A "zippered" dylib contains several LC_BUILD_VERSION load commands, usually
one each for "normal" macOS and one for macCatalyst.
These are usually created by passing something like
-shared -target arm64-apple-macos -darwin-target-variant arm64-apple-ios13.1-macabi
to clang, which turns it into
-platform_version macos 12.0.0 12.3 -platform_version "mac catalyst" 14.0.0 15.4
for the linker.
ld64.lld can read these files fine, but it can't write them. Before this
change, it would just silently use the last -platform_version flag and ignore
the rest.
This change adds a warning that writing zippered dylibs isn't implemented yet
instead.
Sadly, parts of ld64.lld's test suite relied on the previous
"silently use last flag" semantics for its test suite: `%lld` always expanded
to `ld64.lld -platform_version macos 10.15 11.0` and tests that wanted a
different value passed a 2nd `-platform_version` flag later on. But this now
produces a warning if the platform passed to `-platform_version` is not `macos`.
There weren't very many cases of this, so move these to use `%no-arg-lld` and
manually pass `-arch`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124106
Since multiple dylibs can be defined in one TBD, this is
necessary to avoid confusion.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97905
Previously, we were loading re-exports without checking whether
they were compatible with our target. Prior to {D97209}, it meant that
we were defining dylib symbols that were invalid -- usually a silent
failure unless our binary actually used them. D97209 exposed this as an
explicit error.
Along the way, I've extended our TAPI compatibility check to cover the
platform as well, instead of just checking the arch. To this end, I've
replaced MachO::Architecture with MachO::Target in our Config struct.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97867
Nico Weber