This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
This commit adds a node handle type, (located in __node_handle), and adds
extract() and insert() members to all map and set types, as well as their
implementations in __tree and __hash_table.
The second half of this feature is adding merge() members, which splice nodes
in bulk from one container into another. This will be committed in a follow-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46845
llvm-svn: 338472
These containers type-punned between pair<K, V> and pair<const K, V> as an
optimization. This commit instead provides access to the pair via a pair of
references that assign through to the underlying object. It's still undefined to
mutate a const object, but clang doesn't optimize on this for data members, so
this should be safe.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47607
llvm-svn: 333948
Patch from ngolovliov@gmail.com
Reviewed as: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42344
As described in llvm.org/PR30959, the current
implementation of std::{map, key}::{count, equal_range} in libcxx is
non-conforming. Quoting the C++14 standard [associative.reqmts]p3
> The phrase “equivalence of keys” means the equivalence relation imposed by
> the comparison and not the operator== on keys. That is, two keys k1 and k2 are
> considered to be equivalent if for the comparison object comp,
> comp(k1, k2) == false && comp(k2, k1) == false.
In the same section, the requirements table states the following:
> a.equal_range(k) equivalent to make_pair(a.lower_bound(k), a.upper_bound(k))
> a.count(k) returns the number of elements with key equivalent to k
The behaviour of libstdc++ seems to conform to the standard here.
llvm-svn: 324799
r300140 introduced a bunch of failures by changing the internal
interface provided by __compressed_pair. This patch fixes all of
the failures caused by the new interface by changing the existing
code to use it.
In addition to those changes this patch also fixes two separate
issues causing test failures:
1) Fix the member swap definition for __map_value_compare. Previously
the swap was incorrectly configured to swap the comparator as const.
2) Fix an assertion failure in futures.task.members/ctor_func_alloc.pass.cpp
that incorrectly expected a move to take place when a single copy is sufficient.
There is one remaining failure regarding make_shared. I'll commit a fix for that
shortly.
llvm-svn: 300148
Clang recently added a `diagnose_if(cond, msg, type)` attribute
which can be used to generate diagnostics when `cond` is a constant
expression that evaluates to true. Otherwise no attribute has no
effect.
This patch adds _LIBCPP_DIAGNOSE_ERROR/WARNING macros which
use this new attribute. Additionally this patch implements
a diagnostic message when a non-const-callable comparator is
given to a container.
Note: For now the warning version of the diagnostic is useless
within libc++ since warning diagnostics are suppressed by the
system header pragma. I'm going to work on fixing this.
llvm-svn: 291961
Summary:
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR31402 by replacing `map::__find_equal_key` with `__tree::__find_equal`, which has already addressed the same undefined behavior.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to write a test case which causes the UBSAN diagnostic mentioned in the bug report. I can write tests which exercise the UB but for some reason they do not cause UBSAN to fail. Any help writing a test case would be appreciated.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, vsk, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28131
llvm-svn: 291087
The name _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY is no longer accurate because both
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS and _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY expand to
__attribute__((__type_visibility__)) with Clang. The only remaining difference
is that _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY can be applied to templates whereas
_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS cannot (due to dllimport/dllexport not being allowed on
templates).
This patch renames _LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS_ONLY to _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS.
llvm-svn: 291035
map's allocator may only be used to construct objects of 'value_type',
or in this case 'pair<const Key, Value>'. In order to respect this requirement
in operator[], which requires default constructing the 'mapped_type', we have
to use pair's piecewise constructor with '(tuple<Kep>, tuple<>)'.
Unfortunately we still need to provide a fallback implementation for C++03
since we don't have <tuple>. Even worse this fallback is the last remaining
user of '__hash_map_node_destructor' and '__construct_node_with_key'.
This patch also switches try_emplace over to __tree.__emplace_unique_key_args.
llvm-svn: 264989
This patch is fairly large and contains a number of changes. The changes all work towards
allowing __tree to properly handle __value_type esspecially when inserting into the __tree.
I chose not to break this change into smaller patches because it wouldn't be possible to
write meaningful standard-compliant tests for each patch.
It is very similar to r260513 "[libcxx] Teach __hash_table how to handle unordered_map's __hash_value_type".
Changes in <map>
* Remove __value_type's constructors because it should never be constructed directly.
