Avoid repeating CMake checks across runtimes by unifying names of
variables used for results to leverage CMake caching.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110005
Since a8d15a9266 / D110975, this is
the default, even if winpthread headers are available, so we don't
need to cargo cult setting this option in all builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122717
This means that re-running with llvm-lit in that configuration will
work as expected. This also enables assertions in libc++abi in the
Generic-assertions CI job, which was disabled previously.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122597
This patch adds a lightweight assertion handler mechanism that can be
overriden at link-time in a fashion similar to `operator new`.
This is a third take on https://llvm.org/D121123 (which allowed customizing
the assertion handler at compile-time), and https://llvm.org/D119969
(which allowed customizing the assertion handler at runtime only).
This approach is, I think, the best of all three explored approaches.
Indeed, replacing the assertion handler in user code is ergonomic,
yet we retain the ability to provide a custom assertion handler when
deploying to older platforms that don't have a default handler in
the dylib.
As-is, this patch provides a pretty good amount of backwards compatibility
with the previous debug mode:
- Code that used to set _LIBCPP_DEBUG=0 in order to get basic assertions
in their code will still get basic assertions out of the box, but
those assertions will be using the new assertion handler support.
- Code that was previously compiled with references to __libcpp_debug_function
and friends will work out-of-the-box, no changes required. This is
because we provide the same symbols in the dylib as we used to.
- Code that used to set a custom __libcpp_debug_function will stop
compiling, because we don't provide that declaration anymore. Users
will have to migrate to the new way of setting a custom assertion
handler, which is extremely easy. I suspect that pool of users is
very limited, so breaking them at compile-time is probably acceptable.
The main downside of this approach is that code being compiled with
assertions enabled but deploying to an older platform where the assertion
handler didn't exist yet will fail to compile. However users can easily
fix the problem by providing a custom assertion handler and defining
the _LIBCPP_AVAILABILITY_CUSTOM_ASSERTION_HANDLER_PROVIDED macro to
let the library know about the custom handler. In a way, this is
actually a feature because it avoids a load-time error that one would
otherwise get when trying to run the code on the older target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121478
It's the role of the C++ ABI library to install its own headers, not libc++.
This fixes an existing issue causing spurious CI failures where both libc++
and libc++abi would try to install <cxxabi.h> & friends in the same location,
leading to failures during the installation step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121706
Add an explicit LIBCXX_CXX_ABI=system-libcxxabi option for linking to
system-installed libc++abi. This fixes the ability to link against one
when building libcxx via the runtimes build, as otherwise the build
system insists on linking into in-tree targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119539
This commit reverts 5aaefa51 (and also partly 7f285f48e7 and b6d75682f9,
which were related to the original commit). As landed, 5aaefa51 had
unintended consequences on some downstream bots and didn't have proper
coverage upstream due to a few subtle things. Implementing this is
something we should do in libc++, however we'll first need to address
a few issues listed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124#3349710.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120683
libc++ has started splicing standard library headers into much more
fine-grained content for maintainability. It's very likely that outdated
and naive tooling (some of which is outside of LLVM's scope) will
suggest users include things such as <__ranges/access.h> instead of
<ranges>, and Hyrum's law suggests that users will eventually begin to
rely on this without the help of tooling. As such, this commit
intends to protect users from themselves, by making it a hard error for
anyone outside of the standard library to include libc++ detail headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106124
As suggested by the cmake warning:
CMake Warning at <...>/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/libcxx/CMakeLists.txt:289 (message):
LIBCXX_TARGET_TRIPLE is deprecated, please use CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_TARGET instead
Depends on D119948
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120038
This patch upstreams some changes we've made internally to how we're
building the libc++ dylib on Apple platforms. The goal is still to
eventually get rid of `apple-install-libcxx.sh` entirely and have a
proper way to mirror what we do internally with just the normal CMake
configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118912
This works around a known issue in ASan. ASan doesn't instrument weak
symbols. Because instrumentation increases object size, the binary can
end up with two versions of the same object, one instrumented and one
not instrumented, with different sizes, which ASan will report as an ODR
violation. In libc++, this affects typeinfo for `std::bad_function_call`
which is emitted as a weak symbol in the test executable and as a strong
symbol in the shared library.
The main open issue for ASan appears to be
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/1017.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119410
There is no reason for the parts of std::span that don't depend on ranges
to be disabled when ranges aren't provided. Also, to make sure the
"no-experimental-stuff" configuration is tested, add a CI job for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118740
We previously had a few varied definitions of this floating around.
