Our previous value of "16 + 8 + MaxCallFrameSize" for ParentFrameOffset
is incorrect when CSRs are involved. We were supposed to have a test
case to catch this, but it wasn't very rigorous.
The main effect here is that calling _CxxThrowException inside a
catchpad doesn't immediately crash on MOVAPS when you have an odd number
of CSRs.
llvm-svn: 250583
This makes catchret look more like a branch, and less like a weird use
of BlockAddress. It also lets us get away from
llvm.x86.seh.restoreframe, which relies on the old parentfpoffset label
arithmetic.
llvm-svn: 247936
Summary:
32-bit funclets have short prologues that allocate enough stack for the
largest call in the whole function. The runtime saves CSRs for the
funclet. It doesn't restore CSRs after we finally transfer control back
to the parent funciton via a CATCHRET, but that's a separate issue.
32-bit funclets also have to adjust the incoming EBP value, which is
what llvm.x86.seh.recoverframe does in the old model.
64-bit funclets need to spill CSRs as normal. For simplicity, this just
spills the same set of CSRs as the parent function, rather than trying
to compute different CSR sets for the parent function and each funclet.
64-bit funclets also allocate enough stack space for the largest
outgoing call frame, like 32-bit.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12546
llvm-svn: 247092
function.
This was the same as getFrameIndexReference, but without the FrameReg
output.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12042
llvm-svn: 245148
When optimizing for size, replace "addl $4, %esp" and "addl $8, %esp"
following a call by one or two pops, respectively. We don't try to do it in
general, but only when the stack adjustment immediately follows a call - which
is the most common case.
That allows taking a short-cut when trying to find a free register to pop into,
instead of a full-blown liveness check. If the adjustment immediately follows a
call, then every register the call clobbers but doesn't define should be dead at
that point, and can be used.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11749
llvm-svn: 244578
This changes TargetFrameLowering::processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan():
- Rename the function to determineCalleeSaves()
- Pass a bitset of callee saved registers by reference, thus avoiding
the function-global PhysRegUsed bitset in MachineRegisterInfo.
- Without PhysRegUsed the implementation is fine tuned to not save
physcial registers which are only read but never modified.
Related to rdar://21539507
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10909
llvm-svn: 242165
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Deduplicates some code and lets us use LEA on atom when adjusting the
stack around callee-cleanup calls. This is the only intended
functionality change.
llvm-svn: 240044
There is a one-to-one relationship between X86Subtarget and
X86FrameLowering, but every frame lowering method would previously pull
the subtarget off the MachineFunction and query some subtarget
properties.
Over time, these locals began to grow in complexity and it became
important to keep their names and meaning in sync across all of the
frame lowering methods, leading to duplication. We can eliminate that
duplication by computing them once in the constructor.
llvm-svn: 239948
With this patch the x86 backend is now shrink-wrapping capable
and this functionality can be tested by using the
-enable-shrink-wrap switch.
The next step is to make more test and enable shrink-wrapping by
default for x86.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 238293
The problem was that I slipped a change required for shrink-wrapping, namely I
used getFirstTerminator instead of the getLastNonDebugInstr that was here before
the refactoring, whereas the surrounding code is not yet patched for that.
Original message:
[X86] Refactor the prologue emission to prepare for shrink-wrapping.
- Add a late pass to expand pseudo instructions (tail call and EH returns).
Instead of doing it in the prologue emission.
- Factor some static methods in X86FrameLowering to ease code sharing.
NFC.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 238035
Revert "[X86] Refactor the prologue emission to prepare for shrink-wrapping."
This reverts commit 6b3b93fc8b68a2c806aa992ee4bd3d7f61898d4b.
This reverts commit ab0b15dff8539826283a59c2dd700a18a9680e0f.
llvm-svn: 238011
- Add a late pass to expand pseudo instructions (tail call and EH returns).
Instead of doing it in the prologue emission.
- Factor some static methods in X86FrameLowering to ease code sharing.
NFC.
Related to <rdar://problem/20821487>
llvm-svn: 237977
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
(Re-commit of r227728)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227752
This moves the transformation introduced in r223757 into a separate MI pass.
This allows it to cover many more cases (not only cases where there must be a
reserved call frame), and perform rudimentary call folding. It still doesn't
have a heuristic, so it is enabled only for optsize/minsize, with stack
alignment <= 8, where it ought to be a fairly clear win.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6789
llvm-svn: 227728
In the large code model, we now put __chkstk in %r11 before calling it.
