nice feature to be able to specify a breakpoint by a relative path. E.g. passing foo.cpp or bar/foo.cpp or zaz/bar/foo.cpp is fine. However, https://reviews.llvm.org/D68671 by mistake disabled the test that ensured this functionality works. With time, someone made a small mistake and fully broke the functionality.
So, I'm making a very simple fix and the test passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107126
The code that figured out which breakpoints to delete was supposed
to set the result status if it found breakpoints, and then the code
that actually deleted them checked that the result's status was set.
The code for "break delete --disabled" failed to set the status if
no "protected" breakpoints were provided. This was a confusing way
to implement this, so I reworked it with early returns so it was less
error prone, and added a test case for the no arguments case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106623
Previously ignore counts were checked when we stopped to do the sync callback in Breakpoint::ShouldStop. That meant we would do all the ignore count work even when
there is also a condition says the breakpoint should not stop.
That's wrong, lldb treats breakpoint hits that fail the thread or condition checks as "not having hit the breakpoint". So the ignore count check should happen after
the condition and thread checks in StopInfoBreakpoint::PerformAction.
The one side-effect of doing this is that if you have a breakpoint with a synchronous callback, it will run the synchronous callback before checking the ignore count.
That is probably a good thing, since this was already true of the condition and thread checks, so this removes an odd asymmetry. And breakpoints with sync callbacks
are all internal lldb breakpoints and there's not a really good reason why you would want one of these to use an ignore count (but not a condition or thread check...)
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D103217
At the moment nearly every test calls something similar to
`self.dbg.CreateTarget(self.getBuildArtifact("a.out"))` and them sometimes
checks if the created target is actually valid with something like
`self.assertTrue(target.IsValid(), "some useless text")`.
Beside being really verbose the error messages generated by this pattern are
always just indicating that the target failed to be created but now why.
This patch introduces a helper function `createTestTarget` to our Test class
that creates the target with the much more verbose `CreateTarget` overload that
gives us back an SBError (with a fancy error). If the target couldn't be created
the function prints out the SBError that LLDB returned and asserts for us. It
also defaults to the "a.out" build artifact path that nearly all tests are using
to avoid to hardcode "a.out" in every test.
I converted a bunch of tests to the new function but I'll do the rest of the
test suite as follow ups.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102771
This patch fixes the column symbol resolution when creating a breakpoint
with the `move_to_nearest_code` flag set.
In order to achieve this, the patch adds column information handling in
the `LineTable`'s `LineEntry` finder. After experimenting a little, it
turns out the most natural approach in case of an inaccurate column match,
is to move backward and match the previous `LineEntry` rather than going
forward like we do with simple line breakpoints.
The patch also reflows the function to reduce code duplication.
Finally, it updates the `BreakpointResolver` heuristic to align it with
the `LineTable` method.
rdar://73218201
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101221
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Convert `assertTrue(a == b)` to `assertEqual(a, b)` to produce better failure messages.
These were mostly done via regex search & replace, with some manual fixes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95813
Explicitly consider the libraries reported on the initial rendezvous
breakpoint hit added. This is necessary on FreeBSD since the dynamic
loader issues only a single 'consistent' state rendezvous breakpoint hit
for all the libraries present in DT_NEEDED. It is also helpful on Linux
where it ensures that ld-linux is considered loaded as well
as the shared system libraries reported afterwards.
Reenable memory maps on FreeBSD since this fixed the issue triggered
by them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92187
This patch exposes the Target::CreateBreakpoint overload with the
boolean argument to move to the neareast code to the SBAPI.
This is useful when creating column breakpoints to restrict lldb's
resolution to the pointed source location, preventing it to go to the next
line.
rdar://72196842
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93266
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch exposes the Target::CreateBreakpoint overload with the
boolean argument to move to the neareast code to the SBAPI.
This is useful when creating column breakpoints to restrict lldb's
resolution to the pointed source location, preventing it to go to the next
line.
rdar://72196842
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93266
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Explicitly consider the libraries reported on the initial eTakeSnapshot
action added, through adding them to the added soentry list
in DYLDRendezvous::SaveSOEntriesFromRemote(). This is necessary
on FreeBSD since the dynamic loader issues only a single 'consistent'
state rendezvous breakpoint hit for all the libraries present
in DT_NEEDED (while Linux issues an added-consistent event pair).
Reenable memory maps on FreeBSD since this fixed the issue triggered
by them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92187
Replace the plethora of ObjC-implied 'skipUnlessDarwin' decorators
with marking tests as 'objc' category (whenever missing), and skip all
ObjC tests on non-Darwin platforms. I have used '.categories' file
wherever it was present already or all (>1) tests were relying on ObjC,
and explicit add_test_categories() where there was only one test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91056
Add preconditions to `TestBase.expect()` that catch semantically invalid calls
that happen to succeed anyway. This also fixes the broken callsites caught by
these checks.
This prevents the following incorrect calls:
1. `self.expect("lldb command", "some substr")`
2. `self.expect("lldb command", "assert message", "some substr")`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88792
This patch adds a way to fetch breakpoint metadatas as a serialized
`Structured` Data format (JSON). This can be used by IDEs to update
their UI when a breakpoint is set or modified from the console.
rdar://11013798
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87491
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Rename the existing expectedFailure to expectedFailureIfFn to better
describe its purpose and provide an overload for
unittest2.expectedFailure in decorators.py.
Most process plugins (if not all) don't set hardware index for breakpoints. They even
are not able to determine this index.
This patch makes StoppointLocation::IsHardware pure virtual and lets BreakpointSite
override it using more accurate BreakpointSite::Type.
It also adds assertions to be sure that a breakpoint site is hardware when this is required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84257
file:line:column form that we use to print out locations. Since we
print them this way it makes sense we also accept that form.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83975
This patch improves the error reporting for SBBreakpoint::AddName by
adding a new method `SBBreakpoint::AddNameWithErrorHandling` that returns
a SBError instead of a boolean.
This way, if the breakpoint naming failed in the backend, the client
(i.e. Xcode), will be able to report the reason of that failure to the
user.
rdar://64765461
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82879
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch improves the error reporting for SBBreakpoint::AddName by
adding a new method `SBBreakpoint::AddNameWithErrorHandling` that returns
a SBError instead of a boolean.
This way, if the breakpoint naming failed in the backend, the client
(i.e. Xcode), will be able to report the reason of that failure to the
user.
rdar://64765461
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Many tests use (commented out) print statement for debugging the test
itself. This patch adds a new trace method to lldbtest to reuse the
existing tracing infrastructure and replace these print statements.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80448
Skip tests or parts thereof that aren't expected to work when run from a
reproducer. Also improve the doc comments in configuration.py to prevent
mistakes in the future.
Jim Ingham