This removes a bit of context from the verifier erros, but reduces code
duplication in a fairly critical part of LLVM and makes dominates easier to test.
llvm-svn: 157845
IntItem cleanup. IntItemBase, IntItemConstantIntImp and IntItem merged into IntItem. All arithmetic operators was propogated from APInt. Also added comparison operators <,>,<=,>=. Currently you will find set of macros that propogates operators from APInt to IntItem in the beginning of IntegerSubset. Note that THESE MACROS WILL REMOVED after all passes will case-ranges compatible. Also note that these macros much smaller pain that something like this:
if (V->getValue().ugt(AnotherV->getValue()) { ... }
These changes made IntItem full featured integer object. It allows to make IntegerSubset class generic (move out all ConstantInt references inside and add unit-tests) in next commits.
llvm-svn: 157810
be non contiguous, non overlapping and sorted by the lower end.
While this is technically a backward incompatibility, every frontent currently
produces range metadata with a single interval and we don't have any pass
that merges intervals yet, so no existing bitcode files should be rejected by
this.
llvm-svn: 157741
Implemented IntItem - the wrapper around APInt. Why not to use APInt item directly right now?
1. It will very difficult to implement case ranges as series of small patches. We got several large and heavy patches. Each patch will about 90-120 kb. If you replace ConstantInt with APInt in SwitchInst you will need to changes at the same time all Readers,Writers and absolutely all passes that uses SwitchInst.
2. We can implement APInt pool inside and save memory space. E.g. we use several switches that works with 256 bit items (switch on signatures, or strings). We can avoid value duplicates in this case.
3. IntItem can be easyly easily replaced with APInt.
4. Currenly we can interpret IntItem both as ConstantInt and as APInt. It allows to provide SwitchInst methods that works with ConstantInt for non-updated passes.
Why I need it right now? Currently I need to update SimplifyCFG pass (EqualityComparisons). I need to work with APInts directly a lot, so peaces of code
ConstantInt *V = ...;
if (V->getValue().ugt(AnotherV->getValue()) {
...
}
will look awful. Much more better this way:
IntItem V = ConstantIntVal->getValue();
if (AnotherV < V) {
}
Of course any reviews are welcome.
P.S.: I'm also going to rename ConstantRangesSet to IntegersSubset, and CRSBuilder to IntegersSubsetMapping (allows to map individual subsets of integers to the BasicBlocks).
Since in future these classes will founded on APInt, it will possible to use them in more generic ways.
llvm-svn: 157576
making it stronger and more sane.
Delete the code from tblgen that produced the old code.
Besides being a path forward in intrinsic sanity, this also eliminates a bunch of
machine generated code that was compiled into Function.o
llvm-svn: 157545
separate side table, using the handy SequenceToOffsetTable class. This encodes all
these weird things into another 256 bytes, allowing all intrinsics to be encoded this way.
llvm-svn: 156995
generated code (for Intrinsic::getType) into a table. This handles common cases right now,
but I plan to extend it to handle all cases and merge in type verification logic as well
in follow-on patches.
llvm-svn: 156905
Ordinary patch for PR1255.
Added new case-ranges orientated methods for adding/removing cases in SwitchInst. After this patch cases will internally representated as ConstantArray-s instead of ConstantInt, externally cases wrapped within the ConstantRangesSet object.
Old methods of SwitchInst are also works well, but marked as deprecated. So on this stage we have no side effects except that I added support for case ranges in BitcodeReader/Writer, of course test for Bitcode is also added. Old "switch" format is also supported.
llvm-svn: 156704
Instruction::IsIdenticalToWhenDefined.
This manifested itself when inlining two calls to the same function. The
inlined function had a switch statement that returned one of a set of
global variables. Without this modification, the two phi instructions that
chose values from the branches of the switch instruction inlined from the
callee were considered equivalent and jump-threading replaced a load for the
first switch value with a phi selecting from the second switch, thereby
producing incorrect code.
This patch has been tested with "make check-all", "lnt runteste nt", and
llvm self-hosted, and on the original program that had this problem,
wireshark.
<rdar://problem/11025519>
llvm-svn: 156548
This lets you save the textual representation of the LLVM IR to a file.
Before this patch it could only be printed to STDERR from llvm-c.
Patch by Carlo Kok!
llvm-svn: 156479
Added new case-ranges orientated methods for adding/removing cases in SwitchInst. After this patch cases will internally representated as ConstantArray-s instead of ConstantInt, externally cases wrapped within the ConstantRangesSet object.
Old methods of SwitchInst are also works well, but marked as deprecated. So on this stage we have no side effects except that I added support for case ranges in BitcodeReader/Writer, of course test for Bitcode is also added. Old "switch" format is also supported.
llvm-svn: 156374
instead of getAggregateElement. This has the advantage of being
more consistent and allowing higher-level constant folding to
procede even if an inner extract element cannot be folded.
Make ConstantFoldInstruction call ConstantFoldConstantExpression
on the instruction's operands, making it more consistent with
ConstantFoldConstantExpression itself. This makes sure that
ConstantExprs get TargetData-aware folding before being handed
off as operands for further folding.
This causes more expressions to be folded, but due to a known
shortcoming in constant folding, this currently has the side effect
of stripping a few more nuw and inbounds flags in the non-targetdata
side of constant-fold-gep.ll. This is mostly harmless.
This fixes rdar://11324230.
llvm-svn: 155682
through the use of 'fpmath' metadata. Currently this only provides a 'fpaccuracy'
value, which may be a number in ULPs or the keyword 'fast', however the intent is
that this will be extended with additional information about NaN's, infinities
etc later. No optimizations have been hooked up to this so far.
llvm-svn: 154822
thinking of generalizing it to be able to specify other freedoms beyond accuracy
(such as that NaN's don't have to be respected). I'd like the 3.1 release (the
first one with this metadata) to have the more generic name already rather than
having to auto-upgrade it in 3.2.
llvm-svn: 154744
directly instead of a user Instruction. This allows them to test
whether a def dominates a particular operand if the user instruction
is a PHI.
llvm-svn: 154631
Rafael Espindola