Add the necessary bits to CMakeLists to make it possible to configure
MLIR against installed LLVM, and build it with minimal need for LLVM
source tree. The latter is only necessary to run unittests, and if it
is missing then unittests are skipped with a warning.
This change includes the necessary changes to tests, in particular
adding some missing substitutions and defining missing variables
for lit.site.cfg.py substitution.
Reviewed By: stephenneuendorffer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85464
Co-authored-by: Isuru Fernando <isuruf@gmail.com>
* We've got significant missing features in order to use most of these effectively (i.e. custom builders, region-based builders).
* We presently also lack a mechanism for actually registering these dialects but they can be use with contexts that allow unregistered dialects for further prototyping.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94368
CHECK_* directives for message() where added in Cmake 3.17, LLVM
requires 3.14 as minimum so they may not be intepreted correctly and
just print "CHECK_*" into the message stream. Replace them with STATUS.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91959
* Makes `pip install pybind11` do the right thing with no further config.
* Since we now require a version of pybind11 greater than many LTS OS installs (>=2.6), a more convenient way to get a recent version is preferable.
* Also adds the version spec to find_package so it will skip older versions that may be lying around.
* Tested the full matrix of old system install, no system install, pip install and no pip install.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91903
In ODS, attributes of an operation can be provided as a part of the "arguments"
field, together with operands. Such attributes are accepted by the op builder
and have accessors generated.
Implement similar functionality for ODS-generated op-specific Python bindings:
the `__init__` method now accepts arguments together with operands, in the same
order as in the ODS `arguments` field; the instance properties are introduced
to OpView classes to access the attributes.
This initial implementation accepts and returns instances of the corresponding
attribute class, and not the underlying values since the mapping scheme of the
value types between C++, C and Python is not yet clear. Default-valued
attributes are not supported as that would require Python to be able to parse
C++ literals.
Since attributes in ODS are tightely related to the actual C++ type system,
provide a separate Tablegen file with the mapping between ODS storage type for
attributes (typically, the underlying C++ attribute class), and the
corresponding class name. So far, this might look unnecessary since all names
match exactly, but this is not necessarily the cases for non-standard,
out-of-tree attributes, which may also be placed in non-default namespaces or
Python modules. This also allows out-of-tree users to generate Python bindings
without having to modify the bindings generator itself. Storage type was
preferred over the Tablegen "def" of the attribute class because ODS
essentially encodes attribute _constraints_ rather than classes, e.g. there may
be many Tablegen "def"s in the ODS that correspond to the same attribute type
with additional constraints
The presence of the explicit mapping requires the change in the .td file
structure: instead of just calling the bindings generator directly on the main
ODS file of the dialect, it becomes necessary to create a new file that
includes the main ODS file of the dialect and provides the mapping for
attribute types. Arguably, this approach offers better separability of the
Python bindings in the build system as the main dialect no longer needs to know
that it is being processed by the bindings generator.
Reviewed By: stellaraccident
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91542
Introduce an ODS/Tablegen backend producing Op wrappers for Python bindings
based on the ODS operation definition. Usage:
mlir-tblgen -gen-python-op-bindings -Iinclude <path/to/Ops.td> \
-bind-dialect=<dialect-name>
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90960
We were discussing on discord regarding the need for extension-based systems like Python to dynamically link against MLIR (or else you can only have one extension that depends on it). Currently, when I set that up, I piggy-backed off of the flag that enables build libLLVM.so and libMLIR.so and depended on libMLIR.so from the python extension if shared library building was enabled. However, this is less than ideal.
In the current setup, libMLIR.so exports both all symbols from the C++ API and the C-API. The former is a kitchen sink and the latter is curated. We should be splitting them and for things that are properly factored to depend on the C-API, they should have the option to *only* depend on the C-API, and we should build that shared library no matter what. Its presence isn't just an optimization: it is a key part of the system.
To do this right, I needed to:
* Introduce visibility macros into mlir-c/Support.h. These should work on both *nix and windows as-is.
* Create a new libMLIRPublicAPI.so with just the mlir-c object files.
* Compile the C-API with -fvisibility=hidden.
* Conditionally depend on the libMLIR.so from libMLIRPublicAPI.so if building libMLIR.so (otherwise, also links against the static libs and will produce a mondo libMLIRPublicAPI.so).
