nvlink does not support linking of cubin files archived in an archive.
This tool extracts all the cubin files in the given device specific archive
and pass them to nvlink. It is required for linking static device libraries
for nvptx.
Reviewed By: ye-luo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108291
A new revision identical to https://reviews.llvm.org/D101139
The parent revision of aforementioned revision seems to cause pre-merge checks to fail opaquely. Seeing if creating a new revision will work.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104138
Original commit message:
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This reverts commit 44a4000181.
We are seeing build failures due to missing dependency to libSupport and
CMake Error at tools/clang/tools/clang-repl/cmake_install.cmake
file INSTALL cannot find
In http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-July/143257.html we have
mentioned our plans to make some of the incremental compilation facilities
available in llvm mainline.
This patch proposes a minimal version of a repl, clang-repl, which enables
interpreter-like interaction for C++. For instance:
./bin/clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 42;
clang-repl> extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=42
clang-repl> quit
The patch allows very limited functionality, for example, it crashes on invalid
C++. The design of the proposed patch follows closely the design of cling. The
idea is to gather feedback and gradually evolve both clang-repl and cling to
what the community agrees upon.
The IncrementalParser class is responsible for driving the clang parser and
codegen and allows the compiler infrastructure to process more than one input.
Every input adds to the “ever-growing” translation unit. That model is enabled
by an IncrementalAction which prevents teardown when HandleTranslationUnit.
The IncrementalExecutor class hides some of the underlying implementation
details of the concrete JIT infrastructure. It exposes the minimal set of
functionality required by our incremental compiler/interpreter.
The Transaction class keeps track of the AST and the LLVM IR for each
incremental input. That tracking information will be later used to implement
error recovery.
The Interpreter class orchestrates the IncrementalParser and the
IncrementalExecutor to model interpreter-like behavior. It provides the public
API which can be used (in future) when using the interpreter library.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033
This patch adds new clang tool named amdgpu-arch which uses
HSA to detect installed AMDGPU and report back latter's march.
This tool is built only if system has HSA installed.
The value printed by amdgpu-arch is used to fill -march when
latter is not explicitly provided in -Xopenmp-target.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield, gregrodgers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99949
This patch adds new clang tool named amdgpu-arch which uses
HSA to detect installed AMDGPU and report back latter's march.
This tool is built only if system has HSA installed.
The value printed by amdgpu-arch is used to fill -march when
latter is not explicitly provided in -Xopenmp-target.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield, gregrodgers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99949
This patch adds new clang tool named amdgpu-arch which uses
HSA to detect installed AMDGPU and report back latter's march.
This tool is built only if system has HSA installed.
The value printed by amdgpu-arch is used to fill -march when
latter is not explicitly provided in -Xopenmp-target.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield, gregrodgers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99949
This adds the skeleton of the YAML Compiler for APINotes. This change
only adds the YAML IO model for the API Notes along with a new testing
tool `apinotes-test` which can be used to verify that can round trip the
YAML content properly. It provides the basis for the future work which
will add a binary serialization and deserialization format to the data
model.
This is based on the code contributed by Apple at
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project-staging/tree/staging/swift/apinotes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88859
Reviewed By: Gabor Marton
This patch removes the remaining part of the OpenMP offload linker scripts which was used for inserting device binaries into the output linked binary. Device binaries are now inserted into the host binary with a help of the wrapper bit-code file which contains device binaries as data. Wrapper bit-code file is dynamically created by the clang driver with a help of new tool clang-offload-wrapper which takes device binaries as input and produces bit-code file with required contents. Wrapper bit-code is then compiled to an object and resulting object is appended to the host linking by the clang driver.
This is the second part of the patch for eliminating OpenMP linker script (please see https://reviews.llvm.org/D64943).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68166
llvm-svn: 374219
dependencies over a JSON compilation database
This commit introduces an outline for the clang-scan-deps tool that will be
used to implement fast dependency discovery phase using implicit modules for
explicit module builds.
The initial version of the tool works by computing non-modular header dependencies
for files in the compilation database without any optimizations
(i.e. without source minimization from r362459).
The tool spawns a number of worker threads to run the clang compiler workers in parallel.
The immediate goal for clang-scan-deps is to create a ClangScanDeps library
which will be used to build up this tool to use the source minimization and
caching multi-threaded filesystem to implement the optimized non-incremental
dependency scanning phase for a non-modular build. This will allow us to do
benchmarks and comparisons for performance that the minimization and caching give us
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60233
llvm-svn: 363204
Summary:
This patch adds a libClang_shared library on *nix systems which exports the entire C++ API. In order to support this on Windows we should really refactor llvm-shlib and share code between the two.
