A new function 'getConstrainedIntrinsic' is added, which for any gived
instruction returns id of the corresponding constrained intrinsic. If
there is no constrained counterpart for the instruction or the instruction
is already a constrained intrinsic, the function returns zero.
This is recommit of 115b3ace36, reverted in
8160dd582b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69562
This reverts commit 115b3ace36.
Starting from this commit the buildbot sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan
starts failing (build 10071). Reverted for investigation.
A new function 'getConstrainedIntrinsic' is added, which for any gived
instruction returns id of the corresponding constrained intrinsic. If
there is no constrained counterpart for the instruction or the instruction
is already a constrained intrinsic, the function returns zero.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69562
Fix a dangling else that gcc-11 warned about. The EXPECT_EQ macro
expands to an if-else, so the whole construction contains a hidden
dangling else.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113346
When we have an actual shuffle, we can impose the additional restriction
that the mask replicates the elements of the first operand, so we know
the replication factor as a ratio of output and op0 vector sizes.
These tests have pretty high O() complexity due to their nature,
which leads to potentially-long runtimes.
While in release build for me they took ~1 and ~2 sec,
as noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214#inline-1080479
they take minutes in debug build.
Fine-tune the amount of permutations they deal with,
without affecting the test coverage. After this,
they take <~10ms each for me (in release build),
hopefully that is good-enough for debug build too.
Avid readers of this saga may recall from previous installments,
that replication mask replicates (lol) each of the `VF` elements
in a vector `ReplicationFactor` times. For example, the mask for
`ReplicationFactor=3` and `VF=4` is: `<0,0,0,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3>`.
More importantly, replication mask is used by LoopVectorizer
when using masked interleaved memory operations.
As discussed in previous installments, while it is used by LV,
and we **seem** to support masked interleaved memory operations on X86,
it's support in cost model leaves a lot to be desired:
until basically yesterday even for AVX512 we had no cost model for it.
As it has been witnessed in the recent
AVX2 `X86TTIImpl::getInterleavedMemoryOpCost()`
costmodel patches, while it is hard-enough to query the cost
of a particular assembly sequence [from llvm-mca],
afterwards the check lines LV costmodel tests must be updated manually.
This is, at the very least, boring.
Okay, now we have decent costmodel coverage for interleaving shuffles,
but now basically the same mind-killing sequence has to be performed
for replication mask. I think we can improve at least the second half
of the problem, by teaching
the `TargetTransformInfoImplCRTPBase::getUserCost()` to recognize
`Instruction::ShuffleVector` that are repetition masks,
adding exhaustive test coverage
using `-cost-model -analyze` + `utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py`
This way we can have good exhaustive coverage for cost model,
and only basic coverage for the LV costmodel.
This patch adds precise undef-aware `isReplicationMask()`,
with exhaustive test coverage.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask` shows that
it correctly detects all the known masks.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_undef`
shows that replacing some mask elements in a known replication mask
still allows us to recognize it as a replication mask.
Note, with enough undef elts, we may detect a different tuple.
* `InstructionsTest.ShuffleMaskIsReplicationMask_Exhaustive_Correctness`
shows that if we detected the replication mask with given params,
then if we actually generate a true replication mask with said params,
it matches element-wise ignoring undef mask elements.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113214
This makes it slightly easier to deal with custom attributes and
CallBase already provides hasFnAttr versions that support both AttrKind
and StringRef arguments in a similar fashion.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92567
It was removed back in 2013 (f63dfbb) by Matt Arsenault but then
reverted since DragonEgg used it, but that project is no longer
maintained.
Reviewed By: ldionne, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92571
Shuffle mask for concat can't be expressed for scalable vectors, so we
should bail out. A test has been added that previously crashed, also
tested isIdentityWithPadding and isIdentityWithExtract where we already
bail out.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92475
Since the length of the llvm::SmallVector shufflemask is related to the
minimum number of elements in a scalable vector, it is fine to just get
the Min field of the ElementCount. This is already done for the similar
function changesLength, tests have been added for both.
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92472
It's not possible to express an extract subvector shuffle mask for
a scalable vector.
Reviewed By: david-arm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92312
Typically branch_weights are i32, not i64.
This fixes entry_counts_cold.ll under NPM.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90539
Introduce a helper which can be used to update the debug location of an
Instruction after the instruction is hoisted. This can be used to safely
drop a source location as recommended by the docs.
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
Introduce a helper on Instruction which can be used to update the debug
location after hoisting.
Use this in GVN and LICM, where we were mistakenly introducing new line
0 locations after hoisting (the docs recommend dropping the location in
this case).
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
Summary:
This extends the rules for when a call instruction is deemed to be an
FPMathOperator, which is based on the type of the call (i.e. the return
type of the function being called). Previously we only allowed
floating-point and vector-of-floating-point types. Now we also allow
arrays (nested to any depth) of floating-point and
vector-of-floating-point types.