I had tried to make the one installed with LLVM handle all the cases, and then made the others use it, but this ran into issues with `HandleOutOfTreeLLVM` not working for compiler-rt, and also `CMAKE_EXE_LINKER_FLAGS` not working right without `CMP0056` set to the new behavior.
My compromise solution is this:
- No not completely deduplicate: the runtime libs will instead use a version that still exists as part of the internal and not installed common shared CMake utilities. This avoids `HandleOutOfTreeLLVM` or a workaround for compiler-rt.
- Continue to use `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS`, which effects compilation and linking. Maybe this is unnecessary, but it's safer to leave that as a future change. Also means we can avoid `CMP0056` for now, to try out later, which is good incrementality too.
- Call it `llvm_check_compiler_linker_flag` since it, in fact is about both per its implementation (before and after this patch), so there is no name collision.
In the future, we might still enable CMP0056 and make compiler-rt work with HandleOutOfTreeLLVM, which case we delete `llvm_check_compiler_flag` and go back to the old way (as these are, in fact, linking related flags), but that I leave for someone else as future work.
The original issue was reported to me in https://reviews.llvm.org/D116521#3248117 as
D116521 made clang and LLVM use the common cmake utils.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne, phosek, #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117537
We previously had a few varied definitions of this floating around. I made the one installed with LLVM handle all the cases, and then made the others use it.
This issue was reported to me in https://reviews.llvm.org/D116521#3248117 as
D116521 made clang and llvm use the common cmake utils.
Reviewed By: sebastian-ne, phosek, #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117537
This is better than libunwind and libcxxabi fishing it out of libcxx's
module directory.
It is done in prepartion for a better version of D117537 which deduplicates
CMake logic instead of just renaming to avoid a name clash.
Reviewed By: phosek, #libunwind, #libc_abi, Ericson2314
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117617
This is the original patch in my GNUInstallDirs series, now last to merge as the final piece!
It arose as a new draft of D28234. I initially did the unorthodox thing of pushing to that when I wasn't the original author, but since I ended up
- Using `GNUInstallDirs`, rather than mimicking it, as the original author was hesitant to do but others requested.
- Converting all the packages, not just LLVM, effecting many more projects than LLVM itself.
I figured it was time to make a new revision.
I have used this patch series (and many back-ports) as the basis of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/111487 for my distro (NixOS), which was merged last spring (2021). It looked like people were generally on board in D28234, but I make note of this here in case extra motivation is useful.
---
As pointed out in the original issue, a central tension is that LLVM already has some partial support for these sorts of things. Variables like `COMPILER_RT_INSTALL_PATH` have already been dealt with. Variables like `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` however, will require further work, so that we may use `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`.
These remaining items will be addressed in further patches. What is here is now rote and so we should get it out of the way before dealing more intricately with the remainder.
Reviewed By: #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99484
This is the original patch in my GNUInstallDirs series, now last to merge as the final piece!
It arose as a new draft of D28234. I initially did the unorthodox thing of pushing to that when I wasn't the original author, but since I ended up
- Using `GNUInstallDirs`, rather than mimicking it, as the original author was hesitant to do but others requested.
- Converting all the packages, not just LLVM, effecting many more projects than LLVM itself.
I figured it was time to make a new revision.
I have used this patch series (and many back-ports) as the basis of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/111487 for my distro (NixOS), which was merged last spring (2021). It looked like people were generally on board in D28234, but I make note of this here in case extra motivation is useful.
---
As pointed out in the original issue, a central tension is that LLVM already has some partial support for these sorts of things. Variables like `COMPILER_RT_INSTALL_PATH` have already been dealt with. Variables like `LLVM_LIBDIR_SUFFIX` however, will require further work, so that we may use `CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR`.
These remaining items will be addressed in further patches. What is here is now rote and so we should get it out of the way before dealing more intricately with the remainder.
Reviewed By: #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99484
When building libcxx, libcxxabi, and libunwind the build environment may
specify any number of sanitizers. For some build feature tests these
sanitizers must be disabled to prevent spurious linking errors. With
-fsanitize= this is straight forward with -fno-sanitize=all. With
-fsanitize-coverage= there is no -fno-sanitize-coverage=all, but there
is the equivalent undocumented but tested -fsanitize-coverage=0.
The current build rules fail to disable 'trace-pc-guard'. By disabling
all sanitize-coverage flags, including 'trace-pc-guard', possible
spurious linker errors are prevented. In particular, this allows libcxx,
libcxxabi, and libunwind to be built with HonggFuzz.
CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS is extra compile flags when running CMake build
configuration steps (like check_cxx_compiler_flag). It does not affect
the compile flags for the actual build of the project (unless of course
these flags change whether or not a given source compiles and links or
not). So libcxx, libcxxabi, and libunwind will still be built with any
specified sanitize-coverage as before. The build configuration steps
(which are mostly checking to see if certain compiler flags are
available) will not try to compile and link "int main() { return 0;}"
(or other specified source) with sanitize-coverage (which can fail to
link at this stage in building, since the final compile flags required
are yet to be determined).
The change to LIBFUZZER_CFLAGS was done to keep it consistent with the
obvious intention of disabling all sanitize-coverage. This appears to
be intentional, preventing the fuzzer driver itself from showing up in
any coverage calculations.
Reviewed By: #libunwind, #libc, #libc_abi, ldionne, phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116050
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
This is similar to the existing setting LIBCXX_ABI_DEFINES, with
the difference that this also allows setting other defines than
ones that start with "_LIBCPP_ABI_", and allows setting defines
to a specific value.
This allows avoiding using LIBCXX_TEST_COMPILER_FLAGS in two
CI configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116109
This does mostly the same as D112126, but for the runtimes cmake files.
Most of that is straightforward, but the interdependency between
libcxx and libunwind is tricky:
Libunwind is built at the same time as libcxx, but libunwind is not
installed yet. LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER makes libcxx link directly
against the just-built libunwind, but the compiler implicit -lunwind
isn't found. This patch avoids that by adding --unwindlib=none if
supported, if we are going to link explicitly against a newly built
unwinder anyway.
Since the previous attempt, this no longer uses
llvm_enable_language_nolink (and thus doesn't set
CMAKE_TRY_COMPILE_TARGET_TYPE=STATIC_LIBRARY during the compiler
sanity checks). Setting CMAKE_TRY_COMPILE_TARGET_TYPE=STATIC_LIBRARY
during compiler sanity checks makes cmake not learn about some
aspects of the compiler, which can make further find_library or
find_package fail. This caused OpenMP to not detect libelf and libffi,
disabling some OpenMP target plugins.
Instead, require the caller to set CMAKE_{C,CXX}_COMPILER_WORKS=YES
when building in a configuration with an incomplete toolchain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113253
This reverts commit 317dc31e53.
After that change, OpenMP doesn't find dependencies in the host
system (it fails do find e.g. /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libelf.so
which it found before), which causes some OpenMP target offloading
plugins to not be found. This doesn't break the build, but just
causes the AMDGPU OpenMP target plugin to be omitted. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/D113253#3181934 for the report of this
issue.
This does mostly the same as D112126, but for the runtimes cmake files.
Most of that is straightforward, but the interdependency between
libcxx and libunwind is tricky:
Libunwind is built at the same time as libcxx, but libunwind is not
installed yet. LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER makes libcxx link directly
against the just-built libunwind, but the compiler implicit -lunwind
isn't found. This patch avoids that by adding --unwindlib=none if
supported, if we are going to link explicitly against a newly built
unwinder anyway.
Reapplying this after
db32c4f456, which should fix the issues
that were reported last time this was applied.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113253
This patch removes the ability to build the runtimes in the 32 bit
multilib configuration, i.e. using -m32. Instead of doing this, one
should cross-compile the runtimes for the appropriate target triple,
like we do for all other triples.
As it stands, -m32 has several issues, which all seem to be related to
the fact that it's not well supported by the operating systems that
libc++ support. The simplest path towards fixing this is to remove
support for the configuration, which is also the best course of action
if there is little interest for keeping that configuration. If there
is a desire to keep this configuration around, we'll need to do some
work to figure out the underlying issues and fix them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114473
Mention support for MinGW in the docs. Rename the existing windows
CI jobs to Clang-cl, as both Clang-cl and MinGW are equally much
"Windows", just different toolchain environments.
Add an XFAIL for a recently added test that fails in the MinGW DLL
configuration (with an explanation of what's causing the failure).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112215
This does mostly the same as D112126, but for the runtimes cmake files.
Most of that is straightforward, but the interdependency between
libcxx and libunwind is tricky:
Libunwind is built at the same time as libcxx, but libunwind is not
installed yet. LIBCXXABI_USE_LLVM_UNWINDER makes libcxx link directly
against the just-built libunwind, but the compiler implicit -lunwind
isn't found. This patch avoids that by adding --unwindlib=none if
supported, if we are going to link explicitly against a newly built
unwinder anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113253
There's a lot of duplicated calls to find various compiler-rt libraries
from build of runtime libraries like libunwind, libc++, libc++abi and
compiler-rt. The compiler-rt helper module already implemented caching
for results avoid repeated Clang invocations.