Refactor the code so that we only do this once. Simplify things by using
__chkstk_ms instead of __chkstk on cygming. We already use that symbol
in the prolog emission, and it simplifies our logic.
Second half of PR18582.
llvm-svn: 227519
win64: Call __chkstk through a register with the large code model
Fixes half of PR18582. True dynamic allocas will still have a
CALL64pcrel32 which will fail.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7267
llvm-svn: 227503
This handles the simplest case for mov -> push conversion:
1. x86-32 calling convention, everything is passed through the stack.
2. There is no reserved call frame.
3. Only registers or immediates are pushed, no attempt to combine a mem-reg-mem sequence into a single PUSHmm.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6503
llvm-svn: 223757
This is the second patch in a small series. This patch contains the MachineInstruction and x86-64 backend pieces required to lower Statepoints. It does not include the code to actually generate the STATEPOINT machine instruction and as a result, the entire patch is currently dead code. I will be submitting the SelectionDAG parts within the next 24-48 hours. Since those pieces are by far the most complicated, I wanted to minimize the size of that patch. That patch will include the tests which exercise the functionality in this patch. The entire series can be seen as one combined whole in http://reviews.llvm.org/D5683.
The STATEPOINT psuedo node is generated after all gc values are explicitly spilled to stack slots. The purpose of this node is to wrap an actual call instruction while recording the spill locations of the meta arguments used for garbage collection and other purposes. The STATEPOINT is modeled as modifing all of those locations to prevent backend optimizations from forwarding the value from before the STATEPOINT to after the STATEPOINT. (Doing so would break relocation semantics for collectors which wish to relocate roots.)
The implementation of STATEPOINT is closely modeled on PATCHPOINT. Eventually, much of the code in this patch will be removed. The long term plan is to merge the functionality provided by statepoints and patchpoints. Merging their implementations in the backend is likely to be a good starting point.
Reviewed by: atrick, ributzka
llvm-svn: 223085
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
--
This patch enables LLVM to emit Win64-native unwind info rather than
DWARF CFI. It handles all corner cases (I hope), including stack
realignment.
Because the unwind info is not flexible enough to describe stack frames
with a gap of unknown size in the middle, such as the one caused by
stack realignment, I modified register spilling code to place all spills
into the fixed frame slots, so that they can be accessed relative to the
frame pointer.
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4081
llvm-svn: 211691
This patch enables LLVM to emit Win64-native unwind info rather than
DWARF CFI. It handles all corner cases (I hope), including stack
realignment.
Because the unwind info is not flexible enough to describe stack frames
with a gap of unknown size in the middle, such as the one caused by
stack realignment, I modified register spilling code to place all spills
into the fixed frame slots, so that they can be accessed relative to the
frame pointer.
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4081
llvm-svn: 211399
The old system was fairly convoluted:
* A temporary label was created.
* A single PROLOG_LABEL was created with it.
* A few MCCFIInstructions were created with the same label.
The semantics were that the cfi instructions were mapped to the PROLOG_LABEL
via the temporary label. The output position was that of the PROLOG_LABEL.
The temporary label itself was used only for doing the mapping.
The new CFI_INSTRUCTION has a 1:1 mapping to MCCFIInstructions and points to
one by holding an index into the CFI instructions of this function.
I did consider removing MMI.getFrameInstructions completelly and having
CFI_INSTRUCTION own a MCCFIInstruction, but MCCFIInstructions have non
trivial constructors and destructors and are somewhat big, so the this setup
is probably better.
The net result is that we don't create temporary labels that are never used.
llvm-svn: 203204
We used to generate the compact unwind encoding from the machine
instructions. However, this had the problem that if the user used `-save-temps'
or compiled their hand-written `.s' file (with CFI directives), we wouldn't
generate the compact unwind encoding.
Move the algorithm that generates the compact unwind encoding into the
MCAsmBackend. This way we can generate the encoding whether the code is from a
`.ll' or `.s' file.
<rdar://problem/13623355>
llvm-svn: 190290
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
X86. Modify the pass added in the previous patch to call this new
code.
This new prologues generated will call a libgcc routine (__morestack)
to allocate more stack space from the heap when required
Patch by Sanjoy Das.
llvm-svn: 138812
unwind encoding for that function. This simply crawls through the prolog looking
for machine instrs marked as "frame setup". It can calculate from these what the
compact unwind should look like.
This is currently disabled because of needed linker support. But initial tests
look good.
llvm-svn: 135922
Reid Kleckner