This was motivated by llpc, the pipeline compiler for AMD GPUs
(https://github.com/GPUOpen-Drivers/llpc). llpc has many math library
functions that operate on vectors, typically represented as <4 x float>,
and some that operate on matrices, typically represented as
[4 x <4 x float>], and it's useful to be able to decorate calls to all
of them with fast math flags.
Reviewers: spatel, wristow, arsenm, hfinkel, aemerson, efriedma, cameron.mcinally, mcberg2017, jmolloy
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69161
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D61917>
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372878
The changes here are based on the corresponding diffs for allowing FMF on 'select':
D61917
As discussed there, we want to have fast-math-flags be a property of an FP value
because the alternative (having them on things like fcmp) leads to logical
inconsistency such as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
The earlier patch for select made almost no practical difference because most
unoptimized conditional code begins life as a phi (based on what I see in clang).
Similarly, I don't expect this patch to do much on its own either because
SimplifyCFG promptly drops the flags when converting to select on a minimal
example like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39535
But once we have this plumbing in place, we should be able to wire up the FMF
propagation and start solving cases like that.
The change to RecurrenceDescriptor::AddReductionVar() is required to prevent a
regression in a LoopVectorize test. We are intersecting the FMF of any
FPMathOperator there, so if a phi is not properly annotated, new math
instructions may not be either. Once we fix the propagation in SimplifyCFG, it
may be safe to remove that hack.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67564
llvm-svn: 372866
Summary:
There's an unspoken invariant of callbr that the list of BlockAddress
Constants in the "function args" list match the BasicBlocks in the
"other labels" list. (This invariant is being added to the LangRef in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67196).
When modifying the any of the indirect destinations of a callbr
instruction (possible jump targets), we need to update the function
arguments if the argument is a BlockAddress whose BasicBlock refers to
the indirect destination BasicBlock being replaced. Otherwise, many
transforms that modify successors will end up violating that invariant.
A recent change to the arm64 Linux kernel exposed this bug, which
prevents the kernel from booting.
I considered maintaining a mapping from indirect destination BasicBlock
to argument operand BlockAddress, but this ends up being a one to
potentially many (though usually one) mapping. Also, the list of
arguments to a function (or more typically inline assembly) ends up
being less than 10. The implementation is significantly simpler to just
rescan the full list of arguments. Because of the one to potentially
many relationship, the full arg list must be scanned (we can't stop at
the first instance).
Thanks to the following folks that reported the issue and helped debug
it:
* Nathan Chancellor
* Will Deacon
* Andrew Murray
* Craig Topper
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43222
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/649
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-September/678330.html
Reviewers: craig.topper, chandlerc
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: void, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits, nathanchance, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67252
llvm-svn: 371262
This patch removes the test part that relates to the non-strict
behavior of SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper and changes
the assertion to llvm_unreachable() to allow the check in
release builds.
This patch prepares SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper to become
strict with one line change. That is need to revert it easily
if any failure will arise.
llvm-svn: 365439
While prof branch_weights inconsistencies are being fixed patch
by patch (pass by pass) we need SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper to
be safe with respect to inconsistent metadata that can come from
passes that have not been fixed yet. See the bug found by @nikic
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D62126.
This patch introduces one more state (called Invalid) to the
wrapper class that allows users to work with the underlying
SwitchInst ignoring the prof metadata changes.
Created a unit test for the SwitchInstProfUpdateWrapper class.
Reviewers: davidx, nikic, eraman, reames, chandlerc
Reviewed By: davidx
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62656
llvm-svn: 362473
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
This cleans up all InvokeInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57171
llvm-svn: 352910
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This was one of the potential follow-ups suggested in D48236,
and these will be used to make matching the patterns in PR38691 cleaner:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38691
About the vocabulary: in the DAG, these would be concat_vector with an
undef operand or extract_subvector. Alternate names are discussed in the
review, but I think these are familiar/good enough to proceed. Once we
have uses of them in code, we might adjust if there are better options.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D51392
llvm-svn: 341075
This addresses post-commit feedback about the name 'skipDebugInfo' being
misleading. This name could be interpreted as meaning 'a function that
skips instructions with debug locations'.
The new name, 'skipDebugIntrinsics', makes it clear that this function
only skips debug info intrinsics.
Thanks to Adrian Prantl for pointing this out!
llvm-svn: 335667
This patch introduces two helpers to make it easier to ignore debug
intrinsics:
- Instruction::getNextNonDebugInstruction()
This is just like Instruction::getNextNode(), except that it skips debug
info.
- skipDebugInfo(BasicBlock::iterator)
A free function which advances a BasicBlock iterator past any debug
info. This is a no-op when the iterator already points to a non-debug
instruction.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37728
Related to: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47874
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48305
llvm-svn: 335083
The optimizer is getting smarter (eg, D47986) about differentiating shuffles
based on its mask values, so we should make queries on the mask constant
operand generally available to avoid code duplication.
We'll probably use this soon in the vectorizers and instcombine (D48023 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806).
We might clean up TTI a bit more once all of its current 'SK_*' options are
covered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48236
llvm-svn: 335067
Jack Andersen