Summary:
This change edits the language reference to explicitly allow the
existence of readnone and readonly functions that can throw. Full
discussion at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108637.html
Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, hfinkel, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28740
llvm-svn: 295000
Summary:
Update the TBAA section to mention the struct path TBAA that LLVM
implements today. This is not a proposal or change in semantics -- it
is intended only to **document** what LLVM already does today.
This is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D26438 where I've tried to
implement some of the constraints as verifier checks.
Reviewers: anna, reames, rsmith, chandlerc, hfinkel, rjmccall, mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, manmanren
Reviewed By: manmanren
Subscribers: dberlin, dberris, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26831
llvm-svn: 294999
Many quoted code blocks were not in sync with the actual toy.cpp
files. Improve tutorial text slightly in several places.
Added some step descriptions crucial to avoid crashes (like
InitializeNativeTarget* calls).
Solve/workaround problems with Windows (JIT'ed method not found, using
custom and standard library functions from host process).
Patch by: Moritz Kroll <moritz.kroll@gmx.de>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29864
llvm-svn: 294870
Summary:
This patch starts the implementation as discuss in the following RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html
When optimization duplicates code that will scale down the execution count of a basic block, we will record the duplication factor as part of discriminator so that the offline process tool can find the duplication factor and collect the accurate execution frequency of the corresponding source code. Two important optimization that fall into this category is loop vectorization and loop unroll. This patch records the duplication factor for these 2 optimizations.
The recording will be guarded by a flag encode-duplication-in-discriminators, which is off by default.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, davidxl, hfinkel, echristo
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, anemet, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26420
llvm-svn: 294782
The pygments syntax highlighting package used by sphinx fails to parse
newer LLVM constructs or valid (at least to me) gas constructs like
`.secrel32 _function_name + 0`.
Disable this particular warning so the build doesn't abort as fixing
pygments doesn't seem a workable option here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29794
llvm-svn: 294672
Summary:
Documentation update to reflect the changes that occured in the allocator:
- additional architectures support;
- modification of the header;
- options default values for 32 & 64-bit.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29592
llvm-svn: 294595
1. Added missing substitutions to the documentation in docs/TestingGuide.rst
2. Modified docs/CommandGuide/lit.rst to only document the "base" set of substitutions and to refer the reader to docs/TestingGuide.rst for more detailed info on substitutions.
Patch by bd1976llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29281
llvm-svn: 294586
Summary:
The intrinsic, marked as returning it's first argument, has no code
generation effect (though currently not every optimization pass knows
that intrinsics with the returned attribute can be looked through).
It is about to be used to by the PredicateInfo pass to attach
predicate information to existing operands, and be able to tell what
the predicate information affects.
We deliberately do not attach any info through a second operand so
that the intrinsics do not need to dominate the comparisons/etc (since
in the case of assume, we may want to push them up the post-dominator
tree).
Reviewers: davide, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29517
llvm-svn: 294341
Summary:
This change allows usage of store instruction for implicit null check.
Memory Aliasing Analisys is not used and change conservatively supposes
that any store and load may access the same memory. As a result
re-ordering of store-store, store-load and load-store is prohibited.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: atrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29400
llvm-svn: 294338
Summary:
This also adds docs to suggest that maintainers of buildbots for
experimental backends should use this buildmaster.
Reviewers: dsanders, grosser, asb, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: grosser
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29560
llvm-svn: 294144
@ABS8 can be applied to symbols which appear as immediate operands to
instructions that have a 8-bit immediate form for that operand. It causes
the assembler to use the 8-bit form and an 8-bit relocation (e.g. R_386_8
or R_X86_64_8) for the symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28688
llvm-svn: 293667
Summary: Change B type from double to pointer to double.
Reviewers: delena, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29009
llvm-svn: 293467
Summary:
Some frontends emit a speculate-and-select idiom for sqrt, wherein they compute
sqrt(x), check if x is negative, and select NaN if it is:
%cmp = fcmp olt double %a, -0.000000e+00
%sqrt = call double @llvm.sqrt.f64(double %a)
%ret = select i1 %cmp, double 0x7FF8000000000000, double %sqrt
This is technically UB as the LangRef is written today if %a is ever less than
-0. But emitting code that's compliant with the current definition of sqrt
would require a branch, which would then prevent us from matching this idiom in
SelectionDAG (which we do today -- ISD::FSQRT has defined behavior on negative
inputs), because SelectionDAG looks at one BB at a time.
Nothing in LLVM takes advantage of this undefined behavior, as far as we can
tell, and the fact that llvm.sqrt has UB dates from its initial addition to the
LangRef.
Reviewers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, hfinkel
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28797
llvm-svn: 293242
This commit introduces a set of experimental intrinsics intended to prevent
optimizations that make assumptions about the rounding mode and floating point
exception behavior. These intrinsics will later be extended to specify
flush-to-zero behavior. More work is also required to model instruction
dependencies in machine code and to generate these instructions from clang
(when required by pragmas and/or command line options that are not currently
supported).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27028
llvm-svn: 293226
Summary: Fix the example of equivalent expansion for when mask is all ones.
Reviewers: delena
Reviewed By: delena
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29179
llvm-svn: 293206
Document the current practice regarding dropping metadata on modules,
functions and global variables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29110
llvm-svn: 293101
and UNSUPPORTED"
After r292904 llvm-lit fails to emit the test results in the XML format for
Apple's internal buildbots.
rdar://30164800
llvm-svn: 292942
A `lit` condition line is now a comma-separated list of boolean expressions.
