to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: This is intended to be used for indexing, e.g. in D49417
Reviewers: ioeric, omtcyfz
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49540
llvm-svn: 337527
Summary:
This is a small code change but vastly reduces noise in code completion results.
The intent of allowing this was to let [sc] ~ "strncpy" and [strcpy] ~ "strncpy"
however the benefits for unsegmented names aren't IMO worth the costs.
Test cases should be representative of the changes here.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47950
llvm-svn: 334712
Summary: Fix a couple of bugs in tests an in Quality to keep tests passing.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47815
llvm-svn: 334089
Summary:
The intent was that [ar] doesn't match "FooBar"; the first character must match
a Head character (hard requirement, not just a low score).
This matches VSCode, and was "tested" but the tests were defective.
The tests expected matches("FooBar") to fail for lack of a match. But instead
it fails because the string should be annotated - matches("FooB[ar]").
This patch makes matches("FooBar") ignore annotations, as was intended.
Fixing the code to reject weak matches for the first char causes problems:
- [bre] no longer matches "HTMLBRElement".
We allow matching against an uppercase char even if we don't think it's head.
Only do this if there's at least one lowercase, to avoid triggering on MACROS
- [print] no longer matches "sprintf".
This is hard to fix without false positives (e.g. [int] vs "sprintf"])
This patch leaves this case broken. A future patch will add a dictionary
providing custom segmentation to common names from the standard library.
Fixed a couple of index tests that indirectly relied on broken fuzzy matching.
Added const in a couple of missing places for consistency with new code.
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44003
llvm-svn: 326721
Summary:
- we match on USR, and do a field-by-field merge if both have results
- scoring is post-merge, with both sets of information available
(for now, sema priority is used if available, static score for index results)
- limit is applied to the complete result set (previously index ignored limit)
- CompletionItem is only produces for the returned results
- If the user doesn't type a scope, we send the global scope for completion
(we can improve this after D42073)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42181
llvm-svn: 322945
Without specifying the signedness of the underlying type for Action,
packing it in a 1-bit field may restrict its range to [-1, 0] which
can't represent Match.
llvm-svn: 319606
Summary:
This will be used for rescoring code completion results based on partial
identifiers.
Short-term use:
- we want to limit the number of code completion results returned to
improve performance of global completion. The scorer will be used to
rerank the results to return when the user has applied a filter.
Long-term use case:
- ranking of completion results from in-memory index
- merging of completion results from multiple sources (merging usually
works best when done at the component-score level, rescoring the
fuzzy-match quality avoids different backends needing to have
comparable scores)
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40060
llvm-svn: 319557
Chandler Carruth