* Disable re-exporting of static library symbols that come in as transitive deps.
This gives us a dynamic linked C-API layer that is minimal and should work as-is on all platforms. Since we don't support libMLIR.so building on Windows yet (and it is not very DLL friendly), this will fall back to a mondo build of libMLIRPublicAPI.so, which has its uses (it is also the most size conscious way to go if you happen to know exactly what you need).
Sizes (release/stripped, Ubuntu 20.04):
Shared library build:
libMLIRPublicAPI.so: 121Kb
_mlir.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: 1.4Mb
mlir-capi-ir-test: 135Kb
libMLIR.so: 21Mb
Static build:
libMLIRPublicAPI.so: 5.5Mb (since this is a "static" build, this includes the MLIR implementation as non-exported code).
_mlir.cpython-38-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: 1.4Mb
mlir-capi-ir-test: 44Kb
Things like npcomp and circt which bring their own dialects/transforms/etc would still need the shared library build and code that links against libMLIR.so (since it is all C++ interop stuff), but hopefully things that only depend on the public C-API can just have the one narrow dep.
I spot checked everything with nm, and it looks good in terms of what is exporting/importing from each layer.
I'm not in a hurry to land this, but if it is controversial, I'll probably split off the Support.h and API visibility macro changes, since we should set that pattern regardless.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini, benvanik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90824
The CMake macro refactoring had a hardcoded value left instead of using
the function argument.
Didn't catch it locally before because it required a clean build to
trigger.
Adds a TypeDef class to OpBase and backing generation code. Allows one
to define the Type, its parameters, and printer/parser methods in ODS.
Can generate the Type C++ class, accessors, storage class, per-parameter
custom allocators (for the storage constructor), and documentation.
Reviewed By: rriddle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86904
This reverts commit e9b87f43bd.
There are issues with macros generating macros without an obvious simple fix
so I'm going to revert this and try something different.
New projects (particularly out of tree) have a tendency to hijack the existing
llvm configuration options and build targets (add_llvm_library,
add_llvm_tool). This can lead to some confusion.
1) When querying a configuration variable, do we care about how LLVM was
configured, or how these options were configured for the out of tree project?
2) LLVM has lots of defaults, which are easy to miss
(e.g. LLVM_BUILD_TOOLS=ON). These options all need to be duplicated in the
CMakeLists.txt for the project.
In addition, with LLVM Incubators coming online, we need better ways for these
incubators to do things the "LLVM way" without alot of futzing. Ideally, this
would happen in a way that eases importing into the LLVM monorepo when
projects mature.
This patch creates some generic infrastructure in llvm/cmake/modules and
refactors MLIR to use this infrastructure. This should expand to include
add_xxx_library, which is by far the most complicated bit of building a
project correctly, since it has to deal with lots of shared library
configuration bits. (MLIR currently hijacks the LLVM infrastructure for
building libMLIR.so, so this needs to get refactored anyway.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85140
This changes mlir_check_link_libraries() to work with interface libraries.
These don't have the LINK_LIBRARIES property.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85957
Summary: * This library is special because of its dependencies so seems to have been inadvertently left out of installs.
Reviewers: antiagainst
Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes
Tags: #mlir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81693
Using LLVM components in LINK_LIBS means that the mechanisms for
replacing component dependencies with libLLVM.so break. Try to catch
this incorrect usage up front, instead of waiting until later when we
get difficult to understand runtime errors from incorrectly linked
libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80103
- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
In cmake, dependencies on generated files require some sophistication in the build system. At build time, files are parsed to determine which headers they depend on and these dependencies are injected into the build system. This works well with ninja, but has some constraints with the makefile generator. According to the cmake documentation, this only works reliably within the same directory.
This patch expands the usage of mlir-headers to include all generated headers and adds an mlir-generic-headers target which triggers generation of dialect-independent headers. These targets are used to express dependencies on generated headers. This is mostly handled in AddMLIR.cmake and only a few CMakeLists.txt files need to change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79242
Define MLIR_MAIN_INCLUDE_DIR, as it was not set anywhere.
