There is a bug when initial exec is relaxed to local exec.
In the following situation:
InitExec.c
```
extern __thread unsigned TGlobal;
unsigned getConst(unsigned*);
unsigned addVal(unsigned, unsigned*);
unsigned GetAddrT() {
return addVal(getConst(&TGlobal), &TGlobal);
}
```
Def.c
```
__thread unsigned TGlobal;
unsigned getConst(unsigned* A) {
return *A + 3;
}
unsigned addVal(unsigned A, unsigned* B) {
return A + *B;
}
```
The problem is in InitExec.c but Def.c is required if you want to link the example and see the problem.
To compile everything:
```
clang -O3 -mcpu=pwr10 -c InitExec.c
clang -O3 -mcpu=pwr10 -c Def.c
ld.lld InitExec.o Def.o -o IeToLe
```
If you objdump the problem object file:
```
$ llvm-objdump -dr --mcpu=pwr10 InitExec.o
```
you will get the following assembly:
```
0000000000000000 <GetAddrT>:
0: a6 02 08 7c mflr 0
4: f0 ff c1 fb std 30, -16(1)
8: 10 00 01 f8 std 0, 16(1)
c: d1 ff 21 f8 stdu 1, -48(1)
10: 00 00 10 04 00 00 60 e4 pld 3, 0(0), 1
0000000000000010: R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL_PCREL34 TGlobal
18: 14 6a c3 7f add 30, 3, 13
0000000000000019: R_PPC64_TLS TGlobal
1c: 78 f3 c3 7f mr 3, 30
20: 01 00 00 48 bl 0x20
0000000000000020: R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC getConst
24: 78 f3 c4 7f mr 4, 30
28: 30 00 21 38 addi 1, 1, 48
2c: 10 00 01 e8 ld 0, 16(1)
30: f0 ff c1 eb ld 30, -16(1)
34: a6 03 08 7c mtlr 0
38: 00 00 00 48 b 0x38
0000000000000038: R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC addVal
```
The lines of interest are:
```
10: 00 00 10 04 00 00 60 e4 pld 3, 0(0), 1
0000000000000010: R_PPC64_GOT_TPREL_PCREL34 TGlobal
18: 14 6a c3 7f add 30, 3, 13
0000000000000019: R_PPC64_TLS TGlobal
1c: 78 f3 c3 7f mr 3, 30
```
Which once linked gets turned into:
```
10010210: ff ff 03 06 00 90 6d 38 paddi 3, 13, -28672, 0
10010218: 00 00 00 60 nop
1001021c: 78 f3 c3 7f mr 3, 30
```
The problem is that register 30 is never set after the optimization.
Therefore it is not correct to relax the above instructions by replacing
the add instruction with a nop.
Instead the add instruction should be replaced with a copy (mr) instruction.
If the add uses the same resgiter as input and as ouput then it is safe to
continue to replace the add with a nop.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95262
R_PPC64_ADDR16_HI represents bits 16-31 of a 32-bit value
R_PPC64_ADDR16_HIGH represents bits 16-31 of a 64-bit value.
In the Linux kernel, `LOAD_REG_IMMEDIATE_SYM` defined in `arch/powerpc/include/asm/ppc_asm.h`
uses @l, @high, @higher, @highest to load the 64-bit value of a symbol.
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1260
The scope of R_TLS (TP offset relocation types (TPREL/TPOFF) used for the
local-exec TLS model) is actually narrower than its name may imply. R_TLS_NEG
is only used by Solaris R_386_TLS_LE_32.
Rename them so that they will be less confusing.
Reviewed By: grimar, psmith, rprichard
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93467
With this change, `TargetInfo::adjustRelaxExpr` is only related to TLS
relaxations and a subsequent clean-up can delete the `data` parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92079
Add support to LLD for PC Relative Thread Local Storage for Local Dynamic.
This patch adds support for two relocations: R_PPC64_GOT_TLSLD_PCREL34 and
R_PPC64_DTPREL34.
