Add mir-check-debug pass to check MIR-level debug info.
For IR-level, currently, LLVM have debugify + check-debugify to generate
and check debug IR. Much like the IR-level pass debugify, mir-debugify
inserts sequentially increasing line locations to each MachineInstr in a
Module, But there is no equivalent MIR-level check-debugify pass, So now
we support it at "mir-check-debug".
Reviewed By: djtodoro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91595
The `assumes` directive is an OpenMP 5.1 feature that allows the user to
provide assumptions to the optimizer. Assumptions can refer to
directives (`absent` and `contains` clauses), expressions (`holds`
clause), or generic properties (`no_openmp_routines`, `ext_ABCD`, ...).
The `assumes` spelling is used for assumptions in the global scope while
`assume` is used for executable contexts with an associated structured
block.
This patch only implements the global spellings. While clauses with
arguments are "accepted" by the parser, they will simply be ignored for
now. The implementation lowers the assumptions directly to the
`AssumptionAttr`.
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91980
Don't iterate over SCC as we potentially modify it.
Verify module (and fix some broken ones).
Only run pass once and make sure that it's actually run.
Rename tests to just end in a number since I'm planning on adding a
bunch more which won't have good individual names. Instead, add comments
on the transformations that each test does.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93427
Currently errors detected when parsing the YAML for .clang-tidy files are always printed to errs.
For clang-tidy binary workflows this usually isn't an issue, but using clang-tidy as a library for integrations may want to handle displaying those errors in their own specific way.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92920
This patchs adds CMake variables to add subdirectories and include
directories for libomptarget and explicitly gives the location of source
files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93290
This change enables pseudo-probe-based sample counts to be consumed by the sample profile loader under the regular `-fprofile-sample-use` switch with minimal adjustments to the existing sample file formats. After the counts are imported, a probe helper, aka, a `PseudoProbeManager` object, is automatically launched to verify the CFG checksum of every function in the current compilation against the corresponding checksum from the profile. Mismatched checksums will cause a function profile to be slipped. A `SampleProfileProber` pass is scheduled before any of the `SampleProfileLoader` instances so that the CFG checksums as well as probe mappings are available during the profile loading time. The `PseudoProbeManager` object is set up right after the profile reading is done. In the future a CFG-based fuzzy matching could be done in `PseudoProbeManager`.
Samples will be applied only to pseudo probe instructions as well as probed callsites once the checksum verification goes through. Those instructions are processed in the same way that regular instructions would be processed in the line-number-based scenario. In other words, a function is processed in a regular way as if it was reduced to just containing pseudo probes (block probes and callsites).
**Adjustment to profile format **
A CFG checksum field is being added to the existing AutoFDO profile formats. So far only the text format and the extended binary format are supported. For the text format, a new line like
```
!CFGChecksum: 12345
```
is added to the end of the body sample lines. For the extended binary profile format, we introduce a metadata section to store the checksum map from function names to their CFG checksums.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92347
Currently we add individual BB to BlockFilterSet if its frequency satisfies
LoopFreq / Freq <= LoopToColdBlockRatio
LoopFreq is edge frequency from outside to loop header.
LoopToColdBlockRatio is a command line parameter.
It doesn't make sense since we always layout whole chain, not individual BBs.
It may also cause a tricky problem. Sometimes it is possible that the LoopFreq
of an inner loop is smaller than LoopFreq of outer loop. So a BB can be in
BlockFilterSet of inner loop, but not in BlockFilterSet of outer loop,
like .cold in the test case. So it is added to the chain of inner loop. When
work on the outer loop, .cold is not added to BlockFilterSet, so the edge to
successor .problem is not counted in UnscheduledPredecessors of .problem chain.
But other blocks in the inner loop are added BlockFilterSet, so the whole inner
loop chain can be layout, and markChainSuccessors is called to decrease
UnscheduledPredecessors of following chains. markChainSuccessors calls
markBlockSuccessors for every BB, even it is not in BlockFilterSet, like .cold,
so .problem chain's UnscheduledPredecessors is decreased, but this edge was not
counted on in fillWorkLists, so .problem chain's UnscheduledPredecessors
becomes 0 when it still has an unscheduled predecessor .pred! And it causes
problems in following various successor BB selection algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89088
Details: Jump Threading does not make sense for the targets with divergent CF
since they do not use branch prediction for speculative execution.
Also in the high level IR there is no enough information to conclude that the branch is divergent or uniform.
This may cause errors in further CF lowering.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93302
This allows ASTs to be merged when they contain GenericSelectionExpr
nodes (this is _Generic from C11). This is needed, for example, for
CTU analysis of C code that makes use of _Generic, like the Linux
kernel.
The node is already supported in the AST, but it didn't have a matcher
in ASTMatchers. So, this change adds the matcher and adds support to
ASTImporter. Additionally, this change adds support for structural
equivalence of _Generic in the AST.
Reviewed By: martong, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92600
The ABI explains that %fs:(%eax) zero-extends %eax to 64 bits, and adds
that the TLS base address, but that the TLS base address need not be
at the start of the TLS block, TLS references may use negative offsets.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93158
Commit 9e52c43090 removed the directive
defining LINE_1600 but left a string substitution to that variable in a
CHECK-NOT directive. This will make that CHECK-NOT directive always fail
to match, no matter the string.
