When indirect field is initialized with another field, you have
MemberExpr with CXXThisExpr that corresponds to the field's immediate
anonymous parent. But 'this' was referring to the non-anonymous parent.
So when we were building LValue Designator, it was incorrect as it had
wrong starting point. Usage of such designator would cause unexpected
APValue changes and crashes.
The fix is in adjusting 'this' for indirect fields from non-anonymous
parent to the field's immediate parent.
Discovered by OSS-Fuzz:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=4985
rdar://problem/36359187
Reviewers: rsmith, efriedma
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jkorous-apple
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42498
llvm-svn: 325997
The tests that failed on a windows host have been fixed.
Original message:
Start setting dso_local for COFF.
With this there are still some GVs where we don't set dso_local
because setGVProperties is never called. I intend to fix that in
followup commits. This is just the bare minimum to teach
shouldAssumeDSOLocal what it should do for COFF.
llvm-svn: 325940
expressions, if their lifetime began during the evaluation of the expression.
This is technically not allowed in C++11, though we could consider permitting
it there too, as an extension.
llvm-svn: 325663
Reimplement the "noexcept function actually throws" warning to properly handle
nested try-blocks. In passing, change 'throw;' handling to treat any enclosing
try block as being sufficient to suppress the warning rather than requiring a
'catch (...)'; the warning is intended to be conservatively-correct.
llvm-svn: 325545
There were a few issues previously with the target
attribute diagnostics implementation that lead to the
attribute being added to the AST despite having an error
in it.
This patch changes that, and adds a test to ensure it
does not get added to the AST.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43359
llvm-svn: 325364
Summary:
Fix a test failure on ARM hosts that was caused by a difference in the type of
size_t, by using a target-agnostic definiton.
Test Plan:
```
clang -cc1 -internal-isystem build/lib/clang/7.0.0/include -nostdsysteminc \
-std=c++14 -fcoroutines-ts -verify clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp \
-fcxx-exceptions -fexceptions \
-triple armeb-none-eabi
```
llvm-svn: 325342
This broke the Chromium build, see https://crbug.com/813017
> accessibility of a class member.
>
> This fixes PR32898.
>
> rdar://problem/33737747
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36918
llvm-svn: 325335
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D42605.
An implementation of the behavior described in `[dcl.fct.def.coroutine]/7`:
when a promise type overloads `operator new` using a "placement new"
that takes the same argument types as the coroutine function, that
overload is used when allocating the coroutine frame.
Simply passing references to the coroutine function parameters directly
to `operator new` results in invariant violations in LLVM's coroutine
splitting pass, so this implementation modifies Clang codegen to
produce allocator-specific alloc/store/loads for each parameter being
forwarded to the allocator.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: lewissbaker, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42606
llvm-svn: 325291
This patch fixes clang to not consider braced initializers for
aggregate elements of arrays to be potentially dependent on the
indices of the initialized elements. Resolves bug 18978:
initialize a large static array = clang oom?
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18978
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43187
llvm-svn: 325120
When we synthesize an implicit inner initializer list when analyzing an outer
initializer list, we add it to the outer list immediately, and then fill in the
inner list. This gives the outer list no chance to update its *-dependence bits
with those of the completed inner list. To fix this, re-add the inner list to
the outer list once it's completed.
Note that we do not recompute the *-dependence bits from scratch when we
complete an outer list; this would give the wrong result for the case where a
designated initializer overwrites a dependent initializer with a non-dependent
one. The resulting list in that case should still be dependent, even though all
traces of the dependence were removed from the semantic form.
llvm-svn: 324537
Summary:
Clang incorrectly reports empty unions as having a unique object representation. However, this is not correct since `sizeof(EmptyUnion) == 1` AKA it has 8 bits of padding. Therefore it should be treated the same as an empty struct and report `false`.
@erichkeane also suggested this fix should be merged into the 6.0 release branch, so the initial release of `__has_unique_object_representations` is as bug-free as possible.
Reviewers: erichkeane, rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42863
llvm-svn: 324134
Summary:
Use corutine function arguments to initialize a promise type, but only
if the promise type defines a constructor that takes those arguments.
Otherwise, fall back to the default constructor.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: rsmith, GorNishanov, eric_niebler
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: toby-allsopp, lewissbaker, EricWF, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41820
llvm-svn: 323381
Both are related to handling anonymous structures.
* clang didn't handle () around an anonymous struct variable.
* clang also crashed on syntax errors that could lead to other
syntactic constructs following the declaration of an
anonymous struct. While the code is invalid, that's not
a good reason to panic compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41788
llvm-svn: 322742
When parsing C++ type construction expressions with list initialization,
forward the locations of the braces to Sema.
Without these locations, the code coverage pass crashes on the given test
case, because the pass relies on getLocEnd() returning a valid location.
Here is what this patch does in more detail:
- Forwards init-list brace locations to Sema (ParseExprCXX),
- Builds an InitializationKind with these locations (SemaExprCXX), and
- Uses these locations for constructor initialization (SemaInit).