Set MLIR_MAIN_SRC_DIR to the actual "source directory", and not the
"include directory" (as currently set).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77943
Previously, the tablegen() cmake command, which defines custom
commands for running tablegen, included several hardcoded paths. This
becomes unwieldy as there are more users for which these paths are
insufficient. For most targets, cmake uses include_directories() and
the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES directory property to specify include paths.
This change picks up the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES property and adds it
to the include path used when running tablegen. As a side effect, this
allows us to remove several hard coded paths to tablegen that are redundant
with specified include_directories().
I haven't removed the hardcoded path to CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR, which
seems generically useful. There are several users in clang which apparently
don't have the current directory as an include_directories(). This could
be considered separately.
The new version of this path uses list APPEND rather than list TRANSFORM,
in order to be compatible with cmake 3.4.3. If we update to cmake 3.12 then
we can use list TRANSFORM instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77156
Previously, the tablegen() cmake command, which defines custom
commands for running tablegen, included several hardcoded paths. This
becomes unwieldy as there are more users for which these paths are
insufficient. For most targets, cmake uses include_directories() and
the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES directory property to specify include paths.
This change picks up the INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES property and adds it
to the include path used when running tablegen. As a side effect, this
allows us to remove several hard coded paths to tablegen that are redundant
with specified include_directories().
I haven't removed the hardcoded path to CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR, which
seems generically useful. There are several users in clang which apparently
don't have the current directory as an include_directories(). This could
be considered separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77156
Summary:
This revisions performs several cleanups to the generated dialect documentation:
* Standardizes format of attributes/operands/results sections
* Splits out operation/type/dialect documentation generation to allow for composing generated and hand-written documentation
* Add section for declarative assembly syntax and successors
* General cleanup
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76573
Two MLIR examples do not link because the library path is different when using Xcode vs Makefiles.
This change adds the configuration name to the library path when building with Xcode.
i.e. LLVM_BUILD_DIR/debug/lib
Because MLIR_HAS_EXPORTS is not set, MLIRTarget.cmake is not delivered
to the install area. When this happens, the delivered MLIRConfig.cmake
should not reference it. Independently, we need to determine under what
conditions MLIR_HAS_EXPORTS should be set. Probably we are not exporting
all the libraries correctly.
LLVM has a documented mechanism for passing configuration information
to an out of tree project using cmake. See
https://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html#embedding-llvm-in-your-project. This
patch adds similar support for MLIR.
Using this requires something like:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.4.3)
project(SimpleProject)
find_package(MLIR REQUIRED CONFIG)
include_directories(${LLVM_INCLUDE_DIRS})
include_directories(${MLIR_INCLUDE_DIRS})
link_directories(${LLVM_BUILD_LIBRARY_DIR})
add_definitions(${LLVM_DEFINITIONS})
set(CMAKE_MODULE_PATH
${LLVM_CMAKE_DIR}
${MLIR_CMAKE_DIR}
)
include(AddLLVM)
include(TableGen)
include(AddMLIR)
add_executable(test-opt test-opt.cpp)
llvm_update_compile_flags(test-opt)
get_property(dialect_libs GLOBAL PROPERTY MLIR_DIALECT_LIBS)
get_property(conversion_libs GLOBAL PROPERTY MLIR_CONVERSION_LIBS)
message(dialects=${dialect_libs})
set(LIBS
${dialect_libs}
${conversion_libs}
MLIRLoopOpsTransforms
MLIRLoopAnalysis
MLIRAnalysis
MLIRDialect
MLIREDSC
MLIROptLib
MLIRParser
MLIRPass
MLIRQuantizerFxpMathConfig
MLIRQuantizerSupport
MLIRQuantizerTransforms
MLIRSPIRV
MLIRSPIRVTestPasses
MLIRSPIRVTransforms
MLIRTransforms
MLIRTransformUtils
MLIRTestDialect
MLIRTestIR
MLIRTestPass
MLIRTestTransforms
MLIRSupport
MLIRIR
MLIROptLib
LLVMSupport
LLVMCore
LLVMAsmParser
)
target_link_libraries(test-opt ${LIBS})
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76047
Summary: This generates the class declarations for dialects using the existing 'Dialect' tablegen classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76185
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
Collect a list of conversion libraries in cmake, so we don't have to
list these explicitly in most binaries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75222
Instead of creating extra libraries we don't really need, collect a
list of all dialects and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75221
Michał Górny