This commit follows the pattern done in
9e52c43090 of simplifying the CHECK-NOT to
only look for the function name and the opening parenthesis, thereby not
requiring the LINE_1600 variable.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93350
A first real transformation that didn't already knew how to do that,
but it's pretty tame - either change successor of all the predecessors
of a block and carefully delay deletion of the block until afterwards
the DomTree updates are appled, or add a successor to the block.
There wasn't a great test coverage for this, so i added extra, to be sure.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Fixes DomTree preservation for a large number of tests,
all of which are marked as such so that they do not regress.
... so just ensure that we pass DomTreeUpdater it into it.
Apparently, there were no dedicated tests just for that functionality,
so i'm adding one here.
First step after e113317958,
in these tests, DomTree is valid afterwards, so mark them as such,
so that they don't regress.
In further steps, SimplifyCFG transforms shall taught to preserve DomTree,
in as small steps as possible.
Installing clang-format-11 doesn't seem to work if it's done before
we've installed LLVM. I must admit I didn't try to get to the bottom
of the issue, since installing it after seems to work.
Raw profile count values for each BB are not kept after profile
annotation. We record function entry count and branch weights
and use them to compute the count when needed. This mechanism
works well in a perfect world, but often breaks in real programs,
because of number prevision, inconsistent profile, or bugs in
BFI). This patch uses sum of profile count values to fix
function entry count to make the BFI count close to real profile
counts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61540
Two problems fixed:
* an old version of clang-format get installed by default (6.0).
* git-clang-format is not present, only git-clang-format-<version> (e.g. git-clang-format-6.0).
Solution:
* install clang-format-11 with explicit version
* make symlink git-clang-format to the latest version of git-clang-format-<version>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93201
Similar to D52401. Normally operator delete is defined in libc++abi
(LIBCPP_DISABLE_NEW_DELETE_DEFINITIONS is off by default).
C89 4.10.3.2 The free function
C99 7.20.3.2 The free function
C11 7.22.3.3 The free function
If ptr is a null pointer, no action shall occur.
free on MSDN:
If memblock is NULL, the pointer is ignored and free immediately returns.
Reviewed By: #libc_abi, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93339
Here's another minimal step suggested by D93229 / D93397 .
(I'm trying to be extra careful in these changes because
load transforms are easy to get wrong.)
We can optimistically choose the greater alignment of a
load and its pointer operand. As the test diffs show, this
can improve what would have been unaligned vector loads
into aligned loads.
When we enhance with gep offsets, we will need to adjust
the alignment calculation to include that offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93406
Given the following code:
```
void Foo(int);
void Baz()
{
Bar(sizeof int);
}
```
The error message which is printed today is this:
```
error: expected parentheses around type name in sizeof expression
```
There is no source location printed whatsoever, so fixing a compile break like this becomes extremely hard in a large codebase.
My change improves the error message. But it doesn't output a FixItHint because I wasn't able to figure out how to get the locations for left and right parens. So any tips would be appreciated.
```
<source>:7:6: error: expected parentheses around type name in sizeof expression
Bar(sizeof int);
^
```
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91129
There are out-of-tree tools using clang-offload-bundler to extract
bundles from bundled files. When a bundle is not in the bundled
file, clang-offload-bundler is expected to emit an error message
and return non-zero value. However currently clang-offload-bundler
silently generates empty file for the missing bundles.
Since OpenMP/HIP toolchains expect the current behavior, an option
-allow-missing-bundles is added to let clang-offload-bundler
create empty file when a bundle is missing when unbundling.
The unbundling job action is updated to use this option by
default.
clang-offload-bundler itself will emit error when a bundle
is missing when unbundling by default.
Changes are also made to check duplicate targets in -targets
option and emit error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93068
Test flakiness was fixed by: 9edcedf7f2
Runs these tests to verify that all parts of the lowering work correctly.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93384
Define Async runtime related typedefs in the `mlir::runtime` namespace.
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93391
Names in EQUIVALENCE statements are only allowed to indicate local
objects as per 19.5.1.4, paragraph 2, item (10). Thus, a name appearing
in an EQUIVALENCE statement with no corresponding declaration in the
same scope is an implicit declaration of the name. If that scope
contains an IMPLICIT NONE, it's an error.
I implemented this by adding a state variable to ScopeHandler to
indicate if we're resolving the names in an EQUIVALENCE statement and
then checked this state when resolving names. I also added a test to
the existing tests for EQUIVALENCE statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93345
- the !gpu.async.token is the second result of 'gpu.alloc async', not the first.
- async.execute construction takes operand types not yet wrapped in !async.value.
- fix typo
Reviewed By: herhut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93156
This is being recommitted to try and address the MSVC complaint.
This patch implements a DDG printer pass that generates a graph in
the DOT description language, providing a more visually appealing
representation of the DDG. Similar to the CFG DOT printer, this
functionality is provided under an option called -dot-ddg and can
be generated in a less verbose mode under -dot-ddg-only option.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90159
As discussed in D93229, we only need a minimal alignment constraint
when querying whether a hypothetical vector load is safe. We still
pass/use the potentially stronger alignment attribute when checking
costs and creating the new load.
There's already a test that changes with the minimum code change,
so splitting this off as a preliminary commit independent of any
gep/offset enhancements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93397
Xiang1 Zhang