The Local Dynamic code is:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsld@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSLD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsld) R_PPC64_TLSLD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
...
paddi r9, r3, x@dtprel R_PPC64_DTPREL34
```
After relaxation to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, 0x1000
nop
...
paddi r9, r3, x@dtprel R_PPC64_DTPREL34
```
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87504
Add Thread Local Storage support for the 34 bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 used in General Dynamic.
The compiler will produce code that looks like:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsgd@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
```
LLD should be able to correctly compute the relocation for R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 as well as do the following two relaxations where possible:
General Dynamic to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, x@tprel
nop
```
and General Dynamic to Initial Exec:
```
pld r3, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r3, r3, r13
```
Note:
This patch adds support for the PC Relative (no TOC) version of General Dynamic on top of the existing support for the TOC version of General Dynamic.
The ABI does not provide any way to tell by looking only at the relocation `R_PPC64_TLSGD` when it is being used in a TOC instruction sequence or and when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. The TOC sequence should always be 4 byte aligned. This patch adds one to the offset of the relocation when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. In this way LLD can tell by looking at the alignment of the offset of `R_PPC64_TLSGD` whether or not it is being used as part of a TOC or no TOC sequence.
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87318
Add Thread Local Storage support for the 34 bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 used in General Dynamic.
The compiler will produce code that looks like:
```
pla r3, x@got@tlsgd@pcrel R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34
bl __tls_get_addr@notoc(x@tlsgd) R_PPC64_TLSGD
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC
```
LLD should be able to correctly compute the relocation for R_PPC64_GOT_TLSGD_PCREL34 as well as do the following two relaxations where possible:
General Dynamic to Local Exec:
```
paddi r3, r13, x@tprel
nop
```
and General Dynamic to Initial Exec:
```
pld r3, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r3, r3, r13
```
Note:
This patch adds support for the PC Relative (no TOC) version of General Dynamic on top of the existing support for the TOC version of General Dynamic.
The ABI does not provide any way to tell by looking only at the relocation `R_PPC64_TLSGD` when it is being used in a TOC instruction sequence or and when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. The TOC sequence should always be 4 byte aligned. This patch adds one to the offset of the relocation when it is being used in a no TOC sequence. In this way LLD can tell by looking at the alignment of the offset of `R_PPC64_TLSGD` whether or not it is being used as part of a TOC or no TOC sequence.
Reviewed By: NeHuang, sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87318
Add Thread Local Storage Initial Exec support to LLD.
This patch adds the computation for the relocations as well as the relaxation from Initial Exec to Local Exec.
Initial Exec:
```
pld r9, x@got@tprel@pcrel
add r9, r9, x@tls@pcrel
```
or
```
pld r9, x@got@tprel@pcrel
lbzx r10, r9, x@tls@pcrel
```
Note that @tls@pcrel is actually encoded as R_PPC64_TLS with a one byte displacement.
For the above examples relaxing Intitial Exec to Local Exec:
```
paddi r9, r9, x@tprel
nop
```
or
```
paddi r9, r13, x@tprel
lbz r10, 0(r9)
```
Reviewed By: nemanjai, MaskRay, #powerpc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86893
Add Thread Local Storage Local Exec support to LLD. This is to support PC Relative addressing of Local Exec.
The patch teaches LLD to handle:
```
paddi r9, r13, x1@tprel
```
The relocation is:
```
R_PPC_TPREL34
```
Reviewed By: NeHuang, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86608
`ELFFile<ELFT>` has many methods that take pointers,
though they assume that arguments are never null and
hence could take references instead.
This patch performs such clean-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87385
This patch implements the handling for the R_PPC64_PCREL_OPT relocation as well
as the GOT relocation for the associated R_PPC64_GOT_PCREL34 relocation.
On Power10 targets with PC-Relative addressing, the linker can relax
GOT-relative accesses to PC-Relative under some conditions. Since the sequence
consists of a prefixed load, followed by a non-prefixed access (load or store),
the linker needs to replace the first instruction (as the replacement
instruction will be prefixed). The compiler communicates to the linker that
this optimization is safe by placing the two aforementioned relocations on the
GOT load (of the address).