This change moves the compiler-rt implementation into a shared location
and reuses it from other runtimes to reduce duplication and speed up
the build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88458
This temporary FIXME really belongs to the testing config, not to the
specific CMake cache that enables that configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112031
There's a lot of duplicated calls to find various compiler-rt libraries
from build of runtime libraries like libunwind, libc++, libc++abi and
compiler-rt. The compiler-rt helper module already implemented caching
for results avoid repeated Clang invocations.
This change moves the compiler-rt implementation into a shared location
and reuses it from other runtimes to reduce duplication and speed up
the build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88458
Phabricator Review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99836
A couple of parallel patterns still remains serial - "Parallel partial sort", and "Parallel transform scan" - there are //TODOs in the code.
This initial change adds the AIX configuration to run-buildbot, an AIX
CMake cache file, and appropriate compiler and linker flags for testing
AIX to the lit "from scratch" configuration files. Either of the 32-bit or 64-bit configurations
can be built by setting `OBJECT_MODE` in the build environment (as is
typical for AIX).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111244
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
location might be different, some ABI properties might differ, etc.
In the past few years, I've come across several instances where
having a place to test some of these properties would have been
incredibly useful. I also just got bitten by the lack of tests
of that kind, so I'm adding some now.
The tests added by this commit for Apple platforms have numerous
TODOs that capture discrepancies between the upstream LLVM CMake
and the slightly-modified build we perform internally to produce
Apple's system libc++. In the future, the goal would be to upstream
all those differences so that it's possible to build a faithful
Apple system libc++ with the upstream LLVM sources only.
But this isn't only useful for Apple - this lays out the path for
any vendor being able to add their own checks (either upstream or
downstream) to libc++.
This is a re-application of 9892d1644f, which was reverted in 138dc27186
because it broke the build. The issue was that we didn't apply the required
changes to libunwind and our CI didn't notice it because we were not
running the libunwind tests. This has been fixed now, and we're running
the libunwind tests in CI now too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110736
Vendors take libc++ and ship it in various ways. Some vendors might
ship it differently from what upstream LLVM does, i.e. the install
location might be different, some ABI properties might differ, etc.
In the past few years, I've come across several instances where
having a place to test some of these properties would have been
incredibly useful. I also just got bitten by the lack of tests
of that kind, so I'm adding some now.
The tests added by this commit for Apple platforms have numerous
TODOs that capture discrepancies between the upstream LLVM CMake
and the slightly-modified build we perform internally to produce
Apple's system libc++. In the future, the goal would be to upstream
all those differences so that it's possible to build a faithful
Apple system libc++ with the upstream LLVM sources only.
But this isn't only useful for Apple - this lays out the path for
any vendor being able to add their own checks (either upstream or
downstream) to libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110736
This way, we do not need to set LLVM_CMAKE_PATH to LLVM_CMAKE_DIR when (NOT LLVM_CONFIG_FOUND)
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107717
When `libcxx` or `libcxxabi` is built with `-DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=MemoryWithOrigins`
**and** `-DLIBCXX[ABI]_USE_COMPILER_RT=ON`, all of the `LIBCXX[ABI]_SUPPORTS_*_FLAG`
checks fail, since the value of `CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS` is not set correctly.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51774
Reviewed By: #libc, #libc_abi, compnerd, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109342
These paths are needed when building with per-target runtime directories.
(It's possible to fix this by manually setting these when invoking
cmake, but one isn't supposed to need to do that.)
Also set LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR while touching this area (as it's
also unset in this case) even if it isn't specifically needed by the
per-target runtime configuration.
Fixed since previous attempt: Don't check if the runtimes directory
is the root of the CMake invocation; when the main LLVM CMake
build builds runtimes, it does invoke a sub-CMake with this directory
as the root too, just as if manually invoking CMake at the runtimes
directory. Instead check whether LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR was set and
whether find_package(LLVM) succeeded or not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107895
These paths are needed when building with per-target runtime directories.
(It's possible to fix this by manually setting these when invoking
cmake, but one isn't supposed to need to do that.)
Also set LLVM_TOOLS_BINARY_DIR while touching this area (as it's
also unset in this case) even if it isn't specifically needed by the
per-target runtime configuration.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107895
This option is used to select between the format headers output column
width option. This option should be independent of the locale setting.
It's encouraged to default to Unicode unless the platform doesn't offer
that option.
[format.string.std]/10
```
For the purposes of width computation, a string is assumed to be in a
locale-independent, implementation-defined encoding. Implementations
should use a Unicode encoding on platforms capable of displaying Unicode
```
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103379
Petr Hosek