The patch from r310028 fixed things to work with the new
`LLVMTargetMachine` constructor that came in on r309911.
However, the fix was partial since an object of type
`CodeModel::Model` must be passed to `LLVMTargetMachine`
(not one of `Optional<CodeModel::Model>`).
This patch fixes the problem in the same fashion that r309911
did for other machines: by checking if the passed optional
code model has a value and using `CodeModel::Small` if not.
llvm-svn: 310200
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
We should rewrite this using the generic branch relaxation pass, but for
the moment having this pass is better than hitting an assertion error.
llvm-svn: 307109
Previously, if a basic block ended with a FRMIDX instruction, we would
end up doing something like this.
*std::next(MBB.end())
Which would hit an error:
"Assertion `!NodePtr->isKnownSentinel()' failed."
llvm-svn: 307057
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
This adds a callback to the LLVMTargetMachine that lets target indicate
that they do not pass the machine verifier checks in all cases yet.
This is intended to be a temporary measure while the targets are fixed
allowing us to enable the machine verifier by default with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33696
llvm-svn: 304320
TargetPassConfig is not useful for targets that do not use the CodeGen
library, so we may just as well store a pointer to an
LLVMTargetMachine instead of just to a TargetMachine.
While at it, also change the constructor to take a reference instead of a
pointer as the TM must not be nullptr.
llvm-svn: 304247
Summary: CPI does not read the status register, but only writes it.
Reviewers: dylanmckay
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33223
llvm-svn: 304116
Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
Because it was a callee-saved register, we automatically generated code
to spill and unspill its original value so that it is restored after the
function returns.
The problem is that this code was being generated before the epilogue.
The epilogue itself uses the Y register, which could be prematurely
restored by the CSR restoration process.
This removes R29R28 from the CSR list and changes the prologue/epilogue
code to handle it explicitly.
llvm-svn: 301887
1. RegisterClass::getSize() is split into two functions:
- TargetRegisterInfo::getRegSizeInBits(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
- TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillSize(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
2. RegisterClass::getAlignment() is replaced by:
- TargetRegisterInfo::getSpillAlignment(const TargetRegisterClass &RC) const;
This will allow making those values depend on subtarget features in the
future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31783
llvm-svn: 301221
r298178 capitalized the fields in `ArgListEntry`. All the official
targets were updated accordingly, but as an experimental target AVR
was missed.
llvm-svn: 298677
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Meador Inge