This is mostly to test the waters. I'd like to get results from FNT
build bots and other bots running on non-x86 platforms.
This feature has been pretty heavily tested over the last few months by
me, and it fixes several of the execution time regressions caused by the
inlining work by preventing inlining decisions from radically impacting
block layout.
I've seen very large improvements in yacr2 and ackermann benchmarks,
along with the expected noise across all of the benchmark suite whenever
code layout changes. I've analyzed all of the regressions and fixed
them, or found them to be impossible to fix. See my email to llvmdev for
more details.
I'd like for this to be in 3.1 as it complements the inliner changes,
but if any failures are showing up or anyone has concerns, it is just
a flag flip and so can be easily turned off.
I'm switching it on tonight to try and get at least one run through
various folks' performance suites in case SPEC or something else has
serious issues with it. I'll watch bots and revert if anything shows up.
llvm-svn: 154816
- This fixed a number of bugs in if-converter, tail merging, and post-allocation
scheduler. If-converter now runs branch folding / tail merging first to
maximize if-conversion opportunities.
- Also changed the t2IT instruction slightly. It now defines the ITSTATE
register which is read by instructions in the IT block.
- Added Thumb2 specific hazard recognizer to ensure the scheduler doesn't
change the instruction ordering in the IT block (since IT mask has been
finalized). It also ensures no other instructions can be scheduled between
instructions in the IT block.
This is not yet enabled.
llvm-svn: 106344
remove RemoveDuplicateSuccessor, as it is no longer necessary, and because
it breaks assumptions made in
MachineBasicBlock::isOnlyReachableByFallthrough.
Convert test/CodeGen/X86/omit-label.ll to FileCheck and add a testcase
for PR4732.
test/CodeGen/Thumb2/thumb2-ifcvt2.ll sees a diff with this commit due to
it being bugpoint-reduced to the point where it doesn't matter what the
condition for the branch is.
Add some more interesting code to
test/CodeGen/X86/2009-08-06-branchfolder-crash.ll, which is the testcase
that originally motivated the RemoveDuplicateSuccessor code, to help
verify that the original problem isn't being re-broken.
llvm-svn: 79338
Chandler Carruth