for libcxx when compiled with Visual C++ on Win32 and Win64.
clang and gcc (MinGW) compilers provide these implementations themselves.
llvm-svn: 198481
We should check defined(__clang__) before the usage of the
clang diagnostic pragmas.
The [-Wswitch] warning in src/future.cpp should be ignored.
As the result, the equivalent GCC pragma is added.
llvm-svn: 197314
GCC does not support strong enum if -std=c++0x is not used.
Without the strong enum, we will see following error:
In file included from libcxx/include/ostream:131:0,
from libcxx/include/sstream:174,
from libcxx/include/complex:247,
from cpp03-headers.cpp:11:
libcxx/include/ios:419:68: error: 'io_errc' is not a class or namespace
libcxx/include/ios:420:66: error: 'io_errc' is not a class or namespace
To workaround this issue, this commit will define
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STRONG_ENUMS when we are compiling with
g++ without c++0x.
llvm-svn: 197313
type_traits:3280:31: error: expected primary-expression before 'decltype'
type_traits:3280:29: error: expected ';' at end of member declaration
memory:2415:49: error: function 'std::__1::default_delete<_Tp>::default_delete()'
defaulted on its first declaration must not have an exception-specification
memory:2435:49: error: function 'std::__1::default_delete<_Tp []>::default_delete()'
defaulted on its first declaration must not have an exception-specification
The attached patch defines _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ADVANCED_SFINAE and
_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS for gcc version < 4.7, making
the library compile with gcc 4.6.4.
llvm-svn: 195431
functions in src/support/win32/locale_win32.cpp and locale_win32.h,
calling upon vsnprintf for which there is a MingW correct alternative.
Note! __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO is not modified in this patch. In order to
use the __mingw version it must be defined before including the MingW
headers.
llvm-svn: 195044
easier to use freshly-built clang with freshly-built libc++.
Basically, this makes it possible to run clang with libc++ without
having to install it, even if you don't have any version of libc++
installed in /usr/
llvm-svn: 194825
trivial in C++03, thus making it trivial in both C++03 and C++11.
This patch allows one to opt-in/out of this decision with a macro. You can
choose to have the pair copy constructor always be trivial, or always be
non-trivial. The flag controlling this is now _LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR.
The client can define this flag to 1, and the pair copy constructor will be
trivial (when possible of course), or to 0, and the pair copy constructor will
be nontrivial.
Default settings for this flag are set in <__config> (as usual). With this
commit the default is _LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR=1 for all platforms
except __APPLE__, which defaults to _LIBCPP_TRIVIAL_PAIR_COPY_CTOR=0.
llvm-svn: 194742
pair, and a couple of pair-like implementation detail types. The
C++98/03 and 11 standards all specify that the copy constructor of
pair<int, int> is trivial. However as libc++ tracked the draft C++11
standard over the years, this copy constructor became non-trivial, and
then just recently was corrected back to trivial for C++11.
Unfortunately (for libc++1) the Itanium ABI specifies different calling
conventions for trivial and non-trivial copy constructors. Therefore
currently the C++03 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int> is ABI
incompatible with the C++11 libc++ copy constructor for pair<int, int>.
This is Bad(tm). This patch corrects the situation by making this copy
constructor trivial in C++03 mode as well.
Just in case it is needed for an incomplete C++11 compiler, libc++
retains the ability to support pair with rvalue references, but without
defaulted special members. However the pair needs non-trivial special
members to implement this special case, (as it did when clang was in
this place a couple of years ago).
During this work a bug was also found and fixed in
is_trivially_constructible.
And there is a minor drive-by fix in <__config> regarding
__type_visibility__.
A test is updated to ensure that the copy constructor of pair<int, int>
is trivial in both C++03 and C++11. This test will necessarily fail for
a compiler that implements rvalue references but not defaulted special
members.
llvm-svn: 194536
Marshall Clow