This surprisingly isn't NFC because there are patterns to select GPR
sub to SUBSWrr (rather than SUBWrr/rs); SUBS is later optimized to
SUB if NZCV is dead. From ISel's perspective, both are fine.
llvm-svn: 293010
Since r279760, we've been marking as legal operations on narrow integer
types that have wider legal equivalents (for instance, G_ADD s8).
Compared to legalizing these operations, this reduced the amount of
extends/truncates required, but was always a weird legalization decision
made at selection time.
So far, we haven't been able to formalize it in a way that permits the
selector generated from SelectionDAG patterns to be sufficient.
Using a wide instruction (say, s64), when a narrower instruction exists
(s32) would introduce register class incompatibilities (when one narrow
generic instruction is selected to the wider variant, but another is
selected to the narrower variant).
It's also impractical to limit which narrow operations are matched for
which instruction, as restricting "narrow selection" to ranges of types
clashes with potentially incompatible instruction predicates.
Concerns were also raised regarding MIPS64's sign-extended register
assumptions, as well as wrapping behavior.
See discussions in https://reviews.llvm.org/D26878.
Instead, legalize the operations.
Should we ever revert to selecting these narrow operations, we should
try to represent this more accurately: for instance, by separating
a "concrete" type on operations, and an "underlying" type on vregs, we
could move the "this narrow-looking op is really legal" decision to the
legalizer, and let the selector use the "underlying" vreg type only,
which would be guaranteed to map to a register class.
In any case, we eventually should mitigate:
- the performance impact by selecting no-op extract/truncates to COPYs
(which we currently do), and the COPYs to register reuses (which we
don't do yet).
- the compile-time impact by optimizing away extract/truncate sequences
in the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 292827
This adds a basic tablegen backend that analyzes the SelectionDAG
patterns to find simple ones that are eligible for GlobalISel-emission.
That's similar to FastISel, with one notable difference: we're not fed
ISD opcodes, so we need to map the SDNode operators to generic opcodes.
That's done using GINodeEquiv in TargetGlobalISel.td.
Otherwise, this is mostly boilerplate, and lots of filtering of any kind
of "complicated" pattern. On AArch64, this is sufficient to match G_ADD
up to s64 (to ADDWrr/ADDXrr) and G_BR (to B).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26878
llvm-svn: 290284
We were using the correct pseudo-instruction, but because the operand's flags
weren't set correctly we still ended up emitting incorrect relocations during
MC lowering.
llvm-svn: 289566
This makes it more similar to the floating-point constant, and also allows for
larger constants to be translated later. There's no real functional change in
this patch though, just syntax updates.
llvm-svn: 288712
Self-referencing PHI nodes need their destination operands to be constrained
because nothing else is likely to do so. For now we just pick a register class
naively.
Patch mostly by Ahmed again.
llvm-svn: 286183
AArch64 actually supports many 8-bit operations under the definition used by
GlobalISel: the designated information-carrying bits of a GPR32 get the right
value if you just use the normal 32-bit instruction.
llvm-svn: 284526
Although Copies are not specific to preISel, we still have to assign them
a proper register class. However, given they are not constrained to
anything we do not have to handle the source register at the copy. It
will be properly mapped when reaching the related definition.
In the process, the handlong of G_ANYEXT is slightly modified as those
end up being selected as copy. The difference is that when register size
do not match on both sides, we need to insert SUBREG_TO_REG operation,
otherwise the post RA copy expansion will not be happy!
llvm-svn: 283972
This only adds the support for 64-bit vector OR. Adding more sizes is
not difficult, but it requires a bigger refactoring because ORs work on
any size, not necessarly the ones that match the width of the register
width. Right now, this is not expressed in the legalization, so don't
bother pushing the refactoring yet.
llvm-svn: 283831
It was only really there as a sentinel when instructions had to have precisely
one type. Now that registers are typed, each register really has to have a type
that is sized.
llvm-svn: 281599
Otherwise everything that needs to work out what size they are has to keep a
DataLayout handy, which is a bit silly and very annoying.
llvm-svn: 281597
These instructions were only necessary when type information was stored in the
MachineInstr (because only generic MachineInstrs possessed a type). Now that
it's in MachineRegisterInfo, COPY and PHI work fine.
llvm-svn: 281037
We want each register to have a canonical type, which means the best place to
store this is in MachineRegisterInfo rather than on every MachineInstr that
happens to use or define that register.
Most changes following from this are pretty simple (you need an MRI anyway if
you're going to be doing any transformations, so just check the type there).
But legalization doesn't really want to check redundant operands (when, for
example, a G_ADD only ever has one type) so I've made use of MCInstrDesc's
operand type field to encode these constraints and limit legalization's work.
As an added bonus, more validation is possible, both in MachineVerifier and
MachineIRBuilder (coming soon).
llvm-svn: 281035
They're another source of generic vregs, which are going to need a type on the
definition when we remove the register width from MachineRegisterInfo.
llvm-svn: 280412
More preparation for dropping source types from MachineInstrs: regsters coming
out of already-selected code (i.e. non-generic instructions) don't have a type,
but that information is needed so we must add it manually.
This is done via a new G_TYPE instruction.
llvm-svn: 280292
There is no REM instruction; that will require an expansion.
It's not obvious that should be done in select, rather than as a
(custom?) legalization.
llvm-svn: 279074
Mostly straightforward as we ignore addressing modes and just
use the base + unsigned immediate offset (always 0) variants.
This currently fails to select extloads because we have yet to
agree on a representation.
llvm-svn: 277171
LLT() has a particular meaning: it's one invalid type. But we really
want selected instructions to have no type whatsoever.
Also verify that types don't linger after ISel, and enable the verifier
on the AArch64 select test.
llvm-svn: 277001
Ahmed Bougacha