Printing typedefs or type aliases using clang_getTypeSpelling() is missing the
namespace they are defined in. This is in contrast to other types that always
yield the full typename including namespaces.
Patch by Michael Reiher!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29944
llvm-svn: 297465
This change adds a new type node, DeducedTemplateSpecializationType, to
represent a type template name that has been used as a type. This is modeled
around AutoType, and shares a common base class for representing a deduced
placeholder type.
We allow deduced class template types in a few more places than the standard
does: in conditions and for-range-declarators, and in new-type-ids. This is
consistent with GCC and with discussion on the core reflector. This patch
does not yet support deduced class template types being named in typename
specifiers.
llvm-svn: 293207
* Update version number in DR tests from 4.0 to 4
* Teach make_cxx_dr_status script about version numbers that don't contain a
period.
* Update cxx_status.html and cxx_dr_status.html to list Clang 4 features as
"Clang 4" rather than "SVN"
Clang 4 features are still listed in yellow rather than green until release.
llvm-svn: 291871
We continue to support dynamic exception specifications in C++1z as an
extension, but produce an error-by-default warning when we encounter one. This
allows users to opt back into the feature with a warning flag, and implicitly
opts system headers back into the feature should they happen to use it.
There is one semantic change implied by P0003R5 but not implemented here:
violating a throw() exception specification should now call std::terminate
directly instead of calling std::unexpected(), but since P0003R5 also removes
std::unexpected() and std::set_unexpected, and the default unexpected handler
calls std::terminate(), a conforming C++1z program cannot tell that we are
still calling it. The upside of this strategy is perfect backwards
compatibility; the downside is that we don't get the more efficient 'noexcept'
codegen for 'throw()'.
llvm-svn: 289019
This has two significant effects:
1) Direct relational comparisons between null pointer constants (0 and nullopt)
and pointers are now ill-formed. This was always the case for C, and it
appears that C++ only ever permitted by accident. For instance, cases like
nullptr < &a
are now rejected.
2) Comparisons and conditional operators between differently-cv-qualified
pointer types now work, and produce a composite type that both source
pointer types can convert to (when possible). For instance, comparison
between 'int **' and 'const int **' is now valid, and uses an intermediate
type of 'const int *const *'.
Clang previously supported #2 as an extension.
We do not accept the cases in #1 as an extension. I've tested a fair amount of
code to check that this doesn't break it, but if it turns out that someone is
relying on this, we can easily add it back as an extension.
This is a re-commit of r284800.
llvm-svn: 284890
This has two significant effects:
1) Direct relational comparisons between null pointer constants (0 and nullopt)
and pointers are now ill-formed. This was always the case for C, and it
appears that C++ only ever permitted by accident. For instance, cases like
nullptr < &a
are now rejected.
2) Comparisons and conditional operators between differently-cv-qualified
pointer types now work, and produce a composite type that both source
pointer types can convert to (when possible). For instance, comparison
between 'int **' and 'const int **' is now valid, and uses an intermediate
type of 'const int *const *'.
Clang previously supported #2 as an extension.
We do not accept the cases in #1 as an extension. I've tested a fair amount of
code to check that this doesn't break it, but if it turns out that someone is
relying on this, we can easily add it back as an extension.
llvm-svn: 284800
by overload resolution because deduction succeeds, but the substituted
parameter type for some parameter (with deduced type) doesn't exactly match the
corresponding adjusted argument type.
llvm-svn: 256657
specification) to an error. No compiler other than Clang seems to allow this,
and it doesn't seem like a useful thing to accept as an extension in general.
The current behavior was added for PR5957, where the problem was specifically
related to mismatches of the exception specification on the implicitly-declared
global operator new and delete. To retain that workaround, we downgrade the
error to an ExtWarn when the declaration is of a replaceable global allocation
function.
Now that this is an error, stop trying (and failing) to recover from a missing
computed noexcept specification. That recovery didn't work, and led to crashes
in code like the added testcase.
llvm-svn: 248867
The parser can only be tricked into parsing a function template
definition by inserting a typename keyword before the function template
declaration. This used to make us crash, and now it's fixed.
While here, remove an unneeded boolean parameter from ParseDeclGroup.
This boolean always corresponded to non-typedef declarators at file
scope. ParseDeclGroup already has precise diagnostics for the function
definition typedef case, so we can let that through.
Fixes PR21839.
llvm-svn: 224287
"protected scope" is very unhelpful here and actively confuses users. Instead,
simply state the nature of the problem in the diagnostic: we cannot jump from
here to there. The notes explain nicely why not.
llvm-svn: 217293
use __thiscall. (This doesn't actually work for MSVC; they don't allow the
__thiscall qualifier here, but it's sufficient to demonstrate that we do
implement the intent of the DR.)
llvm-svn: 217213
With targeting i686-win32,
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 521: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 518: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 518: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
error: 'note' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 521: in instantiation of function template specialization 'dr547::f<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const, dr547::S>' requested here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
7 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 216841
Richard Smith