The linker then does two things:
- Convert the load from the got into a PC-Relative add to compute the address
relative to the PC
- Find the instruction referred to by the second relocation (R_PPC64_PCREL_OPT)
and replace the first with the PC-Relative version of it
It is important to synchronize the mapping from legacy memory instructions to
their PC-Relative form. Hence, this patch adds a file to be included by both
the compiler and the linker so they're always in agreement.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84360
This patch supports the situation where caller does not have a valid TOC and
calls using the R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC relocation and the callee is not DSO local.
In this case the call cannot be made directly since the callee may or may not
require a valid TOC pointer. As a result this situation require a PC-relative
plt stub to set up r12.
Reviewed By: sfertile, MaskRay, stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83669
The PC Relative code now allows for calls that are marked with the relocation
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC. This indicates that the caller does not have a valid TOC
pointer in R2 and does not require R2 to be restored after the call.
This patch is added to support local calls to callees that require a TOC
Reviewed By: sfertile, MaskRay, nemanjai, stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83504
The PC Relative code allows for calls that are marked with the relocation
R_PPC64_REL24_NOTOC. This indicates that the caller does not have a valid TOC
pointer in R2 and does not require R2 to be restored after the call.
This patch is added to support local calls to callees tha also do not have a TOC.
Reviewed By: sfertile, MaskRay, stefanp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82816
The R_PPC64_REL24 is used in function calls when the caller requires a
valid TOC pointer. If the callee shares the same TOC or does not clobber
the TOC pointer then a direct call can be made. If the callee does not
share the TOC a thunk must be added to save the TOC pointer for the caller.
Up until PC Relative was introduced all local calls on medium and large code
models were assumed to share a TOC. This is no longer the case because
if the caller requires a TOC and the callee is PC Relative then the callee
can clobber the TOC even if it is in the same DSO.
This patch is to add support for a TOC caller calling a PC Relative callee that
clobbers the TOC.
Reviewed By: sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82950
Add support for the 34bit relocation R_PPC64_GOT_PCREL34 for
PC Relative in LLD.
Reviewers: sfertile, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81948
In the 64-bit ELF V2 API Specification: Power Architecture, 2.3.3.1. GPR
Save and Restore Functions defines some special functions which may be
referenced by GCC produced assembly (LLVM does not reference them).
With GCC -Os, when the number of call-saved registers exceeds a certain
threshold, GCC generates `_savegpr0_* _restgpr0_*` calls and expects the
linker to define them. See
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2002-February/017444.html and
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2004-August/036765.html . This
is weird because libgcc.a would be the natural place. However, the linker
generation approach has the advantage that the linker can generate
multiple copies to avoid long branch thunks. We don't consider the
advantage significant enough to complicate our trunk implementation, so
we take a simple approach.
* Check whether `_savegpr0_{14..31}` are used
* If yes, define needed symbols and add an InputSection with the code sequence.
`_savegpr1_*` `_restgpr0_*` and `_restgpr1_*` are similar.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79977
Symbol information can be used to improve out-of-range/misalignment diagnostics.
It also helps R_ARM_CALL/R_ARM_THM_CALL which has different behaviors with different symbol types.
There are many (67) relocateOne() call sites used in thunks, {Arm,AArch64}errata, PLT, etc.
Rename them to `relocateNoSym()` to be clearer that there is no symbol information.
Reviewed By: grimar, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73254
These functions call relocateOne(). This patch is a prerequisite for
making relocateOne() aware of `Symbol` (D73254).
Reviewed By: grimar, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73250
Non-preemptible IFUNC are placed in in.iplt (.glink on EM_PPC64). If
there is a non-GOT non-PLT relocation, for pointer equality, we change
the type of the symbol from STT_IFUNC and STT_FUNC and bind it to the
.glink entry.
On EM_386, EM_X86_64, EM_ARM, and EM_AARCH64, the PLT code sequence
loads the address from its associated .got.plt slot. An IPLT also has an
associated .got.plt slot and can use the same code sequence.
On EM_PPC64, the PLT code sequence is actually a bl instruction in
.glink . It jumps to `__glink_PLTresolve` (the PLT header). and
`__glink_PLTresolve` computes the .plt slot (relocated by
R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT).