The remaining changes fall out of introducing a new overload for
creating direct-list InitializationKinds.
Testing: check-clang, and a stage2 coverage-enabled build of clang with
asserts enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41921
llvm-svn: 322729
We were trying to emit a diag::err_bad_multiversion_option diagnostic,
which expects an int as its first argument, with a string argument. As
it happens, the string `Feature` that was causing this was shadowing an
int `Feature` from the surrounding scope. :)
llvm-svn: 322530
While here, fix up the myriad other ways in which Sema's two "can this handler
catch that exception?" implementations get things wrong and unify them.
llvm-svn: 322431
Summary:
The STL types `std::pair` and `std::tuple` can both store reference types. However their constructors cannot adequately check if the initialization of reference types is safe. For example:
```
std::tuple<std::tuple<int> const&> t = 42;
// The stored reference is already dangling.
```
Libc++ has a best effort attempts in tuple to diagnose this, but they're not able to handle all valid cases (If I'm not mistaken). For example initialization of a reference from the result of a class's conversion operator. Libc++ would benefit from having a builtin traits which can provide a much better implementation.
This patch introduce the `__reference_binds_to_temporary(T, U)` trait that determines whether a reference of type `T` bound to an expression of type `U` would bind to a materialized temporary object.
Note that the trait simply returns false if `T` is not a reference type instead of reporting it as an error.
```
static_assert(__is_constructible(int const&, long));
static_assert(__reference_binds_to_temporary(int const&, long));
```
Reviewers: majnemer, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: compnerd, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29930
llvm-svn: 322334
In C++17, guaranteed copy elision means that there isn't necessarily a
constructor call when a local variable is initialized by a function call that
returns a scoped_lockable by value. In order to model the effects of
initializing a local variable with a function call returning a scoped_lockable,
pretend that the move constructor was invoked within the caller at the point of
return.
llvm-svn: 322316
GCC's attribute 'target', in addition to being an optimization hint,
also allows function multiversioning. We currently have the former
implemented, this is the latter's implementation.
This works by enabling functions with the same name/signature to coexist,
so that they can all be emitted. Multiversion state is stored in the
FunctionDecl itself, and SemaDecl manages the definitions.
Note that it ends up having to permit redefinition of functions so
that they can all be emitted. Additionally, all versions of the function
must be emitted, so this also manages that.
Note that this includes some additional rules that GCC does not, since
defining something as a MultiVersion function after a usage has been made illegal.
The only 'history rewriting' that happens is if a function is emitted before
it has been converted to a multiversion'ed function, at which point its name
needs to be changed.
Function templates and virtual functions are NOT yet supported (not supported
in GCC either).
Additionally, constructors/destructors are disallowed, but the former is
planned.
llvm-svn: 322028
Check whether we are comparing the same entity, not merely the same
declaration, and don't assume that weak declarations resolve to distinct
entities.
llvm-svn: 321976
during template argument deduction.
We already did this when the injected-class-name was in P, but missed the case
where it was in A. This (probably) can't happen except in implicit deduction
guides.
llvm-svn: 321779
Summary:
The diagnostic was mostly introduced in D38101 by me, as a reaction to wasting a lot of time, see [[ https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20171009/206427.html | mail ]].
However, the diagnostic is pretty dumb. While it works with no false-positives,
there are some questionable cases that are diagnosed when one would argue that they should not be.
The common complaint is that it diagnoses the comparisons between an `int` and
`long` when compiling for a 32-bit target as tautological, but not when
compiling for 64-bit targets. The underlying problem is obvious: data model.
In most cases, 64-bit target is `LP64` (`int` is 32-bit, `long` and pointer are
64-bit), and the 32-bit target is `ILP32` (`int`, `long`, and pointer are 32-bit).
I.e. the common pattern is: (pseudocode)
```
#include <limits>
#include <cstdint>
int main() {
using T1 = long;
using T2 = int;
T1 r;
if (r < std::numeric_limits<T2>::min()) {}
if (r > std::numeric_limits<T2>::max()) {}
}
```
As an example, D39149 was trying to fix this diagnostic in libc++, and it was not well-received.
This *could* be "fixed", by changing the diagnostics logic to something like
`if the types of the values being compared are different, but are of the same size, then do diagnose`,
and i even attempted to do so in D39462, but as @rjmccall rightfully commented,
that implementation is incomplete to say the least.
So to stop causing trouble, and avoid contaminating upcoming release, lets do this workaround:
* move these three diags (`warn_unsigned_always_true_comparison`, `warn_unsigned_enum_always_true_comparison`, `warn_tautological_constant_compare`) into it's own `-Wtautological-constant-in-range-compare`
* Disable them by default
* Make them part of `-Wextra`
* Additionally, give `warn_tautological_constant_compare` it's own flag `-Wtautological-type-limit-compare`.
