Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Richard Smith 24ad121582 Add -std=c++20 flag, replace C++2a with C++20 throughout the Clang
user interface and documentation, and update __cplusplus for C++20.

WG21 considers the C++20 standard to be finished (even though it still
has some more steps to pass through in the ISO process).

The old flag names are accepted for compatibility, as usual, and we
still have lots of references to C++2a in comments and identifiers;
those can be cleaned up separately.
2020-02-18 16:16:37 -08:00
Richard Smith ea366122d2 Rename -Wc++20-designator to -Wc++2a-designator for consistency and add
some test coverage for the flag.

llvm-svn: 370689
2019-09-02 23:27:54 +00:00
Richard Smith 34a38a3b54 Split -Wreorder into different warnings for reordering a constructor
mem-initializer list and for reordering a designated initializer list.

llvm-svn: 370688
2019-09-02 23:17:32 +00:00
Richard Smith 5030928d60 [c++20] Implement semantic restrictions for C++20 designated
initializers.

This has some interesting interactions with our existing extensions to
support C99 designated initializers as an extension in C++. Those are
resolved as follows:

 * We continue to permit the full breadth of C99 designated initializers
   in C++, with the exception that we disallow a partial overwrite of an
   initializer with a non-trivially-destructible type. (Full overwrite
   is OK, because we won't run the first initializer at all.)

 * The C99 extensions are disallowed in SFINAE contexts and during
   overload resolution, where they could change the meaning of valid
   programs.

 * C++20 disallows reordering of initializers. We only check for that for
   the simple cases that the C++20 rules permit (designators of the form
   '.field_name =' and continue to allow reordering in other cases).
   It would be nice to improve this behavior in future.

 * All C99 designated initializer extensions produce a warning by
   default in C++20 mode. People are going to learn the C++ rules based
   on what Clang diagnoses, so it's important we diagnose these properly
   by default.

 * In C++ <= 17, we apply the C++20 rules rather than the C99 rules, and
   so still diagnose C99 extensions as described above. We continue to
   accept designated C++20-compatible initializers in C++ <= 17 silently
   by default (but naturally still reject under -pedantic-errors).

This is not a complete implementation of P0329R4. In particular, that
paper introduces new non-C99-compatible syntax { .field { init } }, and
we do not support that yet.

This is based on a previous patch by Don Hinton, though I've made
substantial changes when addressing the above interactions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59754

llvm-svn: 370544
2019-08-30 22:52:55 +00:00
Richard Smith 79c88c3105 P1008R1 Classes with user-declared constructors are never aggregates in
C++20.

llvm-svn: 343131
2018-09-26 19:00:16 +00:00