Summary:
This change adds support for specifying a weight when merging profile data with the llvm-profdata tool.
Weights are specified by using the --weighted-input=<weight>,<filename> option. Input files not specified
with this option (normal positional list after options) are given a default weight of 1.
Adding support for arbitrary weighting of input profile data allows for relative importance to be placed on the
input data from multiple training runs.
Both sampled and instrumented profiles are supported.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, bogner, silvas
Subscribers: silvas, davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15306
llvm-svn: 255659
This patch adds the missing functionality in parsable
text format support for value profiling.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15212
llvm-svn: 255523
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 253009
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 252916
In some places we've been using different suffixes for the different
file formats involved in instrprof, but in others we've just
ambiguously used .profdata. Update the test files to indicate the
types of file more obviously.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 214357
This moves some tests around to make it clearer what's being tested,
and adds very rudimentary comment syntax to the text input format to
make specifying this kind of test a little bit simpler.
llvm-svn: 214235
Nathan Slingerland