Using file(COPY FILE...) has several downsides. Since the file command
is only executed at configuration time, any changes to headers made
after the initial CMake execution are ignored. This can lead to subtle
errors since the just built Clang will be using stale libc++ headers.
Furthermore, since the headers are copied prior to executing the build
system, this may hide missing dependencies on libc++ from other LLVM
components.
This changes replaces the use of file(COPY FILE...) command with a
custom command and target which addresses all aforementioned issues and
matches the implementation already used by other LLVM components that
also install headers like Clang builtin headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44773
llvm-svn: 329544
Summary:
This change consolidates the always/never lists that may be provided to
clang to externally control which functions should be XRay instrumented
by imbuing attributes. The files follow the same format as defined in
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerSpecialCaseList.html for the
sanitizer blacklist.
We also deprecate the existing `-fxray-instrument-always=` and
`-fxray-instrument-never=` flags, in favour of `-fxray-attr-list=`.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR34721.
Reviewers: echristo, vlad.tsyrklevich, eugenis
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45357
llvm-svn: 329543
Summary:
Currently MachineLoopInfo is used in only two places:
1) for computing IsBasicBlockInsideInnermostLoop field of MCCodePaddingContext, and it is never used.
2) in emitBasicBlockLoopComments, which is called only if `isVerbose()` is true.
Despite that, we currently have a dependency on MachineLoopInfo, which makes
pass manager to compute it and MachineDominator Tree. This patch removes the
use (1) and makes the use (2) lazy, thus avoiding some redundant
recomputations.
Reviewers: opaparo, gadi.haber, rafael, craig.topper, zvi
Subscribers: rengolin, javed.absar, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44812
llvm-svn: 329542
Patch from Joe Loser.
Several unit tests meaning to test the behavior of lvalue insertion incorrectly
pass rvalues. Fixes bug PR # 27394
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D44411
llvm-svn: 329541
The TargetSchedModel is always initialized using the TargetSubtargetInfo's
MCSchedModel and TargetInstrInfo, so we don't need to extract those and
pass 3 parameters to init().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44789
llvm-svn: 329540
Summary:
Cmov and setcc previously used WriteALU, but on Intel processors at least they are more restricted than basic ALU ops.
This patch adds new SchedWrites for them and removes the InstRWs. I had to leave some InstRWs for CMOVA/CMOVBE and SETA/SETBE because those have an extra uop relative to the other condition codes on Intel CPUs.
The test changes are due to fixing a missing ZnAGU dependency on the memory form of setcc.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb, GGanesh
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: GGanesh, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45380
llvm-svn: 329539
Summary:
This removes the InstRWs for BLENDVPS/PD in favor of WriteFVarBlend. The latency listed was 3 cycles but WriteFVarBlend is defined as 1 cycle latency. The 1 cycle latency matches Agner Fog's data.
The patterns were missing the VEX forms which is why there are no test changes. We don't test "-mcpu=znver1 -mattr=-avx"
Reviewers: RKSimon, GGanesh
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44841
llvm-svn: 329538
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jordan_rose, bkramer
Reviewed By: bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45140
llvm-svn: 329536
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: hfinkel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44870
llvm-svn: 329535
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Note: This patch is one of a series of patches to replace *all* std::sort to llvm::sort.
Refer the comments section in D44363 for a list of all the required patches.
Reviewers: chandlerc, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: chandlerc, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44874
llvm-svn: 329534
Previously MapVector assumed `Map::mapped_type` was `unsigned`.
This caused problems when using MapVector with a user-specified
map where this didn't hold (For example StringMap<unsigned>).
This patch adjusts MapVector to use the same type as the underlying
map, avoiding reference binding errors in functions like `insert`.
llvm-svn: 329523
Explicitly link LLVMTestingSupport library against LLVMSupport. This
is necessary to fix linking errors when LLVMTestingSupport is built
as a shared library (with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON) and -Wl,-z,defs is used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45408
llvm-svn: 329522
Summary:
Currently clang doesn't do qualified lookup when building indirect field decl references. This causes ambiguity when the field is in a base class to which there are multiple valid paths even though a qualified name is used.
For example:
```
class B {
protected:
int i;
union { int j; };
};
class X : public B { };
class Y : public B { };
class Z : public X, public Y {
int a() { return X::i; } // works
int b() { return X::j; } // fails
};
```
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45411
llvm-svn: 329521
Summary:
Currently clang doesn't do qualified lookup when building indirect field decl references. This causes ambiguity when the field is in a base class to which there are multiple valid paths even though a qualified name is used.
