* If the unsigned type is smaller than the signed type, never warn, because
its value will not change when zero-extended to the larger type.
* If we're testing for (in)equality, and the unsigned value is an integer
constant whose sign bit is not set, never warn, because even though the
signed value might change, it can't affect the result of the equality.
Also make the comparison test cases much more rigorous, and have them expose
the subtle differences between C and C++ here.
llvm-svn: 86242
DiagnoseSignCompare into Sema::CheckSignCompare and call it from more places.
Add some enumerator tests. These seem to expose some oddities in the
types we're converting C++ enumerators to; in particular, they're converting
to unsigned before int, which seems to contradict 4.5 [conv.prom] p2.
Note to self: stop baiting Doug in my commit messages.
llvm-svn: 86128
avoid emitting a warning on "someptr > 0". This is obviously questionable (they
could use != instead) but is reasonable, and the warning "ordered comparison
between pointer and integer" didn't make a ton of sense because 0 is a valid
null pointer constant.
Just silence the warning in this case, it is unlikely to indicate a bug.
llvm-svn: 79743
using "-parse-ast -verify".
Updated all test cases (using a sed script) that invoked -parse-ast-check to
now use -parse-ast -verify.
Fixed a bug where using "-verify" instead of "-parse-ast-check" would not
correctly create the DiagClient needed to accumulate diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 42365
Modified Type::typesAreCompatible() to use the above.
This fixes the following bug submitted by Keith Bauer (thanks!).
int equal(char *a, const char *b)
{
return a == b;
}
Also tweaked Sema::CheckCompareOperands() to ignore the qualifiers when
comparing two pointer types (though it doesn't relate directly to this bug).
llvm-svn: 41476
char *C;
C != ((void*)0);
Should not warn about incompatible pointer types. Also, make sure to
insert an implicit conversion even if the operand is null.
llvm-svn: 41408
John McCall