This also uses a slightly different method for generating the shared library, which I should back-port to llvm-shlib. Instead of linking the static archives and passing linker flags to force loading the whole libraries, this patch creates object libraries for every library (which has no cost in the build system), and link the object libraries.
llvm-svn: 360985
Summary:
This patch adds a libClang_shared library on *nix systems which exports the entire C++ API. In order to support this on Windows we should really refactor llvm-shlib and share code between the two.
This also uses a slightly different method for generating the shared library, which I should back-port to llvm-shlib. Instead of linking the static archives and passing linker flags to force loading the whole libraries, this patch creates object libraries for every library (which has no cost in the build system), and link the object libraries.
Reviewers: tstellar, winksaville
Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61909
llvm-svn: 360946
Summary: This is just changing naming and documentation to be general about external definitions that can be imported for cross translation unit analysis. There is at least a plan to add VarDecls: D46421
Reviewers: NoQ, xazax.hun, martong, a.sidorin, george.karpenkov, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, martong
Subscribers: mgorny, whisperity, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, rnkovacs, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56441
llvm-svn: 350852
This patch introduces a class that can help to build tools that require cross
translation unit facilities. This class allows function definitions to be loaded
from external AST files based on an index. In order to use this functionality an
index is required. The index format is a flat text file but it might be
replaced with a different solution in the near future. USRs are used as names to
look up the functions definitions. This class also does caching to avoid
redundant loading of AST files.
Right now only function defnitions can be loaded using this API because this is
what the in progress cross translation unit feature of the Static Analyzer
requires. In to future this might be extended to classes, types etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34512
llvm-svn: 313975
local-rename action
This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.
The following options are supported by clang-refactor:
-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).
Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.
The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:
When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574
llvm-svn: 313244
This is the first commit for the "Clang-based C/C++ diff tool" GSoC project.
ASTDiff is a new library that computes a structural AST diff between two ASTs
using the gumtree algorithm. Clang-diff is a new Clang tool that will show
the structural code changes between different ASTs.
Patch by Johannes Altmanninger!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34329
llvm-svn: 308731
Recommitted after formal approval.
LLVM's JIT is now the foundation of dynamic-compilation features for many languages. Clang also has low-level support for dynamic compilation (ASTImporter and ExternalASTSource, notably). How the compiler is set up for dynamic parsing is generally left up to individual clients, for example LLDB's C/C++/Objective-C expression parser and the ROOT project.
Although this arrangement offers external clients the flexibility to implement dynamic features as they see fit, the lack of an in-tree client means that subtle bugs can be introduced that cause regressions in the external clients but aren't caught by tests (or users) until much later. LLDB for example regularly encounters complicated ODR violation scenarios where it is not immediately clear who is at fault.
Other external clients (notably, Cling) rely on similar functionality, and another goal is to break this functionality up into composable parts so that any client can be built easily on top of Clang without requiring extensive additional code.
I propose that the parts required to build a simple expression parser be added to Clang. Initially, I aim to have the following features:
A piece that looks up external declarations from a variety of sources (e.g., from previous dynamic compilations, from modules, or from DWARF) and uses clear conflict resolution rules to reconcile differences, with easily understood errors. This functionality will be supported by in-tree tests.
A piece that works hand in hand with the LLVM JIT to resolve the locations of external declarations so that e.g. variables can be redeclared and (for high-performance applications like DTrace) external variables can be accessed directly from the registers where they reside.
This commit adds a tester that parses a sequence of source files and then uses them as source data for an expression. External references are resolved using an ExternalASTSource that responds to name queries using an ASTImporter. This is the setup that LLDB uses, and the motivating reason for MinimalImport in ASTImporter. When complete, this tester will implement the first of the above goals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27180
llvm-svn: 290367
LLVM's JIT is now the foundation of dynamic-compilation features for many languages. Clang also has low-level support for dynamic compilation (ASTImporter and ExternalASTSource, notably). How the compiler is set up for dynamic parsing is generally left up to individual clients, for example LLDB's C/C++/Objective-C expression parser and the ROOT project.
Although this arrangement offers external clients the flexibility to implement dynamic features as they see fit, the lack of an in-tree client means that subtle bugs can be introduced that cause regressions in the external clients but aren't caught by tests (or users) until much later. LLDB for example regularly encounters complicated ODR violation scenarios where it is not immediately clear who is at fault.
Other external clients (notably, Cling) rely on similar functionality, and another goal is to break this functionality up into composable parts so that any client can be built easily on top of Clang without requiring extensive additional code.
I propose that the parts required to build a simple expression parser be added to Clang. Initially, I aim to have the following features:
- A piece that looks up external declarations from a variety of sources (e.g., from previous dynamic compilations, from modules, or from DWARF) and uses clear conflict resolution rules to reconcile differences, with easily understood errors. This functionality will be supported by in-tree tests.
