Summary:
This adds the same checks that were added in r264593 to all
target-specific passes that run after register allocation.
Reviewers: qcolombet
Subscribers: jyknight, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18525
llvm-svn: 265313
This patch adds some missing calls to MBB::normalizeSuccProbs() in several
locations where it should be called. Those places are found by checking if the
sum of successors' probabilities is approximate one in MachineBlockPlacement
pass with some instrumented code (not in this patch).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15259
llvm-svn: 255455
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
calls that don't take a Function argument from Mips. Notable
exceptions: the AsmPrinter and MipsTargetObjectFile. The
latter needs to be fixed, and the former will be fixed when the
general AsmPrinter changes happen.
llvm-svn: 227512
than on MipsSubtargetInfo.
This required a bit of massaging in the MC level to handle this since
MC is a) largely a collection of disparate classes with no hierarchy,
and b) there's no overarching equivalent to the TargetMachine, instead
only the subtarget via MCSubtargetInfo (which is the base class of
TargetSubtargetInfo).
We're now storing the ABI in both the TargetMachine level and in the
MC level because the AsmParser and the TargetStreamer both need to
know what ABI we have to parse assembly and emit objects. The target
streamer has a pointer to the one in the asm parser and is updated
when the asm parser is created. This is fragile as the FIXME comment
notes, but shouldn't be a problem in practice since we always
create an asm parser before attempting to emit object code via the
assembler. The TargetMachine now contains the ABI so that the DataLayout
can be constructed dependent upon ABI.
All testcases have been updated to use the -target-abi command line
flag so that we can set the ABI without using a subtarget feature.
Should be no change visible externally here.
llvm-svn: 227102
filler such as if delay slot filler have to put NOP instruction into the
delay slot of microMIPS BEQ or BNE instruction which uses the register $0,
then instead of emitting NOP this instruction is replaced by the corresponding
microMIPS compact branch instruction, i.e. BEQZC or BNEZC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3566
llvm-svn: 222580
Summary:
No functional change yet, it's just an object replacement for an enum.
It will allow us to gather ABI information in a single place so that we can
start testing for properties of the ABI's instead of the ABI itself.
For example we will eventually be able to use:
ABI.MinStackAlignmentInBytes()
instead of:
(isABI_N32() || isABI_N64()) ? 16 : 8
which is clearer and more maintainable.
Reviewers: matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3341
llvm-svn: 220568
be deleted. This will be reapplied as soon as possible and before
the 3.6 branch date at any rate.
Approved by Jim Grosbach, Lang Hames, Rafael Espindola.
This reverts commits r215111, 215115, 215116, 215117, 215136.
llvm-svn: 215154
I am sure we will be finding bits and pieces of dead code for years to
come, but this is a good start.
Thanks to Lang Hames for making MCJIT a good replacement!
llvm-svn: 215111
Summary:
b(ge|lt)zal have been removed in MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6. However, bal (an alias
for 'bgezal $zero, $offset') still remains with the same encoding it had
prior to MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6.
Updated the MipsNaCLELFStreamer, and MipsLongBranch to correctly handle the
MIPS32r6/MIPS64r6 BAL instruction in addition to the existing BAL_BR pseudo.
No changes were required to the CodeGen test that looks for BAL
(test/CodeGen/Mips/longbranch.ll) since the new instruction has the same
syntax.
Depends on D4113
Reviewers: jkolek, zoran.jovanovic, vmedic
Reviewed By: vmedic
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4114
llvm-svn: 210898
* Move the instruction that changes sp outside of the branch delay slot.
* Bundle-align the target of indirect branch.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3928
llvm-svn: 210262
%higher and %highest can have non-zero values only for offsets greater
than 2GB, which is highly unlikely, if not impossible when compiling a
single function. This makes long branch for MIPS64 3 instructions smaller.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3281.diff
llvm-svn: 209678
target cannot be determined accurately. This is the case for NaCl where the
sandboxing instructions are added in MC layer, after the MipsLongBranch pass.
It is also the case when the code has inline assembly. Instead of calculating
offset in the MipsLongBranch pass, use %hi(sym1 - sym2) and %lo(sym1 - sym2)
expressions that are resolved during the fixup.
This patch also deletes microMIPS test file test/CodeGen/Mips/micromips-long-branch.ll
and implements microMIPS CHECKs in a much simpler way in a file
test/CodeGen/Mips/longbranch.ll, together with MIPS32 and MIPS64.
llvm-svn: 207656
and mips16 on a per function basis.
Because this patch is somewhat involved I have provide an overview of the
key pieces of it.
The patch is written so as to not change the behavior of the non mixed
mode. We have tested this a lot but it is something new to switch subtargets
so we don't want any chance of regression in the mainline compiler until
we have more confidence in this.
Mips32/64 are very different from Mip16 as is the case of ARM vs Thumb1.
For that reason there are derived versions of the register info, frame info,
instruction info and instruction selection classes.
Now we register three separate passes for instruction selection.
One which is used to switch subtargets (MipsModuleISelDAGToDAG.cpp) and then
one for each of the current subtargets (Mips16ISelDAGToDAG.cpp and
MipsSEISelDAGToDAG.cpp).
When the ModuleISel pass runs, it determines if there is a need to switch
subtargets and if so, the owning pointers in MipsTargetMachine are
appropriately changed.
When 16Isel or SEIsel is run, they will return immediately without doing
any work if the current subtarget mode does not apply to them.
In addition, MipsAsmPrinter needs to be reset on a function basis.
The pass BasicTargetTransformInfo is substituted with a null pass since the
pass is immutable and really needs to be a function pass for it to be
used with changing subtargets. This will be fixed in a follow on patch.
llvm-svn: 179118
but I cannot reproduce the problem and have scrubed my sources and
even tested with llvm-lit -v --vg.
Formatting fixes. Mostly long lines and
blank spaces at end of lines.
Contributer: Jack Carter
llvm-svn: 172882
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Fix a couple of bugs in mips' long branch pass.
This patch was supposed to be committed along with r162731, so I don't have a
new test case.
llvm-svn: 162777
Instructions emitted to compute branch offsets now use immediate operands
instead of symbolic labels. This change was needed because there were problems
when R_MIPS_HI16/LO16 relocations were used to make shared objects.
llvm-svn: 162731
This pass no longer requires that the global pointer value be saved to the
stack or register since it uses bal instruction to compute branch distance.
llvm-svn: 160601
Vasileios Kalintiris