Add ARM support for dllexport and dllimport attributes. This is a relatively
conservative change. The alternative is to entirely drop the architecture
requirement. The dllimport and dllexport attributes are not restricted to any
architecture, simply to platforms that support this attribute (currently
Windows).
llvm-svn: 208486
The loop body used to contain a switch statement; it looks like r96685 replaced
that with an if/else if/else but accidentally left one of the three break
statements from the switch behind, skipping the clang_disposeString() call
for replacements (and the rest of the loop too, which apparently doesn't make
a differences for the test cases we have).
r96685: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100215/027754.html
This too might possibly the last leak in clang (PR19521).
llvm-svn: 208483
Fixes PR19689, and possibly the last leak in clang (PR19521). PR19689 contains
a few suggestions on how to make the default argument token code a bit more
solid, these changes can possibly be landed in follow-ups.
llvm-svn: 208481
Also tidy up, simplify, and extend the test coverage to demonstrate the
limitations. This test should now fail if the bugs are fixed (&
hopefully whoever ends up in this situation sees the FIXMEs and realizes
that the test needs to be updated to positively test their change that
has fixed some or all of these issues).
I do wonder whether I could demonstrate breakage without a macro here,
but any way I slice it I can't think of a way to get two calls to the
same function on the same line/column in non-macro C++ - implicit
conversions happen at the same location as an explicit function, but
you'd never get an implicit conversion on the result of an explicit call
to the same implicit conversion operator (since the value is already
converted to the desired result)...
llvm-svn: 208468
Summary:
MSVC always passes 'sret' after 'this', unlike GCC. This required
changing a number of places in Clang that assumed the sret parameter was
always first in LLVM IR.
This fixes win64 MSVC ABI compatibility for methods returning structs.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3618
llvm-svn: 208458
r144269 changed clang_disposeDiagnostic() to be a no-op, but didn't update
code completion diagnostics. Let CXCodeCompleteResults store all diagnostics
returned by clang_codeCompleteGetDiagnostic() and then free them up in
clang_disposeCodeCompleteResults().
Code completion diagnostics referred to data stored in CXCodeCompleteResults
before already, so it wasn't possible to refer to the results of
clang_codeCompleteGetDiagnostic() after clang_disposeCodeCompleteResults()
before this change already -- hence this should be a safe, backwards-compatible
change.
Leak found by LSan, fixes PR19690.
llvm-svn: 208454
The base class is the culprit/risk here - a sealed/final derived class
with virtual functions and a non-virtual dtor can't accidentally be
polymorphically destroyed (if the base class's dtor is protected - which
also suppresses this warning).
llvm-svn: 208449
MacroArgs are owned by TokenLexer, and when a TokenLexer is destroyed, it'll
call its MacroArgs's destroy() method. destroy() only appends the MacroArg to
Preprocessor's MacroArgCache list, and Preprocessor's destructor then calls
deallocate() on all MacroArgs in that list. This method then ends up freeing
the MacroArgs's memory.
In a code completion context, Parser::cutOffParsing() gets called when a code
completion token is hit, which changes the type of the current token to
tok::eof. eof tokens aren't always ConsumeToken()ed, so
Preprocessor::HandleEndOfFile() isn't always called, and that function is
responsible for popping the macro stack.
Due to this, Preprocessor::CurTokenLexer can be non-NULL when
~Preprocessor runs. It's a unique_ptr, so it ended up being destructed after
~Preprocessor completed, and its MacroArgs thus got added to the freelist after
the code freeing things on the freelist had already completed. The fix is to
explicitly call reset() before the freelist processing happens. (See the bug
for more notes.)
llvm-svn: 208438
The thread safety analysis isn't very useful in ObjC (you can't annotate
ObjC classes or methods) but we can still analyze the actual code and
show violations in usage of C/C++ functions.
Fixes PR19541, which does not use thread safety attributes but crashes
with -Weverything.
llvm-svn: 208436
This is the clang counterpart to 208413, which ensures that Homogeneous
Floating-point Aggregates are passed in consecutive registers on ARM.
llvm-svn: 208417
This lets us diagnose and perform more complete semantic analysis when faced
with errors in the function body or declaration.
By recovering here we provide more consistent diagnostics, particularly during
interactive editing.
llvm-svn: 208394
On reflection, this is better despite the missing command-line handling
bits for remarks. Making this a remark makes it much clearer that
this is purely informational and avoids the negative connotations of a
'warning'.
llvm-svn: 208367
But keep -Wnon-modular-include-in-[framework-]module
This warning is too noisy and doesn't really indicate a problem for most
people. Even though it would only really affect people using
-Weverything, that seems bad so remove it.
llvm-svn: 208345
Large is CodeModel::Model::Large, not CodeModel::Model::Medium. Thanks to
majnemer for pointing out the typo! Its unclear how to test the mapped value in
the compiler, the tests already cover the driver side.
llvm-svn: 208335
Benjamin Kramer