This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214112
This is the first of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
This commit makes sure unspecified_parameter is a DIType to enable converting
the type array for a subroutine type to an array of DITypes.
This commit should have no functionality change. With this commit, we may
change unspecified type to be a DITrivialType instead of a DIType.
llvm-svn: 214111
The new flag, WantFunctionLikeCasts, covers a subset of the keywords
covered by WantTypeSpecifiers that can be used in casts that look like
function calls, e.g. "return long(5);", while excluding the keywords
like "enum" and "const" that would be included when WantTypeSpecifiers
is true but cannot be used in something that looks like a function call.
llvm-svn: 214109
inspection in the proccess, and shuffle the logging in the DAG combiner
around a bit.
With this it is much easier to follow what the legalizer is doing. It
should even accurately present most of the strange legalization
operations where a single node is replaced by multiple nodes, etc. There
is still some information lost (we log SDNodes not SDValues so we don't
log which result is used for which thing), but I think this is much
closer to a usable system. Notably, this will make it *much* more
apparant when legalization is actually happening inside the combiner, or
when there is a cycle caused by interactions of the legalizer and the
combiner.
The "bug" I fixed here I'm not sure is remotely possible to trigger. We
were only adding one of the nodes in a replacement to the updated set
rather than all of the nodes in the replacement. Realistically, the
worst result of this are nodes not getting back onto the worklist in the
DAG combiner. I doubt it is possible to trigger this today, and
I certainly don't have any ideas about how, but this at least brings the
code into alignment with the principled operation of the routine.
llvm-svn: 214105
This patch creates a simple ProcessWindows process plugin.
The only thing it knows how to do currently is create processes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4681
llvm-svn: 214094
Assuming that the user's home directory is at ~ is incorrect on
Windows. This patch delegates the request to LLVM's support
library, which already provides a cross-platform implementation
of this function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4674
llvm-svn: 214093
i386, i486, i486sx, and i686 are all indistinguishable as far as
PE/COFF files are concerned. This patch adds support for all of
these architectures to PlatformWindows.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4658
llvm-svn: 214092
til::SExpr. This is a large patch, with many small changes to pretty printing
and expression lowering to make the new SExpr representation equivalent in
functionality to the old.
llvm-svn: 214089
use is deprecated in favour of llvm_map_components_to_libnames()
Although message(DEPRECATION "msg") would probably be a better fit this
does nothing if CMAKE_ERROR_DEPRECATED and CMAKE_WARNING_DEPRECATED are
both off, which is the default.
llvm-svn: 214078
While Clang now supports both ELFv1 and ELFv2 ABIs, their use is currently
hard-coded via the target triple: powerpc64-linux is always ELFv1, while
powerpc64le-linux is always ELFv2.
These are of course the most common scenarios, but in principle it is
possible to support the ELFv2 ABI on big-endian or the ELFv1 ABI on
little-endian systems (and GCC does support that), and there are some
special use cases for that (e.g. certain Linux kernel versions could
only be built using ELFv1 on LE).
This patch implements the Clang side of supporting this, based on the
LLVM commit 214072. The command line options -mabi=elfv1 or -mabi=elfv2
select the desired ABI if present. (If not, Clang uses the same default
rules as now.)
Specifically, the patch implements the following changes based on the
presence of the -mabi= option:
In the driver:
- Pass the appropiate -target-abi flag to the back-end
- Select the correct dynamic loader version (/lib64/ld64.so.[12])
In the preprocessor:
- Define _CALL_ELF to the appropriate value (1 or 2)
In the compiler back-end:
- Select the correct ABI in TargetInfo.cpp
- Select the desired ABI for LLVM via feature (elfv1/elfv2)
llvm-svn: 214074
While LLVM now supports both ELFv1 and ELFv2 ABIs, their use is currently
hard-coded via the target triple: powerpc64-linux is always ELFv1, while
powerpc64le-linux is always ELFv2.
These are of course the most common scenarios, but in principle it is
possible to support the ELFv2 ABI on big-endian or the ELFv1 ABI on
little-endian systems (and GCC does support that), and there are some
special use cases for that (e.g. certain Linux kernel versions could
only be built using ELFv1 on LE).
This patch implements the LLVM side of supporting this. As precedent
on other platforms suggests, ABI options are passed to the back-end as
features. Thus, this patch implements two features "elfv1" and "elfv2"
that select the desired ABI if present. (If not, the LLVM uses the
same default rules as now.)
llvm-svn: 214072
It doesn't make sense to suggest 'virtual' as clang-tidy would complain
about that on the next iteration (we are never issuing warnings for the
base function).
llvm-svn: 214063
These are only used when the 'ld' in the path is gold and the plugin has
been built, but it is already a start to make sure we don't regress features
that cannot be tested with llvm-lto.
llvm-svn: 214058
The subtarget information is the ultimate source of truth for the feature set
that is enabled at this point. We would previously not propagate the feature
information to the subtarget. While this worked for the most part (features
would be enabled/disabled as requested), if another operation that changed the
feature bits was encountered (such as a mode switch via a .arm or .thumb
directive), we would end up resetting the behaviour of the architectural
extensions.
Handling this properly requires a slightly more complicated handling. We need
to check if the feature is now being toggled. If so, only then do we toggle the
features. In return, we no longer have to calculate the feature bits ourselves.
The test changes are mostly to the diagnosis, which is now more uniform (a nice
side effect!). Add an additional test to ensure that we handle this case
properly.
Thanks to Nico Weber for alerting me to this issue!
llvm-svn: 214057
Manman Ren