Comma-separated expressions act as if each expression were on its own
condition line:
For REQUIRES, if every expression is true then the test will run.
For UNSUPPORTED, if every expression is false then the test will run.
For XFAIL, if every expression is false then the test is expected to succeed.
As a special case "XFAIL: *" expects the test to fail.
Examples:
# Test is expected fail on 64-bit Apple simulators and pass everywhere else
XFAIL: x86_64 && apple && !macosx
# Test is unsupported on Windows and on non-Ubuntu Linux
# and supported everywhere else
UNSUPPORTED: linux && !ubuntu, system-windows
Syntax:
* '&&', '||', '!', '(', ')'. 'true' is true. 'false' is false.
* Each test feature is a true identifier.
* Substrings of the target triple are true identifiers for UNSUPPORTED
and XFAIL, but not for REQUIRES. (This matches the current behavior.)
* All other identifiers are false.
* Identifiers are [-+=._a-zA-Z0-9]+
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18185
llvm-svn: 292904
A `lit` condition line is now a comma-separated list of boolean expressions.
Comma-separated expressions act as if each expression were on its own
condition line:
For REQUIRES, if every expression is true then the test will run.
For UNSUPPORTED, if every expression is false then the test will run.
For XFAIL, if every expression is false then the test is expected to succeed.
As a special case "XFAIL: *" expects the test to fail.
Examples:
# Test is expected fail on 64-bit Apple simulators and pass everywhere else
XFAIL: x86_64 && apple && !macosx
# Test is unsupported on Windows and on non-Ubuntu Linux
# and supported everywhere else
UNSUPPORTED: linux && !ubuntu, system-windows
Syntax:
* '&&', '||', '!', '(', ')'. 'true' is true. 'false' is false.
* Each test feature is a true identifier.
* Substrings of the target triple are true identifiers for UNSUPPORTED
and XFAIL, but not for REQUIRES. (This matches the current behavior.)
* All other identifiers are false.
* Identifiers are [-+=._a-zA-Z0-9]+
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18185
llvm-svn: 292896
Since r279760, we've been marking as legal operations on narrow integer
types that have wider legal equivalents (for instance, G_ADD s8).
Compared to legalizing these operations, this reduced the amount of
extends/truncates required, but was always a weird legalization decision
made at selection time.
So far, we haven't been able to formalize it in a way that permits the
selector generated from SelectionDAG patterns to be sufficient.
Using a wide instruction (say, s64), when a narrower instruction exists
(s32) would introduce register class incompatibilities (when one narrow
generic instruction is selected to the wider variant, but another is
selected to the narrower variant).
It's also impractical to limit which narrow operations are matched for
which instruction, as restricting "narrow selection" to ranges of types
clashes with potentially incompatible instruction predicates.
Concerns were also raised regarding MIPS64's sign-extended register
assumptions, as well as wrapping behavior.
See discussions in https://reviews.llvm.org/D26878.
Instead, legalize the operations.
Should we ever revert to selecting these narrow operations, we should
try to represent this more accurately: for instance, by separating
a "concrete" type on operations, and an "underlying" type on vregs, we
could move the "this narrow-looking op is really legal" decision to the
legalizer, and let the selector use the "underlying" vreg type only,
which would be guaranteed to map to a register class.
In any case, we eventually should mitigate:
- the performance impact by selecting no-op extract/truncates to COPYs
(which we currently do), and the COPYs to register reuses (which we
don't do yet).
- the compile-time impact by optimizing away extract/truncate sequences
in the legalizer.
llvm-svn: 292827
Summary:
Docs for clang::Decl and clang::TemplateSpecializationType have
not been generated since LLVM_ALIGNAS was added to them.
Tell Doxygen to expand LLVM_ALIGNAS to nothing as described at
https://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/manual/preprocessing.html
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, klimek, alexfh
Subscribers: ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28850
llvm-svn: 292483
Summary:
This change equips lit.py with two new options, --num-shards=M and
--run-shard=N (set by default from env vars LIT_NUM_SHARDS and LIT_RUN_SHARD).
The options must be used together, and N must be in 1..M.
Together these options effect only test selection: they partition the testsuite
into M equal-sized "shards", then select only the Nth shard. They can be used
in a cluster of test machines to achieve a very crude (static) form of
parallelism, with minimal configuration work.
Reviewers: modocache, ddunbar
Reviewed By: ddunbar
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28789
llvm-svn: 292417
Summary:
Previously there were three ways to inform the NVVMReflect pass whether
you wanted to flush denormals to zero:
* An LLVM command-line option
* Parameters to the NVVMReflect constructor
* Metadata on the module itself.
This change removes the first two, leaving only the third.
The motivation for this change, aside from simplifying things, is that
we want LLVM to be aware of whether it's operating in FTZ mode, so other
passes can use this information. Ideally we'd have a target-generic
piece of metadata on the module. This change moves us in that
direction.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28700
llvm-svn: 292068
Summary:
This string parameter is passed to -fuse-ld when linking. It can be
an absolute path to your custom linker, otherwise clang will look for
`ld.{name}`.
Reviewers: davide, tejohnson, pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28738
llvm-svn: 292047
Sanjoy Das