For example:
```
class B {
protected:
int i;
union { int j; };
};
class X : public B { };
class Y : public B { };
class Z : public X, public Y {
int a() { return X::i; } // works
int b() { return X::j; } // fails
};
```
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45411
llvm-svn: 329519
Summary:
This patch cleans up a bunch of dead or unused code in BuildAnonymousStructUnionMemberReference.
The dead code was a branch that built a new CXXThisExpr when we weren't given a base object expression or base variable.
However, BuildAnonymousFoo has only two callers. One of which always builds a base object expression first, the second only calls when the IndirectFieldDecl is not a C++ class member. Even within C this branch seems entirely unused.
I tried diligently to write a test which hit it with no success.
This patch removes the branch and replaces it with an assertion that we were given either a base object expression or a base variable.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45410
llvm-svn: 329518
Summary:
Currently Clang fails to propagate qualifiers from the `CXXThisExpr` to the rebuilt `FieldDecl` for IndirectFieldDecls. For example:
```
template <class T> struct Foo {
struct { int x; };
int y;
void foo() const {
static_assert(__is_same(int const&, decltype((y))));
static_assert(__is_same(int const&, decltype((x)))); // assertion fails
}
};
template struct Foo<int>;
```
The fix is to delegate rebuilding of the MemberExpr to `BuildFieldReferenceExpr` which correctly propagates the qualifiers.
Reviewers: rsmith, lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman, bkramer, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45412
llvm-svn: 329517
In our real world application, we found the following optimization is missed in DAGCombiner
(zext (and/or/xor (shl/shr (load x), cst), cst)) -> (and/or/xor (shl/shr (zextload x), (zext cst)), (zext cst))
If the user of original zext is an add, it may enable further lea optimization on x86.
This patch add a new function CombineZExtLogicopShiftLoad to do this optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44402
llvm-svn: 329516
Summary:
clang_getFileName() may return a path relative to WorkingDir.
On Arch Linux, during clang_indexTranslationUnit(), clang_getFileName() on
CXIdxIncludedIncludedFileInfo::file may return
"/../lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.3.0/../../../../include/c++/7.3.0/string",
for `#include <string>`.
I presume WorkingDir is somehow changed to /usr/lib or /usr/include and
clang_getFileName() returns a path relative to WorkingDir.
clang_File_tryGetRealPathName() returns "/usr/include/c++/7.3.0/string"
which is more useful for the indexer in this case.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42893
llvm-svn: 329515
Summary:
1. Find GCC's LDPATH from the actual GCC config file.
2. Avoid picking libraries from a similar named tuple if the exact
tuple is installed.
Reviewers: mgorny, chandlerc, thakis, rnk
Reviewed By: mgorny, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45233
llvm-svn: 329512
Previously we used a custom lowering for this because of the AVX1 splitting requirement. But we can do the split during DAG combine if we check the types and subtarget
llvm-svn: 329510
Summary: Fixes the bots - I moved LLVMSetSubprogram into the DIBuilder bindings, so the Go bindings need to move as well.
Reviewers: whitequark
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45402
llvm-svn: 329505
There are a pair of folds that try to merge fneg into fsub
with an intervening cast, but as shown in the FIXME tests,
they can create extra instructions.
llvm-svn: 329501
There's an error for PSP4 platform only:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\VC\INCLUDE\algorithm(95):
error C2719: '_Pred': formal parameter with requested alignment of 8 won't be aligned
llvm-svn: 329495
Should fix UBSan bot by also checking there's no "uwtable" attribute
before skipping. Otherwise the unwind table will be useless since its
moves expect CSRs to actually be preserved.
A noreturn nounwind function can be expected to never return in any way, and by
never returning it will also never have to restore any callee-saved registers
for its caller. This makes it possible to skip spills of those registers during
function entry, saving some stack space and time in the process. This is rather
useful for embedded targets with limited stack space.
Should fix PR9970.
Patch mostly by myeisha (pmb).
llvm-svn: 329494
Summary:
This has just bit me, so i though it would be nice to avoid that next time :)
Motivational case:
https://godbolt.org/g/cq9UNk
Basically, it's likely to happen if you don't like shadowing issues,
and use `-Wshadow` and friends. And it won't be diagnosed by clang.
The reason is, these self-assign diagnostics only work for builtin assignment
operators. Which makes sense, one could have a very special operator=,
that does something unusual in case of self-assignment,
so it may make sense to not warn on that.
But while it may be intentional in some cases, it may be a bug in other cases,
so it would be really great to have some diagnostic about it...
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rtrieu, nikola, rjmccall, dblaikie
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: EricWF, lebedev.ri, thakis, Quuxplusone, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44883
llvm-svn: 329493
Petr Hosek