An IPLT does not have an associated R_PPC64_JUMP_SLOT, so we cannot use
`bl` in .iplt . Instead, create a call stub which has a similar code
sequence as PPC64PltCallStub. We don't save the TOC pointer, so such
scenarios will not work: a function pointer to a non-preemptible ifunc,
which resolves to a function defined in another DSO. This is the
restriction described by https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/GNU_IFUNC
(though on many architectures it works in practice):
Requirement (a): Resolver must be defined in the same translation unit as the implementations.
If an ifunc is taken address but not called, technically we don't need
an entry for it, but we currently do that.
This patch makes
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fno-pie -no-pie a.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fPIE -pie a.c
#include <stdio.h>
static void impl(void) { puts("meow"); }
void thefunc(void) __attribute__((ifunc("resolver")));
void *resolver(void) { return &impl; }
int main(void) {
thefunc();
void (*theptr)(void) = &thefunc;
theptr();
}
work on Linux glibc and FreeBSD. Calling a function pointer pointing to
a Non-preemptible IFUNC never worked before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71509
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
This change only affects EM_386. relOff can be computed from `index`
easily, so it is unnecessarily passed as a parameter.
Both in.plt and in.iplt entries are written by writePLT. For in.iplt,
the instruction `push reloc_offset` will change because `index` is now
different. Fortunately, this does not matter because `push; jmp` is only
used by PLT. IPLT does not need the code sequence.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71518
Fixes PPC64 part of PR40438
// clang -target ppc64le -c a.cc
// .text.unlikely may be placed in a separate output section (via -z keep-text-section-prefix)
// The distance between bar in .text.unlikely and foo in .text may be larger than 32MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.unlikely"))) static int bar() { foo(); return 0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for PPC64.
AArch64: .text -> `__AArch64ADRPThunk_ (adrp x16, ...; add x16, x16, ...; br x16)` -> target
PPC64: .text -> `__long_branch_ (addis 12, 2, ...; ld 12, ...(12); mtctr 12; bctr)` -> target
AArch64 can leverage ADRP to jump to the target directly, but PPC64
needs to load an address from .branch_lt . Before Power ISA v3.0, the
PC-relative ADDPCIS was not available. .branch_lt was invented to work
around the limitation.
Symbol::ppc64BranchltIndex is replaced by
PPC64LongBranchTargetSection::entry_index which take addends into
consideration.
The tests are rewritten: ppc64-long-branch.s tests -no-pie and
ppc64-long-branch-pi.s tests -pie and -shared.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70937
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/640
R_PPC64_REL16_HI was incorrectly computed as an R_ABS relocation.
rLLD368964 made it a linker failure. Change it to use R_PC to fix the
failures.
Add ppc64-reloc-rel.s for these R_PPC64_REL* tests.
llvm-svn: 369184
Currently the following 3 relocation types do not trigger the creation
of a canonical PLT (which changes STT_GNU_IFUNC to STT_FUNC and
redirects all references):
1) GOT-generating (`needsGot`)
2) PLT-generating (`needsPlt`)
3) R_ABS with 0 addend in a writable location. This is used for
for ifunc function pointers in writable sections such as .data and .toc.
This patch deletes case 3) to simplify the R_*_IRELATIVE generating
logic added in D57371. Other advantages:
* It is guaranteed no more than 1 R_*_IRELATIVE is created for an ifunc.
* PPC64: no need to special case ifunc in toc-indirect to toc-relative relaxation. See D65755
The deleted elf::addIRelativeRelocs demonstrates that one-pass scan
through relocations makes several optimizations difficult. This is
something we can think about in the future.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65995
llvm-svn: 368661
Fixes PR42759.
```
// If ifunc is taken address in -fPIC code, it may have a toc entry
.section .toc,"aw",@progbits
.quad ifunc
// ifunc may be defined as STT_GNU_IFUNC in another object file
.type ifunc, %gnu_indirect_function
```
If ifunc is non-preemptable (e.g. when linking an executable), the toc
entry will be relocated by R_PPC64_IRELATIVE.