- A piece that works hand in hand with the LLVM JIT to resolve the locations of external declarations so that e.g. variables can be redeclared and (for high-performance applications like DTrace) external variables can be accessed directly from the registers where they reside.
This commit adds a tester that parses a sequence of source files and then uses them as source data for an expression. External references are resolved using an ExternalASTSource that responds to name queries using an ASTImporter. This is the setup that LLDB uses, and the motivating reason for MinimalImport in ASTImporter. When complete, this tester will implement the first of the above goals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27180
llvm-svn: 290004
Summary:
One of the goals of programming models that support offloading (e.g. OpenMP) is to enable users to offload with little effort, by annotating the code with a few pragmas. I'd also like to save users the trouble of changing their existent applications' build system. So having the compiler always return a single file instead of one for the host and each target even if the user is doing separate compilation is desirable.
This diff proposes a tool named clang-offload-bundler (happy to change the name if required) that is used to bundle files associated with the same user source file but different targets, or to unbundle a file into separate files associated with different targets.
This tool supports the driver support for OpenMP under review in http://reviews.llvm.org/D9888. The tool is used there to enable separate compilation, so that the very first action on input files that are not source files is a "unbundling action" and the very last non-linking action is a "bundling action".
The format of the bundled files is currently very simple: text formats are concatenated with comments that have a magic string and target identifying triple in between, and binary formats have a header that contains the triple and the offset and size of the code for host and each target.
The goal is to improve this tool in the future to deal with archive files so that each individual file in the archive is properly dealt with. We see that archives are very commonly used in current applications to combine separate compilation results. So I'm convinced users would enjoy this feature.
This tool can be used like this:
`clang-offload-bundler -targets=triple1,triple2 -type=ii -inputs=a.triple1.ii,a.triple2.ii -outputs=a.ii`
or
`clang-offload-bundler -targets=triple1,triple2 -type=ii -outputs=a.triple1.ii,a.triple2.ii -inputs=a.ii -unbundle`
I implemented the tool under clang/tools. Please let me know if something like this should live somewhere else.
This patch is prerequisite for http://reviews.llvm.org/D9888.
Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith, echristo, chandlerc, tra, jlebar, ABataev, Hahnfeld
Subscribers: whchung, caomhin, andreybokhanko, arpith-jacob, carlo.bertolli, mehdi_amini, guansong, Hahnfeld, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D13909
llvm-svn: 279632
The rewrite facility's footprint is small so it's not worth going to these
lengths to support disabling at configure time, particularly since key compiler
features now depend on it.
Meanwhile the Objective-C rewriters have been moved under the
ENABLE_CLANG_ARCMT umbrella for now as they're comparatively heavy and still
potentially worth excluding from lightweight builds.
Tests are now passing with any combination of feature flags. The flags
historically haven't been tested by LLVM's build servers so caveat emptor.
llvm-svn: 213171
This makes it possible to build the clang-format vs plugin from the cmake build.
It is a hack, as it shells out to "devenv" to actually build it, but it's hidden
away in a corner behind a flag, and it provides a convenient way of building the
plug-in from the command-line together with the rest of clang.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2310
llvm-svn: 196299
Thanks for pointing this out, Stephen. I think this is right now -- I
attempted to try all four valid combinations with both the autoconf and
CMake builds.
See also LLVM changes to the configure script.
llvm-svn: 189027
Previously, the CMake build still tried to link clang against the static
analyzer libraries, even if CLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER was off.
Furthermore, clang-check depends on the analyzer, so it should be disabled
(in both CMake and configure builds).
In theory, clang-check could be made to conditionally include analyzer
support (like clang itself), but for now this at least gets a CMake ALL_BUILD
working.
Patch by Stephen Kelly, modified by me.
llvm-svn: 185548
if checked out under clang/tools/extra.
This is mostly so folks other than me can start to test. Documentation,
details, and an announcement are still in the works.
llvm-svn: 161405
Provides an API to run clang tools (FrontendActions) as standalone tools,
or repeatedly in-memory in a process. This is useful for unit-testing,
map-reduce style applications, source transformation daemons or command line
tools.
The ability to run over multiple translation units with different command
line arguments enables building up refactoring tools that need to apply
transformations across translation unit boundaries.
See tools/clang-check/ClangCheck.cpp for an example.
llvm-svn: 154008
Some interesting stats from 'diagtool list-warnings' on the current version of clang:
Percentage of warnings with flags: 48.79%
Number of unique flags: 148
Average number of diagnostics per flag: 2.041
llvm-svn: 137109
Saiyedul Islam