* Make map::emplace and multimap::emplace forward to __tree and remove the old definitions
* Remove "__construct_node" map and multimap member functions. Almost all of the construction is done within __tree.
* Fix map's move constructor to access "__value_type.__nc" directly and pass this object to __tree::insert.
Changes in <__tree>
* Add traits to detect, handle, and unwrap, map's "__value_type".
* Convert methods taking "value_type" to take "__container_value_type" instead. Previously these methods caused
unwanted implicit conversions from "std::pair<Key, Value>" to "__value_type<Key, Value>".
* Delete __tree_node and __tree_node_base's constructors and assignment operators. The node types should never be constructed
because the "__value_" member of __tree_node must be constructed directly by the allocator.
* Make the __tree_node_destructor class and "__construct_node" methods unwrap "__node_value_type" into "__container_value_type" before invoking the allocator. The user's allocator can only be used to construct and destroy the container's value_type. Passing it map's "__value_type" was incorrect.
* Cleanup the "__insert" and "__emplace" methods. Have __insert forward to an __emplace function wherever possible to reduce
code duplication. __insert_unique(value_type const&) and __insert_unique(value_type&&) forward to __emplace_unique_key_args.
These functions will not allocate a new node if the value is already in the tree.
* Change the __find* functions to take the "key_type" directly instead of passing in "value_type" and unwrapping the key later.
This change allows the find functions to be used without having to construct a "value_type" first. This allows for a number
of optimizations.
* Teach __move_assign and __assign_multi methods to unwrap map's __value_type.
llvm-svn: 264986
The "const" pointer typedefs such as "__node_const_pointer" and
"__node_base_const_pointer" are identical to their non-const pointer types.
This patch changes all usages of "const" pointer type names to their respective
non-const typedef.
Since "fancy pointers to const" cannot be converted back to a non-const pointer
type according to the allocator requirements it is important that we never
actually use "const" pointers.
Furthermore since "__node_const_pointer" and "__node_pointer" already
name the same type, it's very confusing to use both names. Especially
when defining const/non-const overloads for member functions.
llvm-svn: 261419
This patch is very similar to r260431.
This patch is the first in a series of patches that's meant to better
support map. map has a special "value_type" that
differs from pair<const Key, Value>. In order to meet the EmplaceConstructible
and CopyInsertable requirements we need to teach __tree about this
special value_type.
This patch creates a "__tree_node_types" traits class that contains
all of the typedefs needed by the associative containers and their iterators.
These typedefs include ones for each node type and node pointer type,
as well as special typedefs for "map"'s value type.
Although the associative containers already supported incomplete types, this
patch makes it official by adding tests.
This patch will be followed up shortly with various cleanups within __tree and
fixes for various map bugs and problems.
llvm-svn: 261416
Summary:
Throughout the libc++ headers, there are a few instances where
_VSTD::move() is used to return a local variable. Howard commented in
r189039 that these were there "for non-obvious reasons such as to help
things limp along in C++03 language mode".
However, when compiling these headers with warnings on, and in C++11 or
higher mode (like we do in FreeBSD), they cause the following complaints
about pessimizing moves:
In file included from tests.cpp:26:
In file included from tests.hpp:29:
/usr/include/c++/v1/map:1368:12: error: moving a local object in a return statement prevents copy elision [-Werror,-Wpessimizing-move]
return _VSTD::move(__h); // explicitly moved for C++03
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/__config:368:15: note: expanded from macro '_VSTD'
#define _VSTD std::_LIBCPP_NAMESPACE
^
Attempt to fix this by adding a _LIBCPP_EXPLICIT_MOVE() macro to
__config, which gets defined to _VSTD::move for pre-C++11, and to
nothing for C++11 and later.
I am not completely satisfied with the macro name (I also considered
_LIBCPP_COMPAT_MOVE and some other variants), so suggestions are
welcome. :)
Reviewers: mclow.lists, howard.hinnant, EricWF
Subscribers: arthur.j.odwyer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11394
llvm-svn: 245421
Summary: Currently we only enable the use of __is_final(...) with Clang. GCC also provides __is_final(...) since 4.7 in all standard modes. This patch creates the macro _LIBCPP_HAS_IS_FINAL to note the availability of `__is_final`.
Reviewers: danalbert, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8795
llvm-svn: 239664