R_*_IRELATIVE represents the symbolic value of a
non-preemptable ifunc (not associated with a canonical PLT) in a writable location. It has an unknown value at
link time, so we cannot apply toc-indirect to toc-relative relaxation.
Reviewed By: luporl, sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65755
llvm-svn: 368057
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
Similar to R_AARCH64_ABS32, R_PPC64_ADDR32 can represent either a signed
value or unsigned value, thus we should use `[-2**(n-1), 2**n)` instead of
`[-2**(n-1), 2**(n-1))` to check overflows.
The issue manifests as a bogus linker error when linking the powerpc64le Linux kernel.
The new behavior is compatible with ld.bfd's complain_overflow_bitfield.
The upper bound of the error message is not correct. Fix it as well.
The changes to R_PPC_ADDR16, R_PPC64_ADDR16, R_X86_64_8 and R_X86_64_16 are similar.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63690
llvm-svn: 364164
Summary:
Our rule to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types were
loose. D63121 made it stricter but it failed to create R_*_RELATIVE for
R_ARM_TARGET1 and R_PPC64_TOC. rLLD363236 worked around that by
reinstating the original behavior for ARM and PPC64.
This patch is an attempt to simplify the logic.
Note, in ld.bfd, R_ARM_TARGET2 --target2=abs also creates
R_ARM_RELATIVE. This seems a very uncommon scenario (moreover,
--target2=got-rel is the default), so I do not implement any logic
related to it.
Also, delete R_AARCH64_ABS32 from AArch64::getDynRel. We don't have
working ILP32 support yet. Allowing it would create an incorrect
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE.
For MIPS, the (if SymbolRel, then RelativeRel) code is to keep its
behavior unchanged.
Note, in ppc64-abs64-dyn.s, R_PPC64_TOC gets an incorrect addend because
computeAddend() doesn't compute the correct address. We seem to have the
wrong behavior for a long time. The important thing seems that a dynamic
relocation R_PPC64_TOC should not be created as the dynamic loader will
error R_PPC64_TOC is not supported.
Reviewers: atanasyan, grimar, peter.smith, ruiu, sfertile, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63383
llvm-svn: 363928
This reverts commit r363060 and restores r362867.
r362867 is innocent. The ppc64le-lld-multistage-test bot failure was due to a clang/gcc .toc bug:
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .rodata._ZNK4llvm3MVT13getSizeInBitsEv
>>> defined in utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o
>>> referenced by CodeGenRegisters.cpp
>>> utils/TableGen/CMakeFiles/llvm-tblgen.dir/CodeGenRegisters.cpp.o:(.toc+0x0)
It will be worked around by D63182.
llvm-svn: 363124
The current rule is loose: `!Sym.IsPreemptible || Expr == R_GOT`.
When the symbol is non-preemptable, this allows absolute relocation
types with smaller numbers of bits, e.g. R_X86_64_{8,16,32}. They are
disallowed by ld.bfd and gold, e.g.
ld.bfd: a.o: relocation R_X86_64_8 against `.text' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This patch:
a) Add TargetInfo::SymbolicRel to represent relocation types that resolve to a
symbol value (e.g. R_AARCH_ABS64, R_386_32, R_X86_64_64).
As a side benefit, we currently (ab)use GotRel (R_*_GLOB_DAT) to resolve
GOT slots that are link-time constants. Since we now use Target->SymbolRel
to do the job, we can remove R_*_GLOB_DAT from relocateOne() for all targets.
R_*_GLOB_DAT cannot be used as static relocation types.
b) Change the condition to `!Sym.IsPreemptible && Type != Target->SymbolicRel || Expr == R_GOT`.
Some tests are caught by the improved error checking (ld.bfd/gold also
issue errors on them). Many misuse .long where .quad should be used
instead.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63121
llvm-svn: 363059
I've change the variable names used in PPC64.cpp from "Instr" to "Insn"
because "Insn" is a more common abbreviation for "instruction".
While changing PPC64.cpp relocateOne(), make R_PPC64_ADDR16_LO{_DS}
slightly more efficient by saving a read and a write for the TocOptimize
case.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63043
llvm-svn: 362867
Stefan Pintilie