I have disabled some attribute subject lines on purpose in Attr.td;
this part is a WIP with the goal being to restore those subjects
incrementally. By commenting them out, it leaves the original behavior
the same as before for those attributes and so those are not
functionality changes.
llvm-svn: 195841
look at the attribute spelling instead. The 'ownership_*' attributes should
probably be split into separate *Attr classes, but that's more than I wanted to
do here.
llvm-svn: 195805
which we don't think can't have one, only allow it in the tiny number of
attributes which opts into this weird parse rule.
I've manually checked that the handlers for all these attributes can in fact
cope with an identifier as the argument. This is still somewhat terrible; we
should move more fully towards picking the parsing rules based on the
attribute, and make the Parse -> Sema interface more type-safe.
llvm-svn: 193295
that a function can be called in. This reduced the total number of annotations
needed and makes writing more complicated behaviour less burdensome.
Patch by chriswails@gmail.com.
llvm-svn: 191983
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180973
This change partly addresses a heinous problem we have with the
parsing of attribute arguments that are a lone identifier. Previously,
we would end up parsing the 'align' attribute of this as an expression
"(Align)":
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align((Align)))) char storage[Size];
};
while this would parse as a "parameter name" 'Align':
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align(Align))) char storage[Size];
};
The code that handles the alignment attribute would completely ignore
the parameter name, so the while the first of these would do what's
expected, the second would silently be equivalent to
template<unsigned Size, unsigned Align>
class my_aligned_storage
{
__attribute__((align)) char storage[Size];
};
i.e., use the maximal alignment rather than the specified alignment.
Address this by sniffing the "Args" provided in the TableGen
description of attributes. If the first argument is "obviously"
something that should be treated as an expression (rather than an
identifier to be matched later), parse it as an expression.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13700933>.
llvm-svn: 180970
Required making a handful of changes to the table generator. Also adds
an unspecified inheritance attribute. This opens the path for us to
apply these attributes to C++ records implicitly.
llvm-svn: 178054
Remove "IsMSDeclspec" argument from Align attribute since the arguments in Attr.td should
only model those appear in source code. Introduce attribute Accessor, and teach TableGen
to generate syntax kind accessors for Align attribute, and use those accessors to decide
if an alignment attribute is a declspec attribute.
llvm-svn: 174133
Indents were given the color blue when outputting with color.
AST dumping now looks like this:
Node
|-Node
| `-Node
`-Node
`-Node
Compared to the previous:
(Node
(Node
(Node))
(Node
(Node)))
llvm-svn: 174022
as a keyword. Rationalize existing attributes to use it as appropriate, and to
not lie about some __declspec attributes being GNU attributes. In passing,
remove a gross hack which was discarding attributes which we could handle. This
results in us actually respecting the __pascal keyword again.
llvm-svn: 173746
Introduce a spelling index to Attr class, which is an index into the attribute spelling list of an attribute defined in Attr.td.
This index will determine the actual spelling used by an attribute, as it incorporates both the syntax and naming of the attribute.
When constructing an attribute AST node, the spelling index is computed based on attribute kind, scope (if it's a C++11 attribute), and
name, then passed to Attr that will use the index to print itself.
Thanks to Richard Smith for the idea and review.
llvm-svn: 173358
not ReadExpr().
Also add a test case making sure the thread safety attributes work as expected
when they come from a PCH.
Fixes rdar://12584141 & http://llvm.org/PR13982
llvm-svn: 168017
The original r158700 caused crashes in the gcc test suite,
g++.abi/vtable3a.C among others. It also caused failures in the libc++
test suite.
llvm-svn: 158749
Note that this is mostly a structural patch that handles the change from the old
spelling style to the new one. One consequence of this is that all AT_foo_bar
enum values have changed to not be based off of the first spelling, but rather
off of the class name, so they are now AT_FooBar and the like (a straw poll on
IRC showed support for this). Apologies for code churn.
Most attributes have GNU spellings as a temporary solution until everything else
is sorted out (such as a Keyword spelling, which I intend to add if someone else
doesn't beat me to it). This is definitely a WIP.
I've also killed BaseCheckAttr since it was unused, and I had to go through
every attribute anyway.
llvm-svn: 158700
Now, as long as the 'Namespaces' variable is correct inside Attr.td, the
generated code will correctly admit a C++11 attribute only when it has the
appropriate namespace(s).
llvm-svn: 158661
* Don't copy the visibility attribute during instantiations. We have to be able
to distinguish
struct HIDDEN foo {};
template<class T>
DEFAULT void bar() {}
template DEFAULT void bar<foo>();
from
struct HIDDEN foo {};
template<class T>
DEFAULT void bar() {}
template void bar<foo>();
* If an instantiation has an attribute, it takes precedence over an attribute
in the template.
* With instantiation attributes handled with the above logic, we can now
select the minimum visibility when looking at template arguments.
llvm-svn: 156821
TableGen-generated StringMatcher, for a 1.2% speedup in -fparse-only
time in <rdar://problem/11004361>. Thanks to Benjamin for pointing me
at StringMatcher!
llvm-svn: 156003
This submission improves Clang sema handling by using Clang tablegen
to generate common boilerplate code. As a start, it implements AttributeList
enumerator generation and case statements for AttributeList::getKind.
A new field "SemaHandler" is introduced in Attr.td and by default set to 1
as most of attributes in Attr.td have semantic checking in Sema. For a small
number of attributes that don't appear in Sema, the value is set to 0.
Also there are a small number of attributes that only appear in Sema but not
in Attr.td. Currently these attributes are still hardcoded in Sema AttributeList.
Reviewed by Delesley Hutchins.
llvm-svn: 152169
- Remodel Expr::EvaluateAsInt to behave like the other EvaluateAs* functions,
and add Expr::EvaluateKnownConstInt to capture the current fold-or-assert
behaviour.
- Factor out evaluation of bitfield bit widths.
- Fix a few places which would evaluate an expression twice: once to determine
whether it is a constant expression, then again to get the value.
llvm-svn: 141561
Aaron Ballman