I'm not happy about that name, but i can't come up with anything better.
This way all three of them can be enabled/disabled either altogether, or one-by-one.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, smeenai, rjmccall, rnk, mclow.lists, dim
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith, dim
Subscribers: thakis, compnerd, mehdi_amini, dim, hans, cfe-commits, rjmccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41512
llvm-svn: 321691
Previously, we would:
* compute the type of the conversion function and static invoker as a
side-effect of template argument deduction for a conversion
* re-compute the type as part of deduced return type deduction when building
the conversion function itself
Neither of these turns out to be quite correct. There are other ways to reach a
declaration of the conversion function than in a conversion (such as an
explicit call or friend declaration), and performing auto deduction causes the
function type to be rebuilt in the context of the lambda closure type (which is
different from the context in which it originally appeared, resulting in
spurious substitution failures for constructs that are valid in one context but
not the other, such as the use of an enclosing class's "this" pointer).
This patch switches us to use a different strategy: as before, we use the
declared type of the operator() to form the type of the conversion function and
invoker, but we now populate that type as part of return type deduction for the
conversion function. And the invoker is now treated as simply being an
implementation detail of building the conversion function, and isn't given
special treatment by template argument deduction for the conversion function
any more.
llvm-svn: 321683
(Re-submission of D39937 with fixed tests.)
Adjust wording for const-qualification mismatch to be a little more clear.
Also add another diagnostic for a ref qualifier mismatch, which previously produced a useless error (this error path is simply very old; see rL119336):
Before:
error: cannot initialize object parameter of type 'X0' with an expression of type 'X0'
After:
error: 'this' argument to member function 'rvalue' is an lvalue, but function has rvalue ref-qualifier
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41646
llvm-svn: 321609
Summary:
Adjust wording for const-qualification mismatch to be a little more clear.
Also add another diagnostic for a ref qualifier mismatch, which previously produced a useless error (this error path is simply very old; see rL119336):
Before:
error: cannot initialize object parameter of type 'X0' with an expression of type 'X0'
After:
error: 'this' argument to member function 'rvalue' is an lvalue, but function has rvalue ref-qualifier
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39937
llvm-svn: 321592
This is a slightly odd construct (it's more common to see "A (::B)()") but can
happen in friend declarations, and the parens are not redundant as they prevent
the :: binding to the left.
llvm-svn: 321318
An unscoped enumeration used as template argument, should not have any
qualified information about its enclosing scope, as its visibility is
global.
In the case of scoped enumerations, they must include information
about their enclosing scope.
Patch by Carlos Alberto Enciso!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39239
llvm-svn: 321312
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
The initializeLocal function of UnaryTransformTypeLoc missed
the UnderlyingTInfo member. This caused a null-dereference
issue, as reported in PR23421. This patch correctly initializss
the UnderlyingTInfo.
llvm-svn: 320765
Summary:
In D41064, I proposed adding `#pragma clang diagnostic ignored
"-Wuser-defined-literals"` to some of libc++'s headers, since these
warnings are now triggered by clang's new `-std=gnu++14` default:
```
$ cat test.cpp
#include <string>
$ clang -std=c++14 -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wextra -c test.cpp
In file included from test.cpp:1:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:470:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:763:29: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char> operator "" sv(const char *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:769:32: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<wchar_t> operator "" sv(const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:775:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char16_t> operator "" sv(const char16_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:781:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char32_t> operator "" sv(const char32_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
In file included from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4012:24: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char> operator "" s( const char *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4018:27: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<wchar_t> operator "" s( const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4024:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char16_t> operator "" s( const char16_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4030:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char32_t> operator "" s( const char32_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
8 warnings generated.
```
Both @aaron.ballman and @mclow.lists felt that adding this workaround to
the libc++ headers was the wrong way, and it should be fixed in clang
instead.
Here is a proposal to do just that. I verified that this suppresses the
warning, even when -Wsystem-headers is used, and that the warning is
still emitted for a declaration outside of system headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mclow.lists, aaron.ballman, andrew, emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41080
llvm-svn: 320755
There are many more expr types that can be a capability expr, like
CXXThisExpr, CallExpr, MemberExpr. Instead of enumerating all of them,
just check typeHasCapability for any type given.
Also add & and * operators to allowed unary operators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41224
llvm-svn: 320753
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
The two asserts are too aggressive. In C++ mode, an
enum is NOT considered an integral type, but an enum value
is allowed to be an enum. This patch relaxes the two asserts
to allow the enum value as well (as typechecking does).
llvm-svn: 320411
Summary:
This is a side-effect brought in by p0620r0, which allows other placeholder types (derived from `auto` and `decltype(auto)`) to be usable in a `new` expression with a single-clause //braced-init-list// as its initializer (8.3.4 [expr.new]/2). N3922 defined its semantics.
References:
http://wg21.link/p0620r0http://wg21.link/n3922
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39451
llvm-svn: 320401
Volodymyr Sapsai